112
Views
3
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
GYNAECOLOGY

A prospective audit of the quality of documentation of gynaecological operations

, , , &
Pages 510-513 | Published online: 08 Aug 2011

References

  • Al-Hussainy H, Ali F, Jones S, McGregor-Rigby JC, Sukumar S. 2004. Improving the standard of operation notes in orthopaedic and trauma surgery. International Journal of the Care of the Injured 35: 1102–1106.
  • Barritt AW, Clark L, Cohen AM, Hosangadi-Jayedev N, Gibb PA. 2010. Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England 92:159–162.
  • Basad E. 1999. Importance of computer-based procedures. Planning and documentation in orthopaedic surgery. Orthopaedics 28:277–284.
  • Bateman ND, Carney AS, Gibbin KP. 1999. An audit of operation notes in an otolaryngology unit. Journal of the Royal College of Surgeons, Edinburgh 44:94–95.
  • Dale RF, Midwinter MJ. 1996. Use of database management systems by surgeons to produce operation notes. Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England 78:272–275.
  • Deimel D, Messer E, Thielemann HG, Picha G. 1999. Standardized computer-based documentation system for diagnoses performance in orthopaedics and traumatology. Development and Initial Application. Orthopaedics 28:285–291.
  • Lefter LP, Walker SR, Dewhurst F, Turner RW. 2008. An audit of operative notes; facts and ways to improve. Australia and New Zealand Journal of Surgery 78:800–802.
  • Mann R, Williams J. 2003. Standards in medical record keeping. Clinical Medicine 3:329–332.
  • Morgan D, Fisher N, Ahmad A, Alam F. 2009. Improving operation notes to meet British Orthopaedic Association guidelines. Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England 91:217–219.
  • Nicopoullos JD, Karar S, Gour A, Panter K. 2003. Significant improvement in quality of caesarean section documentation with dedicated operative proforma – completion of the audit cycle. Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology 23:381–386.
  • O'Bichere A, Sellu D. 1997. The quality of operation notes: can simple word processors help? Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England 79:204–209.
  • Patel AG, Mould T, Webb PJ. 1993. Inadequacies of hospital medical records. Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England 75: 10–12.
  • Rogers BA, Pleat. 2010. Is there adequate information on operation notes? The application of the Royal College of Surgeons of England guidelines. Journal of Perioperative Practice 9:339–342.
  • General Medical Council. 2001. The duties of a doctor registered with the General Medical Council. Good medical practice guideline booklet. 3rd. London: GMC
  • Royal College of Surgeons of England. 2008. Good surgical practice. London: Royal College of Surgeons of England.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.