117
Views
9
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Obstetrics

Perinatal asphyxia is associated with the umbilical cord nucleated red blood cell count in pre-eclamptic pregnancies

, , , &
Pages 383-386 | Published online: 12 May 2010

References

  • Buonocore G, Perrone S, Gioia D, Gatti MG, Massafra C, Agosta R, et al 1999. Nucleated red blood cell count at birth as an index of perinatal brain damage. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 181:1500–1505.
  • Hanlon-Lundberg KM, Kirby RS. 1999. Nucleated red blood cells as a marker of acidemia in term neonates. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 181:196–201.
  • Korst LM, Phelan JP, Ahn MO, Martin GI. 1996. Nucleated red blood cells: an update on the marker for fetal asphyxia. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 176:843–846.
  • Lain KY, Roberts JM. 2002. Contemporary concepts of the pathogenesis and management of pre-eclampsia. Journal of the American Medical Association 287:3183–3186.
  • Lim FT, Scherjon SA, van Beckhoven JM, Brand A, Kanhai HH, Hermans JM, et al 2000. Association of stress during delivery with increased numbers of nucleated cells and hematopoietic progenitor cells in umbilical cord blood. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 183:1144–1152.
  • Perri T, Ferber T, Digli A, Rabizadeh E, Weissmann-Brenner A, Divon MY. 2004. Nucleated red blood cells in uncomplicated prolonged pregnancy. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists 104:372–376.
  • Phelan JP, Ahn MO, Korst LM, Martin GI. 1995. Nucleated red blood cells: a marker for fetal asphyxia? American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 173:1380–1384.
  • Saraçoğlu F, Sahin I, Eser E, Göl K, Türkkani B. 2000. Nucleated red blood cells as a marker in acute and chronic fetal asphyxia. International Journal of Gynecology and Obstetrics 71:113–118.
  • Sibai BM, Dekker G, Kupferminic M. 2005. Pre-eclampsia. Lancet 365:785–799.
  • Üstün Y, Engin-Ustün Y, Kaya E, Meydanli MM, Kulak N. 2006. Elevated nucleated red blood cell count: a population-based study. Journal of Reproductive Medicine 51:36–40.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.