References
- Donoghue v. Stevenson [1932]All ER Rep1 ; [1932] AC 562; House of Lords.
- Caparo Industries plc v Dickman 2 AC 605.
- Bolam v Friern Hospital Management Committee [1957] 1 WLR 583.
- Hucks v Cole [1993] 4 Med LR 393.
- Bolitho v. City and Hackney Health Authority 4 All ER 771.
- Maynard v. West Midlands Regional Health Authority [1985] 1 All ER 635.
- Sidaway v. Bethlem Royal Hospital Governors [1985] AC 871.
- Whitehouse v Jordan [1981] 1 WLR 246 HL at 256.
- Roe v Minister of Health [1954] 2 All ER 131.
- Thompson and others v Smiths Shiprepairers (North Shields) Ltd [1984]. QB405; [1984] 1 All ER 881, QBD.
- Molyneux AJ, Kerr RSC, Yu LM, for the International Subarachnoid Aneurysm trial (ISAT) Collaborative Group. International Subarachnoid Aneurysm Trial (ISAT) of neurosurgical clipping versus endovascular coiling in 2143 patients with ruptured intracranial aneurysms: a randomised comparison of effects on survival, dependency, seizures, rebleeding, subgroups, and aneurysm occlusion. Lancet 2005;366:809–17.
- Case: Cerebral aneurysm ruptured during surgery: Mr KT (By his Mother and Litigation Friend Mrs FT) v Southampton University Hospitals NHS Trust. Clin Risk 2011;17:237–238.
- Wilsher v Essex Area Health Authority 1988 AC 1074 (HL).
- Knight v Home Office [1993]. All ER237.
- Brooks v Home Office [1999] 2FLR 233 QBD.
- Bull v Devon AHA [1993] 4 MED LR 117 (CA).
- R v. Adomako (1994) 3 All ER 79.
- R v Prentice [1994] Q3 302.
- R v Misra & Srivistava [2004]. EWCA Crim 2375.