Donor insemination, the impact on family and child development

References

• Gerstel G. A psychoanalytic view of artificial donor insemination. Am J Psychother 1963; 17: 64–77
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berger D. Couples reactions to male infertility and donor insemination. Am J Psychiatr 1980; 137: 1047–9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manuel C, Czyba J C. Aspects Psychologiques de I'Insemination Artificiel. SIMEP, Lyon 1983
   Google Scholar
• Delaisi de ParseVal G. L'enfant a Tout Prix. Seoul, Paris 1983
   Google Scholar
• Triseliotis J. In Search of Origins: the Experience of Adopted People. Routledge & Kegan Paul, London 1973
   Google Scholar
• Triseliotis J. Donor insemination and the child. Politics & Life Sci 1993; 12: 195–6
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Brodzinsky D. Adjusment to adoption, a psychosocial perspective. Clin Psychol Rev 1987; 7: 25–47
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Humphrey M, Humphrey H. Adoption, the need for identity. 'Families with a difference'. Routledge, London 1988; 65–83
   Google Scholar
• Warnock M. The Warnock Report on Human Fertilisation and Embryology, a Question of life. Blackwell, Oxford 1986
   Google Scholar
• Rowland R. The social and psychological consequences of secrecy in artificial insemination by donor programmes. Soc Sci Med 1985; 21: 391–6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McWhinnie A. AID and infertility. J Adopt Fost 1986; 10: 16–18
   Google Scholar
• Clamar A J. Psychological implications of the anonymous pregnancy. Families in Transition: a New Frontier, J Offerman‐Zuckenberg. Plenum Press, New York 1989; 111–20
   Google Scholar
• Daniels K. Artificial insemination using anonymous semen and the issue of secrecy: the views of donors and recipient couples. Soc Sci Med 1988; 27: 377–83
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baran A, Pannor B. Lethal Secrets. Warner Books, New York 1989
   Google Scholar
• Daniels K, Taylor K. Secrecy and openness in donor insemination. Politics & Life Sci 1993; 12: 155–70
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Grow A. Confidentiality and American semen donors. Int J Fertil 1993; 38: 147–51
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Haimes E. Secrecy: what can artificial insemination learn from adoption?. Int J Law and Family 1988; 2: 46–61
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bruce N. On the importance of genetic knowledge. Children and Society 1990; 4: 183–96
   Google Scholar
• Snowden R. Sharing information about DI in the UK. Politics & Life Sci 1993; 12: 194–5
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Humphrey M, Humphrey H. A fresh look at genealogical bewilderment. Br J Med Psychol 1986; 59: 133–40
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nachtigall R D. Secrecy: an unresolved issue in the practice of donor insemination. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1993; 168: 1846–9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cooke I D. Secrecy, openness and DI in the UK. Politics & Life Sci 1993; 12: 176–7
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Back K, Snowden R. The anonymity of the gamete donor. J Psychosom Obstet Gynaecol 1988; 9: 191–8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mahlstedt P, Greenfield D. Assisted reproductive technology with donor gametes: the need for patient preparation. Fertil Steril 1989; 52: 908–17
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haimes E. Secrecy and openness in DI: a sociological comment on Daniels and Taylor. Politics & Life Sci 1993; 12: 178–9
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Daniels K, Taylor K. Formulating selection policies for assisted reproduction. Soc Sci Med 1993; 37: 1473–80
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Meyer A, Hamerlynck J, Schagen S. Psychosociale aspekten van donor inseminatie. Ned T Geneesk 1980; 124: 592–9
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Clayton C, Kovacs G. AID offspring: initial follow up study of 50 couples. Med J Aust 1982; 1: 338–9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Milson I, Bergman E. A study of parental attitudes after donor insemination. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 1982; 61: 125–8
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Leeton J, Blackwell J. A preliminary psychosocial follow‐up of parents and their children conceived by AID. Clin Reprod Fertil 1982; 1: 307–10
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kremer J, Frijling B, Nass J. Psychosocial aspects of parenthood by AI. Lancet 1984; l‐8377: 628
   Google Scholar
• Manuel C, Facy F, Choquet M, Grandjean H, Czyba J C. Les risques psychologiques de la conception par IAD pour l'enfant. Neuropsychiatrie de I'enfance 1990; 38: 642–58
   Google Scholar
• Amuzu B, Laxova R, Shapiro S. Pregnancy outcome, health of children and family adjustment of children after DI. Obstet Gynecol 1990; 75: 899–905
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kloch S, Maier D. Psychological factors related to donor insemination. Fed Steril 1991; 56: 489–95
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Cook R, Golombok S, Bish A, Murray C. Disclosure of donor insemination: parental attitudes. Am J Orthopsychiatr 1995; 65: 549–59
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brewaeys A, Ponjaert I, Van Steirteghem A, Devroey R. Children from anonymous donors, an inquiry into homosexual and heterosexual parents attitudes. J Psychosom Obstet Gynaecol 1993; 14(Special issue)23–35
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Shilling G. Family secrets exemplified by heterologous insemination. Psychother Psychosom Med Psychol 1995; 45: 16–23
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Manuel C, Chevret M, Czyba J. Handling of secrecy by AID couples. Human Artificial Insemination and Semen Preservation, G David, W S Price. Plenum Press, New York 1980; 399–405
   Google Scholar
• Berger D, Eiser A, Shuber J, Doody K. Psychological patterns in donor insemination couples. Can J Psychiatr 1986; 31: 818–23
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Humphrey M, Humphrey H. Marital relationships in couples seeking donor insemination. J Biosoc Sci 1987; 19: 209–19
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Purdie A, Peek J F, Irwin R, Ellis J, Graham F, Fisher P. Identifiable semen donors: attitudes of donor and recipient couples. NZ Med J 1992; 105: 27–8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schover L R, Collins R L, Richards S. Psychological aspects of donor insemination: evaluation and follow up of recipient couples. Fertil Steril 1992; 57: 583–90
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kloch S, Jacob M, Maier D. A prospective study of donor insemination recipients: secrecy, privacy and disclosure. Fertil Steril 1994; 62: 477–84
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Schover L, Greenhalgh L, Richards S, Collins R. Psychological screening and the success of donor insemination. Hum Reprod 1994; 9: 176–8
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Cohen I, Duyvis D, van Lunsen R, Hogerzeil H (1995) Contributing factors to an open attitude towards therapeutic donor insemination offspring. Proceedings of the 11th ISPOG Congress, Basel, 1995, J Bitzer, M Stauber. Monduzzi Editore, Bologna, 315–21
   Google Scholar
• Rosenkvist H. Donor insemination, a prospective socio‐psychiatric investigation of 48 couples. Dan Med Bull 1981; 28: 133–48
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Brewaeys A, Ponjaert I, van Hall E, Helmerhorst F, Devroey P. Lesbian mothers who conceived after D. I., a follow up study. Hum Reprod 1995; 10: 2731–5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levie L H. An inquiry into the psychological effects of parents of artificial insemination with donor semen. Eugenics Rev 1967; 59: 97–105
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Swaab L I. Resultaten en ervaringen et donor inseminatie. Ned T Geneesk 1974; 118: 493–8
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Owens D, Edelman R, Humphrey M. Male infertility and donor insemination: couples decisions, reactions, and counseling needs. Hum Reprod 1993; 8: 880–5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Connolly K, Edelman R, Cooke I, Robson J. The impact of infertility on psychological functioning. J Psychosom Res 1992; 36: 459–68
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berg B, Wilson J. Psychiatric morbidity in the infertile population: a reconceptualisation. Fertil Steril 1990; 53: 654–61
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wright J, Duchesne C, Sabourin S, Bissonette F, Benoit J, Girard Y. Psychological distress and infertility, men and women respond differently. Fertil Steril 1991; 55: 100–8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Downey J, McKinney M. The psychiatric status of women presenting for infertility evaluation. Am J Orthopsychiatr 1992; 62: 196–205
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blazer A, Maloigne‐Katz B, Gigon U. Effect of artificial insemination with donor semen on the psyche of the husband. Psychother Psychosom 1988; 49: 17–21
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Reading A, Sledmere C, Cox D. A survey of patient attitudes towards artificial insemination by donor. J Psychosom Res 1982; 26: 429–33
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Golombok S, Cook R, Bish A, Murray C. Families created by the new reproductive technologies: quality of parenting, social, and emotional development of the children. Child Dev 1995; 66: 285–98
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Humphrey M, Humphrey H, Ainsworth‐Smith I. Screening couples for parenthood by donor insemination. Soc Sci Med 1991; 32: 273–8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nielsen A, Pedersen B, Lauritsen J. Psychosocial aspects of donor insemination. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 1995; 74: 45–50
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benvold E, Sjoberg D, Skjaeraasen J, Kravdal O, Mol N. Marital break up among couples raising families by artificial insemination. Fertil Steril 1989; 51: 980–3
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Iizuka R, Yoshiaki S, Nobuhiro N, Michie O. The physical and mental development of children born following artificial inseminations. Int J Fertil. 1968; 13: 124–32
   Google Scholar
• Kovacs G, Mushin D, Kane A, Baker H. A controlled study of the psychosocial development of children conceived following insemination with donor semen. Hum Reprod 1993; 8: 788–90
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar