![The World Congress on Controversies in Obstetrics, Gynecology and Infertility (COGI). Click here to learn more.]({"type":"image" , "src" : "/sda/112382/JournalAd-COGI2024-Leaderboard.jpg"})
References
- BalochS, KhaskheliM, KhushkI, SheebaA. 2008. Frequency of second stage intervention and its outcome in relation with instrumental vaginal delivery versus caesarean section. Journal of Ayub Medical College Abbottabad20:87–90.
- MurphyD, LieblingR, VerityL, SwinglerR, PatelR. 2001. Early maternal and neonatal morbidity associated with operative delivery in second stage of labor: A Cohort Study. Lancet358:1203–1207.
- MurphyD, LieblingR, PatelR, VerityL, SwinglerR. 2003a. Cohort study of operative delivery in the second stage of labour and standard of obstetric care. British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology110:610–615.
- MurphyD, LieblingR. 2003b. Cohort study on maternal views on future mode of delivery after operative delivery in the second stage of labor. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology188:542–548.
- OlahK. 2005. Reversal of the decision for caesarean section in the second stage of labour on the basis of consultant vaginal assessment. Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology25:115–116.
- RCOG. 2005. The future role of the consultant – A working party report. London; Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists.