The Use of Iodixanol as a Density Gradient Material for Separating Human Sperm from Semen

References

• Alvarez J G, Lasso J L, Blasco L, Nunez R C, Heyner S, Caballero P P, Storey B T. Centrifuga-tion of human spermatozoa induces sub-lethal damage; separation of human spermatozoa from seminal plasma by dextran swim-up procedure without centrifugation extends their motile life. Hum Reprod 1993; 8: 1087–1092
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arcidiacono A, Walt H, Campana A, Balerna M. The use of Percoll gradients for the preparation of subpopulations of human spermatozoa. Int J Androl 1983; 6: 433–445
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Amy M, Quagliarello J. Semen quality before and after processing by swim-up method: relationship to outcome of intrauterine insemination. Fertil Steril 1987; 48: 643–648
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Berger T, Marrs R P, Moyer D L. Comparison of techniques for selection of motile spemmatozoa. Fertil Steril 1985; 43: 268–273
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bolstad B, Borch K W, Grynne B H, Lundby B, Nossen J OE, Kloster Y F, Kristoffersen D T, Andrew E. Clinical trials of newer iodinated agents. Safety and tolerability of iodixanol. A dimeric, nonionic contrast medium: an emphasis on European clinical phases I and II. Invest Radiol 1991; 26: S201–S204
   Google Scholar
• Bongso A, Jarina A K, Ho J, Ng S C, Ratnam S S. Comparative evaluation of three sperm washing methods to improve sperm concentration and motility in frozen-thawed oligozoospermic and normozoospermic samples. Arch Androl 1993; 31: 223–230
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chan S YW, Chan Y M, Tucker M J. Comparison of characteristics of human spermatozoa selected by the multiple tube swim-up and simple discontinuous Percoll gradient. Andrologia 1990; 23: 213–218
   Google Scholar
• Dravland J E, Mortimer D. A simple discontinuous Percoll gradient procedure for washing human spermatozoa. IRCS Med Sci 1985; 13: 16–17
   Google Scholar
• Eivindvik K, Sjogren C E. Physicochemical properties of iodixanol. Acta Radiol 1995; 36(Suppl 399)32–38
   Google Scholar
• Forster M S, Smith W D, Lee W I, Berger R E, Karp L E, Stenchever M A. Selection of human spermatozoa according to their relative motility and their interaction with zona-free hamster eggs. Fertil Steril 1983; 40: 655–660
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fugikawa K, Sakaguchi Y, Harada S, Holtz E, Smith J A, Svedson O. Reproductive toxicity of iodixanol, a new non-ionic isotonic contrast medium in rats and rabbits 1995; 20(Suppl 1)107–115
   Google Scholar
• Gellert-Mortimer S T, Clarke G N, Baker H WG, Hyne R V, Johnson W IH. Evaluation of Nycodenz and Percoll density gradients for the selection of motile human spermatozoa. Fertil Steril 1988; 49: 335–341
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harnish P P, Fountaine H, Ebrahimi R. Iodixanol: experience in 1,259 patients in the United States. Invest Radiol 1994; 29(Suppl 2)S236–S237
   Google Scholar
• Harrison R AP. A highly efficient method for washing mammalian spermatozoa. J Reprod Fertil 1976; 48: 347–353
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Harrison R AP, White I G. Some methods for washing spermatozoa from bull, boar and ram: a comparison using biochemical and other criteria. J Reprod Fertil 1972; 29: 271–284
   Google Scholar
• Hattori H, Yamaguchi F, Ohno H, Nomura M. Antigenicity study of iodixanol, a new non-ionic contrast medium. J Toxicol Sci 1995; 20(Suppl 1)117–123
   Google Scholar
• Hyne R V, Stojanoff A, Clarke G N, Lopata A, Johnston W IH. Pregnancy from in vitro fertilization of human eggs after separation of motile spermatozoa by density gradient centrifugation. Fertil Steril 1986; 45: 93–96
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Igarashi M, Nakayama S, Jones E, Shimada H. Mutagenicity studies of iodixanol, a new non-ionic isotonic contrast medium. J Toxicol Sci 1995; 20(Suppl 1)125–131
   Google Scholar
• Jones R G, Holt W V. The effects of washing on the ultrastructure and cytochemistry of ram spermatozoa. J Reprod Fertil 1974; 41: 159–167
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Jorgensen N P, Nossen J O, Borch K W, Kristiansen A B, Kristoffersen D T, Lundby B, Theodorsen L. Safety and tolerability of iodixanol in healthy volunteers with reference to two monomeric X-ray contrast media. Eur J Radiol 1992; 15: 252–257
   Google Scholar
• Karcioglu Z A, Aran A J, Holmes D L, Kapicioglu Z, Lopez J. Inflammation due to surgical glove powders in the rabbit eye. Arch Ophthalmol 1988; 106: 808–811
   Google Scholar
• Kruger T F, Acosta A A, Simmons K F, Swanson R J, Matta J F, Oehninger S. Predictive value of abnormal sperm morphology in in vitro fertilization. Fertil Steril 1988; 49: 112–117
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Makler A, Jakobi P. Factors affecting sperm motility, V: washing and resuspension of human spermatozoa in various artificial media. Fertil Steril 1981; 35: 422–446
   Google Scholar
• Menkveld R, Swanson R J, Kotze T J v W, Kruger T F. Comparison of a discontinuous Percoll gradient method versus a swim-up method: effects on sperm morphology and other semen parameters. Andrologia 1989; 2: 152–158
   Google Scholar
• Mortimer D. Semen analysis and sperm washing techniques. Controls of Sperm Motility: Biological and Clinical Aspects, C Gagnon. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL 1990; 263–284
   Google Scholar
• Nossen J O, Aakhus T, Berg K J, Jorgensen N P, Andrew E. Experience with iodixanol, a new non-ionic dimeric contrast medium new. Preliminary results from a human phase I study. Invest Radiol 1990; 25: S113–S114
   Google Scholar
• Oshiro S. Apparent densities of spermatozoa of various mammalian species. Gamete Res 1988; 20: 159–164
   Google Scholar
• Pertoff H, Laurent T C, Laas T. Density gradients prepared from colloidal silica particles coated by polyvinylpyrrolidone (Percoll). Anal Biochem 1978; 88: 271–277
   Google Scholar
• Pickering S J, Fleming T P, Braude P R, Bolton V N, Gresham G AG. Are human spermatozoa separated on Percoll density gradient safe for therapeutic use?. Fertil Steril 1989; 51: 1024–1029
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sbacia M, Sayme N, Grasso J, Vigue L, Huszar G. Sperm function and choice of preparation media: comparison of Percoll and Accudenz discontinuous density gradients. J Androl 1996; 17: 61–67
   Google Scholar
• Serafini P, Blank W, Tran C, Mansourian M, Tan T, Batzofin J. Enhanced penetration of zona-free hamster ova by sperm prepared by Nycodenz and Percoll gradient centrifugation. Fertil Steril 1990; 53: 551–555
   Google Scholar
• Shastry P R, Hegde U C, Rao S S. Use of Ficoll-sodium metrizoate density gradient to separate human X- and Y-bearing sperm. Nature 1977; 269: 58–60
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ziebe S, Anderson C Y. Isolation of motile spermatozoa: comparison of Percoll centrifugation, SpermPrep filtration and swim-up techniques. J Assist Reprod Gen 1993; 10: 485–487
   Google Scholar