References
- Goldberg A. M. Product Safety Evaluation. Mary Ann Liebert, Inc., New York 1983
- Dagani R. Alternative Methods Could Cut Animal Use in Toxicity Tests. Chem. Eng. News (October 31, 1983); 12
- Spira H. (June, 1983), Coalition to Abolish the LD50 Coordinators Report, 3
- Goldman L. The Medical Sciences in Animals in Research, D. Sperlinger. John Wiley S. Sons, New York (1981); 112–116
- Goldberg A. M. Quarterly Newsletter of The Johns Hopkins Center for Alternatives to Animal Testing. Symposium Proceedings: Alternative Tests for Product Safety. 1983, (4)2
- Balazs T. Assessment of the Value of Systemic Toxicity Studies In Experimental Animals. New Concepts in Safety Evaluation Part 1, M. A. Mehlman, R. E. Shapiro, H. Blumenthal. John Wiley &. Sons, New York (1976); 142–146
- Zbinden G., Flury-Roversi M. Significance of the LD50 test for the toxicological evaluation of chemical substances. Arch. Toxicol (1981); 47: 77–99
- Brownlee K. A., Hodges J. L., Rosenblatt M. O. The up-and-down method with small samples. J. Amer. Statist. Ass. (1953); 48: 262–277
- Dixon W. J. The up and down method for small samples. J. Amer. Statist. Ass. (1965); 60: 967–978
- Eichhorn B. H., Zacks S. Dept. of Mathematics and Statistics, Case Western University, OhioUSA (1972), Sequential search of an optimal dosage: Technical Report No. 5
- Gad S. C. A neuromuscular screen for use in industrial toxicology. J. Toxicol. Env. Hlth (1982); 9: 691–704