The Turkish version of perceived support and control in birth scale

References

• Reynolds L. Post-traumatic stress disorder after childbirth: the phenomenon of traumatic birth. CMAJ 1997;156:831–5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elmir R, Virginia S, Lesley W, Jackson D. Women’s perceptions and experiences of a traumatic birth: a meta-ethnography. J Adv Nurs 2010;66:2142–53
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sawyer A, Ayers S, Abbott J, et al. Measures of satisfaction with care during birth and birth: a comparative review. BMC Preg Childbirth 2013;13:108
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haines HM, Hildingsson I, Pallant JF, Rubertsson C. The role of women's attitudinal profiles in satisfaction with the quality of their antenatal and intrapartum care. J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs 2013;42:428–41
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mongan MF. HypnoBirthing the Mongan method. 3rd ed. Deerfield Beach (FL): Health Communications Inc.; 2005
   Google Scholar
• Hodnett ED, Gates S, Hofmeyr GJ, et al. Continuous support for women during childbirth. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2011;16:CD003766
   Google Scholar
• MIDIRS. Support in birth informed choice for professionals leaflet. Bristol: MIDIRS; 2008
   Google Scholar
• Lawrence A, Lewis L, Hofmeyr GJ, et al. Maternal positions and mobility during first stage birth. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2009;15:CD003934
   Google Scholar
• Smith CA, Collins CT, Cyna AM, Crowther CA. Complementary and alternative therapies for pain management in birth (Review). Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2010;9:1–51
   Google Scholar
• Royal College of Midwifery (RCOM). Evidence based guidelines for midwifery-led care in birth. London: RCOM Press; 2012
   Google Scholar
• Ford E, Ayers S. Stressful events and support during birth: the effect on anxiety, mood and perceived control. J Anxiety Disord 2009;23:260–8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stevens N, Willston KA, Hailton NA. Perceived control and maternal satisfaction with childbirth: a measure development study. J Psychosom Obstet Gynaecol 2011;33:15–24
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodall EK, McVittie C, Magill M. Birth choice following primary caesarean section: mothers’ perceptions of the influence of health professionals on decision making. J Reprod Infant Psychol 2009;27:4–14
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ford E, Ayers S, Wright DB. Measurement of maternal perceptions of support and control in birth (SCIB). J Women’s Health 2009;18:245–52
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stevens NR, Wallston KA, Hamilton NA. Perceived control and maternal satisfaction with childbirth: a measure development study. J Psychosom Obstet Gynaecol 2011;33:15–24
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ayers S. Thoughts and emotions during traumatic birth: a qualitative study. Birth 2007;34:253–63
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tinti C, Schmidt S, Businaro N. Pain and emotions reported after childbirth and recalled 6 months later: the role of controllability. J Psychosom Obstet Gynaecol 2011;32:98–103
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ertem G, Sevil Ü. Doğum ağrısı ve hemşirelik yaklaşımı [Labor pain and nursing approaches]. Atatürk Üniversitesi Hemşirelik Yüksekokulu Dergisi 2004;8:117–23
   Google Scholar
• Callister CL, Khalaf I, Semenic S, Kartchner R, Julkunen KV. The pain of childbirth: perceptions of culturally diverse women. Pain Manag Nurs 2003;4:145–154
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• McLachlan H, Waldenström U. Childbirth experiences in Australia of women born in Turkey, Vietnam, and Australia. Birth 2005;32:272–82
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kline P. A handbook of test construction: introduction to psychometric design. New York: Methuen; 1986
   Google Scholar
• Hambleton RK. Guidelines for adapting educational and psychological tests: a progress report. Eur J Psychol Assess 1994;10:229–44
   Google Scholar
• Statistical Package for the Social Sciences Inc. SPSS statistics 16. Chicago (IL): SPSS Inc; 2008
   Google Scholar
• Ford JK, MacCallum RC, Tait M. The application of exploratory factor analysis in applied psychology: a critical review and analysis. Pers Psychol 1986;39:291–314
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thompson B, Daniel LG. Factor analytic evidence for the construct validity of scores: a historical overview and some guidelines. Educ Psychol Meas 1996;56:197–208
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaiser HF. The application of electronic computers to factor analysis. Educ Psychol Meas 1960;20:141–51
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cattell RB. The scientific use of factor analysis. New York: Plenum Press; 1978
   Google Scholar
• Hair JF, Black WC, Babin BJ, et al. Multivariate data analysis. Upper Saddle River (NJ): Pearson Education; 2006
   Google Scholar
• Zwick WR, Velicer WF. Comparison of five rules for determining the number of components to retain. Psychol Bull 1986;99:432–42
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jöreskog K, Sörbom D. Structural equation modeling with the SIMPLIS command language. Hillsdale (NJ): Lawrence Erlbaum Associates; 1993
   Google Scholar
• Thompson B. Exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis: understanding concepts and applications. Washington (DC): American Psychological Association; 2004
   Google Scholar
• Pallant J. SPSS survival manual. Buckingham (UK): Open University Press; 2005
   Google Scholar
• Türkiye Nüfus ve Sağlık Araştırması (TNSA). [2008 Turkey demographic and health survey TDHS-2008]. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Nüfus Etütleri Enstitüsü. 2008. Available from http://www.hips.hacettepe.edu.tr/eng/tdhs08/TDHS-2008_Main_Report.pdf [last accessed 12 Dec 2014]
   Google Scholar
• Türkiye Nüfus ve Sağlık Araştırması (TNSA). [2013 Turkey demographic and health survey TDHS-2013]. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Nüfus Etütleri Enstitüsü. 2013. Available from http://www.hips.hacettepe.edu.tr/TDHS_2013_main.report.pdf [last accessed 12 Dec 2014]
   Google Scholar
• Cohen J. Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. 2nd ed. Hillsdale (NJ): Erlbaum; 1988
   Google Scholar
• Şahin NH. Seksio- sezaryen: yaygınlığı ve sonuçları [Rates and outcome of cesarean section]. Maltepe Üniversitesi Hemşirelik Bilim ve Sanatı Dergisi 2009; 2:93–8
   Google Scholar
• Gözükara F, Eroğlu K. İlk doğumunu yapmış kadınların doğum şekline yönelik tercihlerini etkileyen faktörler [Factors that affect the choices of primipars on the mode of delivery]. Sağlık Bilimleri Fakültesi Hemşirelik Dergisi 2008;15:32–46
   Google Scholar
• Sağlık Bakanlığı ve Bağlı Kuruluşlarının Teşkilat ve Görevleri Hakkında Kanun Hükmünde Kararname ile Bazı Kanun ve Kanun Hükmünde Kararnamelerde Değişiklik Yapılmasına Dair Kanun [The Decree Law about the Organisation and Duties of Ministry of Health and Affiliates and Law on Certain Laws and the Decree Law]. Resmi Gazete. Tarih: 12.07.2012, Sayı: 28351
   Google Scholar
• Serçekuş P, Okumuş H. Fears associated with childbirth among nulliparous women in Turkey. Midwifery 2009;25:155–62
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saisto T, Kaaja R, Yliorkala O. Reduced pain tolerance during and after pregnancy in women suffering from fear of labour. Pain 2001;93:123–7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christiaens W, Bracke P. Assessment of social psychological determinants of satisfaction with childbirth in a cross-national perspective. BMJ Pregnancy Childbirth 2007;38:26
   Google Scholar
• Jones L, Othman M, Dowswell T, et al. Pain management for women in labour: an overview of systematic reviews. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2012;3:CD009234
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar