References
- Brooks N, Campsie L, Symington C, Beattie A, McKinlay W. The five year outcome of severe blunt head injury: A relative's view. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery and Psychiatry 1986; 49: 764–770
- Hoofien D, Gilboa A, Vakil E, Donovick PJ. Traumatic brain injury (TBI) 10-20 years later: A comprehensive outcome study of psychiatric symptomatology, cognitive abilities and psychosocial functioning. Brain Injury 2001; 15: 189–209
- Dikmen S, Machamer JE, Powell JM, Temkin NR. Outcome 3 to 5 years after moderate to severe traumatic brain injury. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 2003; 84: 1449–1455
- Colantonio A, Ratcliff G, Chase S, Kelsey S, Escobar M, Vernich L. Long-term outcomes after moderate to severe traumatic brain injury. Disability and Rehabilitation 2004; 26: 2532–2561
- Hammond FM, Grattan KD, Sasser H, Corrigan JD, Rosenthal M, Bushnik T, Shull W. Five years after traumatic brain injury: A study of individual outcomes and predictors of change in function. Neurorehabilitation 2004; 19: 25–36
- Mailhan L, Azouvi P, Dazord A. Life Satisfaction and disability after severe traumatic brain injury. Brain Injury 2005; 19: 227–238
- Ratcliff G, Colantonio A, Escobar M, Chase S, Vernich L. Long-term survival following traumatic brain injury. Disability and Rehabilitation 2005; 27: 305–314
- Wood RL, Rutterford NA. Psychosocial adjustment 17 years after severe brain injury. Journal of Neurology Neurosurgery and Psychiatry 2006; 77: 71–73
- Manchester D, Priestley N, Jackson H. The assessment of executive functions: Coming out of the office. Brain injury 2004; 18: 1067–1081
- Titov N, Knight RG. A computer-based procedure for assessing functional cognitive skills in patients with neurological injuries: The virtual street. Brain Injury 2005; 19: 315–322
- Dawson DR, Anderson ND, Burgess P, Cooper E, Krpan KM, Stuss DT. Further development of the Multiple Errands Test: Standardized scoring, reliability, and ecological validity for the Baycrest version. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 2009; 90: S41–S51
- Wood RLL, Liossi C. The ecological validity of executive tests in a severely brain injured sample. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology 2006; 21: 429–437
- Satish U, Streufert S, Eslinger PJ. Stimulation-based executive cognitive assessment and rehabilitation after traumatic frontal lobe injury: A case report. Disability and Rehabilitation 2008; 30: 468–478
- Temple RO, Zgaljardic DJ, Abreu BC, Seale GS, Ostir GV, Ottenbacher KJ. Ecological validity of the neuropsychological assessment battery screening module in post-acute brain injury rehabilitation. Brain Injury 2009; 23: 45–50
- Cicerone KD. The enigma of executive functioning: theroretical contributions to therapeutic interventions. Neuropsychological interventions, PJ Eslinger. Guilford Press, New York 2002; 246–265
- Cicerone KD, Levin H, Malec J, Stuss D, Whyte J. Cognitive rehabilitation interventions for executive function: Moving from bench to bedside in patients with traumatic brain injury. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 2006; 18: 1212–1222
- Wilson BA, Alderman N, Burgess PW, Emslie H, Evans JJ. Behavioural assessment of the dysexecutive syndrome. Thames Valley Test Co, Bury St. Edmunds 1996
- MacDonald S, Johnson CJ. Assessment of subtle cognitive-communication deficits following acquired brain injury: A normative study of the Functional Assessment of Verbal Reasoning and Executive Strategies (FAVRES). Brain Injury 2005; 19: 895–902
- Levine B, Dawson D, Boutet I, Schwartz ML, Stuss D. Assessement of strategic self-regulation in traumatic brain injury: Its relationship to injury severity and psychosocial outcome. Neuropsychology 2000; 14: 491–500
- Robertson IH, Manly T, Andrade J, Baddeley BT, Yiend J. “Oops!”: Performance correlates of everyday attentional failures in traumatic brain injured and normal subjects. Neuropsychologia 1997; 35: 747–758
- Bottari C, Clement D, Rainville C, Dutil E. The criterion-related validity of the IADL Profile with measures of executive functions, indices of trauma severity and sociodemographic characteristics. Brain Injury 2009; 23: 322–335
- Shallice T, Burgess PW. Deficits in strategy application following frontal lobe damage in man. Brain 1991; 114: 727–741
- de Guise E, LeBlanc J, Feyz M, Meyer K, Duplantie J, Thomas H, Abouassaly M, Champoux M-C, Couturier C, Lin H, et al. Long-term outcome after severe traumatic brain injury: The McGill interdisciplinary prospective study. Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation 2008; 23: 294–303
- Granger CV, Cotter AC, Hamilton BB, Fielder RC. Functional assessment scales: A study of persons with multiple sclerosis. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 1990; 71: 870–875
- Guo YE, Togher L. The impact of dysarthria on everyday communication after traumatic brain injury: A pilot study. Brain Injury 2008; 22: 83–97
- Togher L, Hand L, Code C. Analysing discourse in the traumatic brain injury population: Telephone interactions with different communication partners. Brain Injury 1997; 11: 169–189
- Higginson CI, Johnson-Greene D, Langrall S. Neurocognitive predictors of performance on a telephone task following stroke. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology 2010; 32: 525–535
- Levin HS, High WM, Goethe KE, Sisson RA, Overall JE, Rhoades HM, Eisenberg HM, Kalisky Z, Gary HE. The neurobehavioural rating scale: Assessment of the behavioural sequelae of head injury by the clinician. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery and Psychiatry 1987; 50: 183–193
- Teasdale G, Jennett B. Assessment of coma and impaired consciousness: A practical scale. Lancet 1974; 2: 81–84