Advanced search
Publication Cover
Neuro-Ophthalmology Volume 40, 2016 - Issue 3
Submit an article Journal homepage
231
Views
4
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Evaluation of Relative Afferent Pupillary Defect Using RAPDx Device in Patients with Optic Nerve Disease

Tsukasa SatouDepartment of Ophthalmology, Kitasato University School of Medicine, Kanagawa, Japan
,
Hitoshi IshikawaDepartment of Ophthalmology, Kitasato University School of Medicine, Kanagawa, Japan;Department of Orthoptics and Visual Science, Kitasato University School of Allied Health Sciences, Kanagawa, JapanCorrespondence[email protected]
,
Ken AsakawaDepartment of Orthoptics and Visual Science, Kitasato University School of Allied Health Sciences, Kanagawa, Japan
,
Toshiaki GosekiDepartment of Ophthalmology, Kitasato University School of Medicine, Kanagawa, Japan
,
Takahiro NiidaDepartment of Orthoptics and Visual Sciences, International University of Health and Welfare School of Allied Health Sciences, Ootawara, Japan
&
Kimiya ShimizuDepartment of Ophthalmology, Kitasato University School of Medicine, Kanagawa, Japan
Pages 120-124 | Received 20 Mar 2016, Accepted 20 Mar 2016, Published online: 14 Apr 2016

References

  • Levatin P. Pupillary escape in disease of the retina or optic nerve. Arch Ophthalmol 1959;62:768–779.
  • Thompson HS, Corbett JJ, Cox TA. How to measure the relative afferent pupillary defect. Surv Ophthalmol 1981;26:39–42.
  • Kawasaki A, Moore P, Kardon RH. Variability of the relative afferent pupillary defect. Am J Ophthalmol 1995;120:622–633.
  • Kawasaki A, Moore P, Kardon RH. Long-term fluctuation of relative afferent pupillary defect in subjects with normal visual function. Am J Ophthalmol 1996;122:875–882.
  • Chang DS, Arora KS, Boland MV, Supakontanasan W, Friedman DS. Development and validation of an associative model for the detection of glaucoma using pupillography. Am J Ophthalmol 2013;156:1285–1296.
  • Ozeki N, Yuki K, Shiba D, Tsubota K. Pupillographic evaluation of relative afferent pupillary defect in glaucoma patients. Br J Ophthalmol 2013;97:1583–1542.
  • Chang DS, Boland MV, Arora KS, Supakontanasan W, Chen BB, Friedman DS. Symmetry of the pupillary light reflex and its relationship to retinal nerve fiber layer thickness and visual field defect. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2013;54:5596–5601.
  • Tatham AJ, Meira-Freitas D, Weinreb RN, Marvasti AH, Zangwill LM, Medeiros FA. Estimation of retinal ganglion cell loss in glaucomatous eyes with a relative afferent pupillary defect. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2014;55:513–522.
  • Tatham AJ, Meira-Freitas D, Weinreb RN, Zangwill LM, Medeiros FA. Detecting glaucoma using automated pupillography. Ophthalmology 2014;121:1185–1193.
  • Waisbourd M, Lee B, Ali MH, Lu L, Martinez P, Faria B, Williams A, Moster MR, Katz LJ, Spaeth GL. Detection of asymmetric glaucomatous damage using automated pupillography, the swinging flashlight method and the magnified-assisted swinging flashlight method. Eye (Lond) 2015;29:1321–1328.
  • Takizawa G, Miki A, Maeda F, Goto K, Araki S, Ieki Y, Kiryu J, Yaoeda K. Association between a relative afferent pupillary defect using pupillography and inner retinal atrophy in optic nerve disease. Clin Ophthalmol 2015;9:1895–1903.
  • Law CL, Siu M, Modica P, Backus B. Stimulus characteristics affect assessment of pupil defects in amblyopia. Optom Vis Sci 2015;92:551–558.
  • Sato T, Goseki T, Asakawa K, Ishikawa H, Shimizu K. Effects of dark adaptation time on measurement values and its reproducibility using RAPDx® device in Healthy subjects [in Japanese]. Neuro-Ophthalmol Jpn 2015;32:263–268.
  • Satou T, Goseki T, Asakawa K, Ishikawa H, Shimizu K. Effects of age and sex on values obtained by RAPDx® pupillometer, and determined the standard values for detecting relative afferent pupillary defect. Transl Vis Sci Technol; In press.
  • Cox TA, Thompson HS, Corbett JJ. Relative afferent pupillary defects in optic neuritis. Am J Ophthalmol 1981;92:685–690.
  • Thompson HS, Montague P, Cox TA, Corbett JJ. The relationship between visual acuity, pupillary defect, and visual field loss. Am J Ophthalmol 1982;93:681–688.
  • Wilhelm H, Meilinger S, Apfelstedt E. Relation between relative afferent pupillary defect and suprathreshold automated perimetry. Klin Monbl Augenheilkd 1997;210:365–369.
  • Ogasawara K, Takahashi Y, Odashima S. Re-evaluation of swinging flashlight test in measuring relative afferent pupillary defect [in Japanese]. Jpn J Clin Ophthalmol 1985;39:745–750.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Order Reprints Request Corporate Permissions

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

Request Academic Permissions

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.

Related research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.