![The World Congress on Controversies in Obstetrics, Gynecology and Infertility (COGI). Click here to learn more.]({"type":"image" , "src" : "/sda/112382/JournalAd-COGI2024-Leaderboard.jpg"})
References
- ACOG. 1998. Vaginal birth after pervious cesarean delivery. Practice Bulletin No. 2, October. Washington DC: American College of Obstetrician and Gynecologists.
- ACOG. 2000. Evaluation of cesarean delivery. Washington DC: American College of Obstetrician and Gynecologists.
- Alexander JM, Leveno KJ, Rouse DJ, London MB, Gilbert S, Spong CY, . 2007. Comparison of maternal and infant outcomes from primary cesarean delivery during the second compared with first stage of labor. Obstetrics and Gynecology 109:917–921.
- Allen VM, O'Connell CM, Baskett TF. 2005. Maternal and perinatal morbidity of caesarean delivery at full cervical dilatation compared with caesarean delivery in the first stage of labour. British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology 112:986–990.
- Cebekulu L, Buchmann EJ. 2006. Complications associated with cesarean section in the second stage of labor. International Journal of Gynecology and Obstetrics 95:110–114.
- Chopra S, Bagga R, Keepanasseril A, Jain V, Kalra J, Suri V. 2009. Disengagement of the deeply engaged fetal head during cesarean section in advanced labor: conventional method versus reverse breech extraction. Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica 88:1163–1166.
- Cunningham FG, Leveno KJ, Bloom SL, Hauth JC, Gilstrip III LC, Wenstrom KD. 2005. Cesarean delivery and peripartum hysterectomy. In: Cunningham FG, Leveno KJ, Bloom SL, Hauth JC, Gilstrip III LC, Wenstrom KD, eds. Williams’ obstetrics. New York: McGraw-Hill; Ch. 25, p. 587–606.
- Donald I. 1988. Caesarean section. In: Donald I, editor. Practical obstetric problems, 5th ed. London: Lloyd-Luke; p. 844–845.
- Fasubaa OB, Ezechi OC, Orji EO, Ogunniyi SO, Akindele ST, Loto OM . 2002. Delivery of the impacted head of the fetus at caesarean section after prolonged obstructed labour: a randomized comparative study of two methods. Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology 22:375–378.
- Fong YF, Arulkumaran S. 1997. Breech extraction – an alternative method of delivering a deeply engaged head at cesarean section. International Journal of Gynecology and Obstetrics 56:183–184.
- Gifford DS, Morton SC, Fiske M, Keesey J, Keeler E, Kahn KL. 2000. Lack of progress in labor as a reason for cesarean. Obstetrics and Gynecology 95:589–595.
- Landsman R, Graber EA. 1984. Abdominovaginal delivery: modification of the cesarean section operation to facilitate delivery of the impacted head. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 148:707–709.
- Levy R, Chernomoretz T, Appelman Z, Levin D, Or Y, Hagay ZJ. 2005. Head pushing versus reverse breech extraction in cases of impacted fetal head during caesarean section. European Journal of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Biology 121:24–26.
- Lipert TH. 1985. Abdominovaginal delivery in case of impacted head. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 151:703.
- RCOG. 2000. Instrumental vaginal delivery. Green-top guideline No. 26. London: Royal College of Obstetrician and Gynaecologists.
- Selo-Ojeme D, Sathiyathasan S, Fayyez M. 2008. Caesarean delivery at full cervical dilatation versus caesarean delivery in the first stage of labour: comparison of maternal and perinatal morbidity. Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics 278:245–249.
- Sethuram R, Jamjute P, Kevelighan E. 2010. Delivery of the deeply engaged head: a lacuna in training. Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology 30: 545–549.
- Smith JG, Mertz HL, Merrill DC. 2008. Identifying risk factors for uterine rupture. Clinics in Perinatology 35:85–99.
- Thomas J, Paranjothy S. 2001. Royal College of Obstetrician and Gynecologists Clinical Effectiveness Support Unit. National Sentinel Caesarean Section Audit Report. London: RCOG Press.