Factors influencing the fulfillment of women’s preferences for birthing positions during second stage of labor

References

• O’Cathain A, Thomas K, Walters SJ, Nicholl J, Kirkham M. Women’s perceptions of informed choice in maternity care. Midwifery 2002;18:136–144.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gamble J, Creedy DK, Teakle B. Women’s expectations of maternity services: a community-based survey. Women Birth 2007;20:115–120.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Seefat-van Teeffelen A, Nieuwenhuijze M, Korstjens I. Women want proactive psychosocial support from midwives during transition to motherhood: a qualitative study. Midwifery 2011;27:e122–e127.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hendrix M, Van Horck M, Moreta D, Nieman F, Nieuwenhuijze M, Severens J, Nijhuis J. Why women do not accept randomisation for place of birth: feasibility of a RCT in The Netherlands. BJOG 2009;116:537–42; discussion 542.
   Google Scholar
• Hodnett ED. Pain and women’s satisfaction with the experience of childbirth: a systematic review. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2002;186:S160–S172.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Waldenström U, Hildingsson I, Rubertsson C, Rådestad I. A negative birth experience: prevalence and risk factors in a national sample. Birth 2004;31:17–27.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Green JM, Baston HA. Feeling in control during labor: concepts, correlates, and consequences. Birth 2003;30:235–247.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ICM. The philosophy and model of midwifery care 2005. Available at http://www.internationalmidwives.org/Portals/5/2010/Philosophy%20and%20model%20of%20midwifery%20care%20final%20oft2005.pdf Accessed June 25, 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Gupta JK, Hofmeyr GJ, Smyth RMD. Position in the second of labour for women without epidural anaesthesia (Review). Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2004, Issue 1. Art. No.: CD002006. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD002006.pub2
   Google Scholar
• de Jonge A, Teunissen TA, Lagro-Janssen AL. Supine position compared to other positions during the second stage of labor: a meta-analytic review. J Psychosom Obstet Gynaecol 2004;25:35–45.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Jonge A, van Diem MT, Scheepers PL, van der Pal-de Bruin KM, Lagro-Janssen AL. Increased blood loss in upright birthing positions originates from perineal damage. BJOG 2007;114:349–355.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Jonge A, Lagro-Janssen AL. Birthing positions. A qualitative study into the views of women about various birthing positions. J Psychosom Obstet Gynaecol 2004;25:47–55.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Green JM, Coupland VA, Kitzinger JV. Expectations, experiences, and psychological outcomes of childbirth: a prospective study of 825 women. Birth 1990;17:15–24.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Diem MTh. De invloed van kenmerken van de vrouw en de vroedvrouw op de baringshouding. [The influence of women’s and midwives’ characteristics on the birthing position]. Tijdschrift voor Verloskundigen 1997;22:18–27.
   Google Scholar
• Foureur M, Davis D, Fenwick J, Leap N, Iedema R, Forbes I, Homer CS. The relationship between birth unit design and safe, satisfying birth: developing a hypothetical model. Midwifery 2010;26:520–525.
   Google Scholar
• Hanson L. Second-stage positioning in nurse-midwifery practices. Part 2: Factors affecting use. J Nurse Midwifery 1998;43:326–330.
   Google Scholar
• Roberts JE. The “push” for evidence: management of the second stage. J Midwifery Womens Health 2002;47:2–15.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walsh D. Part five: why we should reject the “bed birth” myth. Br J Midwifery 2000;8:554–558.
   Google Scholar
• Dunn PM. Francois Mauriceau (1637-1709) and maternal posture for parturition. Arch Dis Child 1991;66:78–79.
   Google Scholar
• Rossi MA, Lindell SG. Maternal positions and pushing techniques in a nonprescriptive environment. J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs 1986;15:203–208.
   Google Scholar
• Russell JG. The rationale of primitive delivery positions. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1982;89:712–715.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hunt LM, Glantz NM, Halperin DC. Childbirth care-seeking behavior in Chiapas. Health Care Women Int 2002;23:98–118.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lugina H, Mlay R, Smith H. Mobility and maternal position during childbirth in Tanzania: an exploratory study at four government hospitals. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2004;4:3.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Field A. Discovering statistics using SPSS. London: SAGE Publications Ltd; 2009.
   Google Scholar
• The Netherlands Perinatal Registry (PRN-foundation). Bilthoven, 2007.
   Google Scholar
• van Teijlingen ER, Hundley V, Rennie AM, Graham W, Fitzmaurice A. Maternity satisfaction studies and their limitations: “What is, must still be best”. Birth 2003;30:75–82.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thachuk A. Midwifery, informed choice, and reproductive autonomy: a relational approach. Fem Psychol 2007;17:39–56.
   Google Scholar
• Cooke P. Helping women to make their own decisions. In: Raynor MD, Marshall JE, Sullivan A editors. Decision making in midwifery practice. Edinburgh: Elsevier; 2005. pp 127–141.
   Google Scholar
• Edwards NP. Why can’t women just say no? And does it really matter? In: Kirkham M editor. Informed choice in maternity care. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan; 2004. pp 1–29.
   Google Scholar
• Kitzinger S. Birth plans. In: The politics of birth. Edinburgh: Elsevier Health; 2005. pp 89–97.
   Google Scholar
• de Jonge A, Teunissen DA, van Diem MT, Scheepers PL, Lagro-Janssen AL. Women’s positions during the second stage of labour: views of primary care midwives. J Adv Nurs 2008;63:347–356.
   Google Scholar
• Green JM, Kitzinger JV, Coupland VA. Stereotypes of childbearing women: a look at some evidence. Midwifery 1990;6:125–132.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Stapleton H. Is there a difference between a free gift and a planned purchase? The use of evidence-based leaflets in maternity care. In: Kirkham M editor. Informed choice in maternity care. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan; 2004. pp 87–115.
   Google Scholar
• Borquez HA, Wiegers TA. A comparison of labour and birth experiences of women delivering in a birthing centre and at home in the Netherlands. Midwifery 2006;22:339–347.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson TR, Callister LC, Freeborn DS, Beckstrand RL, Huender K. Dutch women’s perceptions of childbirth in the Netherlands. MCN Am J Matern Child Nurs 2007;32:170–177.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dahlen HG, Barclay LM, Homer CS. The novice birthing: theorising first-time mothers’ experiences of birth at home and in hospital in Australia. Midwifery 2010;26:53–63.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wax JR, Lucas FL, Lamont M, Pinette MG, Cartin A, Blackstone J. Maternal and newborn outcomes in planned home birth vs planned hospital births: a metaanalysis. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2010;203:243.e1–243.e8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evers AC, Brouwers HA, Hukkelhoven CW, Nikkels PG, Boon J, van Egmond-Linden A, Hillegersberg J, et al. Perinatal mortality and severe morbidity in low and high risk term pregnancies in the Netherlands: prospective cohort study. BMJ 2010;341:c5639.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Janssen PA, Henderson AD, Vedam S. The experience of planned home birth: views of the first 500 women. Birth 2009;36:297–304.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hutton EK, Reitsma AH, Kaufman K. Outcomes associated with planned home and planned hospital births in low-risk women attended by midwives in Ontario, Canada, 2003-2006: a retrospective cohort study. Birth 2009;36:180–189.
   Google Scholar
• Maassen MS, Hendrix MJ, Van Vugt HC, Veersema S, Smits F, Nijhuis JG. Operative deliveries in low-risk pregnancies in The Netherlands: primary versus secondary care. Birth 2008;35:277–282.
   Google Scholar
• de Jonge A, van der Goes BY, Ravelli AC, Amelink-Verburg MP, Mol BW, Nijhuis JG, Bennebroek Gravenhorst J, Buitendijk SE. Perinatal mortality and morbidity in a nationwide cohort of 529,688 low-risk planned home and hospital births. BJOG 2009;116:1177–1184.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mol BWJ, de Jonge A, Nijhuis JG, Buitendijk SE. Thuisbevalling niet verantwoordelijk. [Home birth not responsible]. Medisch Contact 2010;65:2390–2393.
   Google Scholar
• Michal CA, Janssen PA, Vedam S, Hutton EK, de Jonge A. Planned home vs hospital birth: a meta-analysis gone wrong. Medscape Ob/Gyn & Women’s Health. Available at http://www.medscape.com/viewarticle/739987. Accessed April 01, 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Rijnders M, Baston H, Schönbeck Y, van der Pal K, Prins M, Green J, Buitendijk S. Perinatal factors related to negative or positive recall of birth experience in women 3 years postpartum in the Netherlands. Birth 2008;35:107–116.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christiaens W, Bracke P. Place of birth and satisfaction with childbirth in Belgium and the Netherlands. Midwifery 2009;25:e11–e19.
   Google Scholar
• Carlson JM, Diehl JA, Sachtleben-Murray M, McRae M, Fenwick L, Friedman EA. Maternal position during parturition in normal labor. Obstet Gynecol 1986;68:443–447.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van der Hulst LA, van Teijlingen ER, Bonsel GJ, Eskes M, Bleker OP. Does a pregnant woman’s intended place of birth influence her attitudes toward and occurrence of obstetric interventions? Birth 2004;31:28–33.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kelly FW, Terry R, Naglieri R. A review of alternative birthing positions. J Am Osteopath Assoc 1999;99:470–474.
   Google Scholar
• Festinger L. A theory of cognitive dissonance. Stanford: Stanford University Press; 1957.
   Google Scholar