Nanocrystalline hydroxyapatite intervertebral cages induce fusion after anterior cervical discectomy and may be a safe alternative to PEEK or carbon fiber intervertebral cages

References

• Bailey RW, Badgley CE. Stabilization of the cervical spine by anterior fusion. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1960;42:565–94.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cloward RB. The anterior approach for removal of ruptured cervical disks. J Neurosurg 1958;15:602–17.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith GW, Robinson RA. The treatment of certain cervical-spine disorders by anterior removal of the intervertebral disc and interbody fusion. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1958;40:607–24.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wigfield CC, Nelson RJ. Nonautologous interbody fusion materials in cervical spine surgery: how strong is the evidence to justify their use? Spine 2001;26:687–94.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jacobs W, Willems PC, Kruyt M, et al. Systematic review of anterior interbody fusion techniques for single- and double-level cervical degenerative disc disease. Spine 2011;36:E950–60.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kersten RF, van Gaalen SM, de Gast A, Oner FC. Polyetheretherketone (PEEK) cages in cervical applications: a systematic review. Spine J 2013;15:1446–60.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vavruch L, Hedlund R, Javid D, et al. A prospective randomized comparison between the cloward procedure and a carbon fiber cage in the cervical spine: a clinical and radiologic study. Spine 2002;27:1694–701.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lakey JRT, Mirbolooki M, Rogers C, Mohr J. Supply of human allograft tissue in Canada. Cell Tissue Bank 2007;8:135–50.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Yoshii T, Yuasa M, Sotome S, et al. Porous/dense composite hydroxyapatite for anterior cervical discectomy and fusion. Spine 2013;38:833–40.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim SC, Kang SW, Kim SH, et al. Clinical and radiological outcomes of anterior cervical interbody fusion using hydroxyapatite spacer. J Korean Neurosurg Soc 2009;46:300.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Qin Z, Gautieri A, Nair AK, et al. Thickness of hydroxyapatite nanocrystal controls mechanical properties of the collagen-hydroxyapatite interface. Langmuir 2012;28:1982–92.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robbins S, Lauryssen C, Songer MN. Use of nanocrystalline hydroxyapatite with autologous BMA and local bone in the lumbar spine: a retrospective CT analysis of posterolateral fusion results. J Spinal Disord Tech 2014. [Epub ahead of print]. doi: 10.1097/BSD.0000000000000091.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Dorozhkin SV. Calcium orthophosphate coatings on magnesium and its biodegradable alloys. Acta Biomater 2014;10:2919–34.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guo X, Gough JE, Xiao P, et al. Fabrication of nanostructured hydroxyapatite and analysis of human osteoblastic cellular response. J Biomed Mater Res – Part A 2007;82:1022–32.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Biomechanical assessment and evaluation of the nanoss cervical interbody fusion device system. Unpublished internal document. Pioneer Surgical Technology; 9 Feb 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Bartels RH, Donk R, Verbeek AL. No justification for cervical disk prostheses in clinical practice: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Neurosurgery 2010;66:1153–60.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rao RD, Gourab K, David KS. Operative treatment of cervical spondylotic myelopathy. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2006;88:1619–40.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Webster TJ, Ergun C, Doremus RH, et al. Enhanced functions of osteoblasts on nanophase ceramics. Biomaterials 2000;21:1803–10.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schnettler R, Stahl JP, Alt V, et al. Calcium phosphate-based bone substitutes. Eur J Trauma 2004;30:219–29.
   Google Scholar
• Laschke MW, Witt K, Pohlemann T, Menger MD. Injectable nanocrystalline hydroxyapatite paste for bone substitution: in vivo analysis of biocompatibility and vascularization. J Biomed Mater Res Part B Appl Biomater 2007;82:494–505.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chris Arts JJ, Verdonschot N, Schreurs BW, Buma P. The use of a bioresorbable nano-crystalline hydroxyapatite paste in acetabular bone impaction grafting. Biomaterials 2006;27:1110–18.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bebnowski D, Hanggi MP, Markic G, et al. Cervical vertebrae anomalies in subjects with Class II malocclusion assessed by lateral cephalogram and cone beam computed tomography. Eur J Orthod 2012;34:226–31.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rottke D, Patzelt S, Poxleitner P, Schulze D. Effective dose span of ten different cone beam CT devices. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2013;42:20120417. doi: 10.1259/dmfr.20120417.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vandevenne J,E, Peuskens D, Wijnen L, Wuyts J. Cone beam CT to assess bony fusion following anterior cervical interbody fusion. Eur Spine J 2015. [Epub ahead of print]. doi: 10.1007/s00586-015-4248-8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar