Client perspectives of midwifery care in the transition from subfertility to parenthood: a qualitative study in the Netherlands

References

• Mills M, Rindfuss RR, McDonald P, te Velde E; ESHRE Reproduction and Society Task Force. Why do people postpone parenthood? Reasons and social policy incentives. Hum Reprod Update 2011;17:848–60
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Centraal Bureau voor de Statistiek [Statistics Netherlands]. Bevolkingstrends, 1e kwartaal 2010. Oudere moeders, minder kinderen [Population Trends, 1st quarter 2010. Older mothers, fewer children]. Available at: http://www.cbs.nl/NR/rdonlyres/F634A6DF-3FC5-42CF-B816-4BA118618664/0/2010k1b15p9art.pdf [last accessed 28 May 2014]
   Google Scholar
• Kremer J, Wiersma TJ, Breejen den E, et al. Landelijke netwerkrichtlijn Subfertiliteit [National multidisciplinary guideline for subfertility care]. NVOG; 2010
   Google Scholar
• Hammarberg K, Fisher JR, Wynter KH. Psychological and social aspects of pregnancy, childbirth and early parenting after assisted conception: a systematic review. Hum Reprod Update 2008;14:395–414
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chachamovich JR, Chachamovich E, Ezer H, et al. Investigating quality of life and health-related quality of life in infertility: a systematic review. J Psychosom Obstet Gynaecol 2010;31:101–10
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Obeisat S, Gharaibeh MK, Oweis A, Gharaibeh H. Adversities of being infertile: the experience of Jordanian women. Fertil Steril 2012;98:444–9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nyboe AA, Goossens V, Bhattacharya S, et al. Assisted reproductive technology and intrauterine inseminations in Europe, 2005: results generated from European registers by ESHRE: ESHRE. The European IVF Monitoring Programme (EIM), for the European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology (ESHRE). Hum Reprod 2009;24:1267–87
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perinatal Registry (PRN foundation). Perinatal Care in the Netherland 2010. Utrecht: The Perinatal Registry; 2013
   Google Scholar
• College voor zorgverzekeringen. Verloskundig Vademecum [Obstetric Manual]. Diemen: College voor zorgverzekeringen; 2003
   Google Scholar
• Wiegers TA, Janssen BM. Monitor verloskundige zorgverlening, najaar 2004 [Monitor midwifery care, autumn 2004]. Utrecht: NIVEL; 2005
   Google Scholar
• de Boer J, Zeeman K. Prenatale verloskundige begeleiding [Prenatal midwifery care]. Utrecht: Koninklijke Nederlandse Organisatie van Verloskundigen; 2008
   Google Scholar
• Allen VM, Wilson RD, Cheung A. Pregnancy outcomes after assisted reproductive technology. J Obstet Gynaecol Can 2006;28:220–50
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Verhaak CM, Smeenk JMJ, Evers AWM. Women’s emotional adjustment to IVF: a systemic review of 25 years of research. Hum Reprod Update 2007;13:27–36
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bateman S. When reproductive freedom encounters medical responsibility: changing conceptions of reproductive choice. In: Vayena ERPJG, ed. Current practices and controversies in assisted reproduction. Report of a meeting of “Medical, Ethical and Social Aspects of Assisted Reproduction” held at WHO Headquarters in Geneva, Switzerland 17–21 September 2001. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2002:320–32
   Google Scholar
• Olshansky E, Sereika S. The transition from pregnancy to postpartum in previously infertile women: a focus on depression. Arch Psychiatr Nurs 2005;19:273–80
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Redshaw M, Hockley C, Davidson LL. A qualitative study of the experience of treatment for infertility among women who successfully became pregnant. Hum Reprod 2007;22:295–304
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Allan H, Finnerty G. The practice gap in the care of women following successful infertility treatments: unasked research questions in midwifery and nursing. Hum Fertil (Camb) 2007;10:99–104
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Allan H, Finnerty G. Motherhood following successful infertility treatment. In: Hunter B, Deery R. eds. Emotion in midwifery and reproduction; Part II: Emotion work and infertility. Suffolk, The Lavenham Press; 2009
   Google Scholar
• Gameiro S, Canavarro M, Moura-Ramos M, et al. Social nesting: changes in social network and support across the transition to parenthood in couples that conceived spontaneously or through assisted reproductive technologies. J Fam Psychol 2010;24:175–87
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Younger M, Hollins-Martin C, Choucri L. Individualised care for women with assisted conception pregnancies and midwifery practice implications: an analysis of the existing research and current practice. Midwifery 2015;31:265–70
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mackenzie N, Knipe S. Research dilemmas: paradigms, methods and methodology. Issues Educ Res 2006;16:193–205
   Google Scholar
• Boeije H. Analyseren in kwalitatief onderzoek [Analysis in qualitative research]. Den Haag: Boom Lemma Uitgevers; 2008
   Google Scholar
• Tong A, Sainsbury P, Craig J. Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ). Int J Qual Health Care 2007;19:349–57
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Darwiche J, Maillard F, Germond M, et al. The transition of care from fertility specialists to gyneacologists: maternal adjustment and postpartum depressive symptoms. Womens Health (Lond Engl) 2013;9:109–18
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Seefat-van Teeffelen A, Nieuwenhuijze M, Korstjens I. Women want proactive psycho-social support from midwives during transition to motherhood: a qualitative study. Midwifery 2010;27:122–7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Darvill R, Skirton H, Farrand P. Psychological factors that impact on women's experiences of first-time motherhood: a qualitative study of the transition. Midwifery 2010;26:357–66
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boivin J, Takefman JE. Impact of the in-vitro fertilization process on emotional, physical and relational variables. Hum Reprod 1996;11:903–7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Klerk C, Macklon NS, Heijnen EM, et al. The psychological impact of IVF failure after two or more cycles of IVF with a mild versus standard treatment strategy. Hum Reprod 2007;22:2554–8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hjelmstedt A, Widstrom AM, Wramsby H, et al. Personality factors and emotional responses to pregnancy among IVF couples in early pregnancy: a comparative study. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2003;82:152–61
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hjelmstedt A, Widstrom AM, Wramsby H, Collins A. Emotional adaptation following successful in vitro fertilization. Fertil Steril 2004;81:1254–64
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rimm AA, Katayama AC. Reproductive technologies and the risk of birth defects. N Engl J Med. 2012;367:874–5; author reply 875–6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Warmelink JC, Stramrood CA, Paarlberg KM, et al. Posttraumatic stress disorder, anxiety and depression following pregnancies conceived through fertility treatments: the effects of medically assisted conception on postpartum well-being. J Reprod Med 2012;57:115–22
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davies MJ, Moore VM, Willson KJ, et al. Reproductive technologies and the risk of birth defects. N Engl J Med 2012;366:1803–13
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Land JA, Evers JLH. Risks and complications in assisted reproduction techniques: report of an ESHRE consensus meeting. Hum Reprod 2003;18:455–7
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hansen M, Bower C, Milne E, et al. Assisted reproductive technologies and the risk of birth defects – a systematic review. Hum Reprod 2005;20:328–38
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McDonald SD, Han Z, Mulla S, et al. Preterm birth and low birth weight among in-vitro-fertilization singletons: a systematic review and meta-analyses. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2009;146:138–48
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reefhuis J, Honein MA, Schieve LA, et al. Assisted reproductive technology and major structural birth defects in the United States. Hum Reprod 2009;24:360–6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wisborg K, Ingerslev HJ, Henriksen TB. IVF and stillbirth: a prospective follow-up study. Hum Reprod 2010;25:1312–6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seggers J, de Walle HE, Bergman JE, et al. Congenital anomalies in offspring of subfertile couples: a registry-based study in the northern Netherlands. Fertil Steril 2015;103:1001–10 e3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Papaharitou S, Nakopoulou E, Moraitou M. Assisted reproduction and midwives: student and certified midwives educational needs on reproductive biology. Sex Reprod Healthcare 2010;1:163–8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar