References
- Levatin P. Pupillary escape in disease of the retina or optic nerve. Arch Ophthalmol 1959;62:768–779.
- Thompson HS, Corbett JJ, Cox TA. How to measure the relative afferent pupillary defect. Surv Ophthalmol 1981;26:39–42.
- Kawasaki A, Moore P, Kardon RH. Variability of the relative afferent pupillary defect. Am J Ophthalmol 1995;120:622–633.
- Kawasaki A, Moore P, Kardon RH. Long-term fluctuation of relative afferent pupillary defect in subjects with normal visual function. Am J Ophthalmol 1996;122:875–882.
- Chang DS, Arora KS, Boland MV, Supakontanasan W, Friedman DS. Development and validation of an associative model for the detection of glaucoma using pupillography. Am J Ophthalmol 2013;156:1285–1296.
- Ozeki N, Yuki K, Shiba D, Tsubota K. Pupillographic evaluation of relative afferent pupillary defect in glaucoma patients. Br J Ophthalmol 2013;97:1583–1542.
- Chang DS, Boland MV, Arora KS, Supakontanasan W, Chen BB, Friedman DS. Symmetry of the pupillary light reflex and its relationship to retinal nerve fiber layer thickness and visual field defect. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2013;54:5596–5601.
- Tatham AJ, Meira-Freitas D, Weinreb RN, Marvasti AH, Zangwill LM, Medeiros FA. Estimation of retinal ganglion cell loss in glaucomatous eyes with a relative afferent pupillary defect. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2014;55:513–522.
- Tatham AJ, Meira-Freitas D, Weinreb RN, Zangwill LM, Medeiros FA. Detecting glaucoma using automated pupillography. Ophthalmology 2014;121:1185–1193.
- Waisbourd M, Lee B, Ali MH, Lu L, Martinez P, Faria B, Williams A, Moster MR, Katz LJ, Spaeth GL. Detection of asymmetric glaucomatous damage using automated pupillography, the swinging flashlight method and the magnified-assisted swinging flashlight method. Eye (Lond) 2015;29:1321–1328.
- Takizawa G, Miki A, Maeda F, Goto K, Araki S, Ieki Y, Kiryu J, Yaoeda K. Association between a relative afferent pupillary defect using pupillography and inner retinal atrophy in optic nerve disease. Clin Ophthalmol 2015;9:1895–1903.
- Law CL, Siu M, Modica P, Backus B. Stimulus characteristics affect assessment of pupil defects in amblyopia. Optom Vis Sci 2015;92:551–558.
- Sato T, Goseki T, Asakawa K, Ishikawa H, Shimizu K. Effects of dark adaptation time on measurement values and its reproducibility using RAPDx® device in Healthy subjects [in Japanese]. Neuro-Ophthalmol Jpn 2015;32:263–268.
- Satou T, Goseki T, Asakawa K, Ishikawa H, Shimizu K. Effects of age and sex on values obtained by RAPDx® pupillometer, and determined the standard values for detecting relative afferent pupillary defect. Transl Vis Sci Technol; In press.
- Cox TA, Thompson HS, Corbett JJ. Relative afferent pupillary defects in optic neuritis. Am J Ophthalmol 1981;92:685–690.
- Thompson HS, Montague P, Cox TA, Corbett JJ. The relationship between visual acuity, pupillary defect, and visual field loss. Am J Ophthalmol 1982;93:681–688.
- Wilhelm H, Meilinger S, Apfelstedt E. Relation between relative afferent pupillary defect and suprathreshold automated perimetry. Klin Monbl Augenheilkd 1997;210:365–369.
- Ogasawara K, Takahashi Y, Odashima S. Re-evaluation of swinging flashlight test in measuring relative afferent pupillary defect [in Japanese]. Jpn J Clin Ophthalmol 1985;39:745–750.