Interpretation and Misinterpretation of Semen Parameters

References

• Aitken R J, Best F SM, Richardson D W, et al. An analysis of sperm function in cases of unexplained infertility: Conventional criteria, movement characteristics, and fertilizing capacity. Fertil Steril 1982; 38: 212–221
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amelar R D, Dubin L, Quigley M M, Shoenfeld C Y. Successful management of infertility due to polys-permia. Fertil Steril 1979; 31: 521–524
   Google Scholar
• Amelar R D, Hotchkiss R S. Congenital aplasia of the epididymal and vasa deferentia: Effects on semen. Fertil Steril 1963; 14: 44–48
   Google Scholar
• Amelar R D, Hotchkiss R S. Antisperm antibodies and fertility. Lancet 1981; 136–138
   Google Scholar
• Bronson R A, Cooper G W, Rosenfeld D L. Sperm-specific isoantibodies and autoantibodies inhibit the binding of human sperm to be human zona pellucida. Fertil Steril 1982; 38: 724–729
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bronson R A, Cooper G W, Rosenfeld D L. Sperm antibodies: Their role in infertility. Fertil Steril 1984; 42: 171–183
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burke R K, Kapinos L J. The effect of in vitro sperm capacitation on sperm velocity and motility as measured by an in-office, integrated microcomputerized system for semen analysis. Int J Fertil 1985; 30: 10–17
   Google Scholar
• CRYO Resources. CellSoft User Manual, ed 1. CRYO Resources, New York, NY 1986; 33–35, version 3
   Google Scholar
• Check J H, Chase J S, Nowroozi K, et al. Empirical therapy of the male with clomiphene in couples with unexplained infertility. Intl J Fertil 1989, in press
   Google Scholar
• Check J H, Nowroozi K, Wu C H, et al. The clinical significance of the hypo-osmotic swelling (HOS) test. Presented at the Meeting of the Pacific Coast Fertility Society, Palm Springs, CA, April, 13, 1988
   Google Scholar
• Check J H, Nowroozi K, Wu C H, et al. Correlation of the semen analysis and the hypo-osmotic swelling test with subsequent pregnancies: A preliminary report. Arch Androl 1988; 20: 251–255
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Check J H, Shanis B S, Wu C H, Bollendorf A. Evaluating glass, polystyrene and polypropylene containers for semen collection and sperm washing. Arch Androl 1988; 20: 256–260
   Google Scholar
• Check J H, Wu C H, Adelson H G, . The clinical usefulness of the hamster ova penetration test in unexplained infertility. Advances in Fertility and Sterility Series, S S Ratnam, E S Teoh, et al. Parthenon Publishing Group, Park Ridge, NJ, 211–217
   Google Scholar
• Corson S L, Batzer F R, Go K J, et al. Correlations between human sperm hamster egg penetration assay and in vitro fertilization results. J Reprod Med 1987; 32: 879–887
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eliasson R. Standards for the investigation of human seman. Andrology 1971; 3: 49–64
   Google Scholar
• Feneux D, Serres C, Jouannet P. Sliding spermatozoa: A dyskinesia responsible for human infertility. Fertil Steril 1985; 44: 508–511
   Google Scholar
• Giblin P T, Poland M L, Moghissi K S, et al. Effects of stress and characteristics adaptability on semen quality in healthy men. Fertil Steril 1988; 49: 127–132
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grunfeld L, Richardson K. Linear sperm motion does not predict human oocyte fertilization. Presented at the 43rd Annual Meeting of the American Fertility Society, Reno, NV, September, 1987
   Google Scholar
• Holt W V, Moore H DM, Hillier S G. Computer-assisted measurement of sperm swimming speed in human semen: Correlation of results with in vitro fertilization assays. Fertil Steril 1985; 44: 112–119
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jager S, Kroner J, Kuiken J, . Immunoglobulin class of sperm agglutinins in cervical mucus. Immunolog Influ of Human Fertil, B Boettcher, et al. Academic Press, Sydnox, New York 1977; 289–293, Sydney, Australia and New York
   Google Scholar
• Jeyendran R S, VanderVen H H, Perez-Palaez M, et al. Development of an assay to assess the functional integrity of the human sperm membrane and its relationship to other semen characteristics. J Reprod Fertil 1984; 70: 219–228
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Katz D F, Overstreet J W. Sperm motility assessment by videomicrography. Fertil Steril 1981; 35: 188–193
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Keel B A, Webster B W. Correlation of human sperm motility characteristics with an in vitro cervical mucus penetration test. Fertil Steril 1988; 49: 138–143
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Knuth U A, Nieschlag E. Comparison of computerized semen analysis with the conventional procedure in 322 patients. Fertil Steril, 49: 881–885
   Google Scholar
• Knuth U A, Yeung C H, Nieschlag E. Computerized semen analysis: Objective measurement of semen characteristics is biased by subjective parameter settings. Fertil Steril 1987; 48: 118–124
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kruger T F, Menkveld R, et al. Sperm morphologic features as a prognostic factor in in vitro fertilization. Fertil Steril 1986; 46: 1118–1123
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mahony M C, Alexander M S, Swanson R J. Evaluation of semen parameters by means of automated sperm motion analyzers. Fertil Steril 1988; 49: 876–880
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Makler A, Deutch M, Vilensky A, et al. Factors affecting sperm motility: Part VIU: Velocity and survival of human spermatozoa as related to temperatures above zero. Int J Androl 1981; 4(5)559–569
   Google Scholar
• Mathur S, Carlton M, Ziegler J, et al. A computerized sperm motion analysis. Fertil Steril 1986; 46: 484–488
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCoshen Wodzicki A. Quantitative Analysis of the Velocities and Trajectories of Human Sperm Cells in Vitro. University of Manitoba Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Sciences, Winnipeg 1986, Presented to the American Fertility Society, Toronto, Canada, September.
   Google Scholar
• Meaker S R. Human Sterility: Causation, Diagnosis and Treatment. A Practical Manual of Clinical Procedure. Williams and Wilkins, Baltimore, MD 1934; 110
   Google Scholar
• Mortimer D, Serres C, Mortimer S T, et al. Influence of image sampling frequency on the perceived movement characteristics of progressively motile human spermatozoa. Gamete Res 1988; 20: 313–327
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Parulkar B F, Jacobs L A, Benda A R, et al. Computerized vs traditional semen analysis. (Abstract). Presented at the 14th Meeting of the American Society of Andrology, New Orleans, LA, April, 13, 1989
   Google Scholar
• Phadke A, Padukone K. Presence and significance of autoantibodies against spermatozoa in the blood of men with obstructed vas deferens. J Reprod Fertil 1964; 7: 162–170
   Google Scholar
• Rogers B J. The sperm penetration assay: Its usefulness re-evaluated. Fertil Steril 1985; 43: 821–840
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rogers B J, Bentwood B J, VanCampen H, et al. Sperm morphology assessment as an indicator of human fertilizing capacity. J Androl 1983; 4: 119–125
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Rogers B J, Van Campen H, Ueno M, et al. Analysis of human spermatozoa fertilizing ability using zona-free ova. Fertil Steril 1979; 32: 664–670
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vander Ven H H, Jeyendran R S, Al-Hasani S, et al. Correlation between human sperm swelling in hypo-osmotic medium (hypo-osmotic swelling test) and in vitro fertilization. J Androl 1986; 7: 190–196
   Google Scholar
• Yanagimachi R, Yanagimachi H, Rogers B J. The use of zona-free animal ova as a test system for the assessment of the fertilizing capacity of human spermatozoa. Biol Reprod 1976; 15: 471–476
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Young P E, Herbert S A, Kennedy J F, Villanveva B. Measurements of more sensitive parameters of male fertility by computer-assisted semen analysis. Presented at the Meeting of the Pacific Coast OB/GYN Society. September, 1986
   Google Scholar
• Zavos P M. Seminal parameters of ejaculates collected from oligospermic and normospennic patients via masturbation and at intercourse with the use of a Silastic seminal fluid collection device. Fertil Steril 1985; 44: 517–520
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar