Specific attention disorders in drivers with traumatic brain injury

References

• Formisano R, Bivona U, Brunelli S, Giustini M, Longo E, Taggi F. A preliminary investigation of road traffic accident rate after severe brain injury. Brain Injury 2005; 19: 159–163
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schultheis MT, Rebimbas J, Mourant R, Millis SR. Examining usability of a virtual reality driving simulator. Assistive Technology 2007; 19: 1–8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rapport LJ, Hanks RA, Bryer RC. Barriers to driving and community integration after traumatic brain injury. Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation 2006; 21: 34–44
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lew HL, Poole JH, Lee EH, Jaffe DL, Huang H-C, Brodd E. Predictive validity of driving-simulator assessments following traumatic brain injury: A preliminary study. Brain Injury 2005; 19: 177–188
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coleman RD, Rapport LJ, Ergh TC, Hanks RA, Ricker JH, Millis SR. Predictors of driving outcome after traumatic brain injury. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 2002; 83: 1415–1422
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schneider JJ, Gouvier WD. Utility of the UFOV test with mild traumatic brain injury. Applied Neuropsychology 2005; 12: 138–142
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brouwer, WH. Attention and driving: a cognitive neuropsychological approach. Applied neuropsychology of attention, P Zimmermann, M Leclercq. Psychology Press, Hove 2002; 223–248
   Google Scholar
• Kahneman D. Attention and effort. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ 1973
   Google Scholar
• Strayer DL, Drews FA, Johnston WA. Cell phone-induced failures of visual attention during simulated driving. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied 2003; 9: 23–32
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Zomeren AH, Van den Burg W. Residual complaints of patients two years after severe head injury. Journal of Neurology Neurosurgery and Psychiatry 1985; 48: 21–28
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Azouvi P, Couillet J, Leclercq M, Martin Y, Asloun S, Rousseaux M. Divided attention and mental effort after severe traumatic brain injury. Neuropsychologia 2004; 42: 1260–1268
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park NW, Moscovitch M, Robertson IH. Divided attention impairments after traumatic brain injury. Neuropsychologia 1999; 37: 1119–1133
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ponsford J, Kinsella G. Attentional deficits following closed-head injury. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology 1992; 14: 822–838
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fujii D, Ahmed I, Hishinuma E. A neuropsychological comparison of psychotic disorder following traumatic brain injury, traumatic brain injury without psychotic disorder, and schizophrenia. Journal of Neuropsychiatry & Clinical Neurosciences 2004; 16: 306–314
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stroop JR. Studies of interference in serial verbal reactions. Journal of Experimental Psychology 1935; 18: 643–662
   Google Scholar
• Brickenkamp R. D2, Test d’Attention concentrée: Manuel. Les Editions du Centre de Psychologie Appliquée, Paris 1994
   Google Scholar
• Zimmermann P, Fimm B. Testbatterie zur Aufmerksamkeitsprüfung (TAP). Psytest, Würselen 1994
   Google Scholar
• Franconeri SL, Simons DJ. Moving and looming stimuli capture attention. Perception and Psychophysics 2003; 65: 999–1010
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Zomeren AH, Bergego C, Azouvi P. Attentional disorders after severe closed head injury (CHI). Neuropsychologie des Traumatismes Crâniens Graves de l’Adulte. Frison-Roche, Paris 1995; 133–146
   Google Scholar
• Posner MI. Chronometric explorations of mind. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ 1978
   Google Scholar
• Van Zomeren AH, Brouwer WH. Clinical neuropsychology of attention. Oxford University Press, New York 1994
   Google Scholar
• Azouvi P, Couillet J, Agar N. Troubles de l’attention après traumatisme crânien sévère: Aspects théoriques et rééducation. Revue de Neuropsychologie 1998; 8: 125–154
   Google Scholar
• Michael GA, Garcia S, Bussy G, François-Lion L, Guibaud L. Reactivity to visual signals and the cerebellar vermis: Evidence from a rare case with Rhombencephalosynapsis. Behavioral Neuroscience 2009; 123: 86–96
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aron AR. The neural basis of inhibition in cognitive control. Neuroscientist 2007; 13: 214–228
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vakil E, Weisz H, Jedwab L, Groswasser Z, Aberbuch S. Stroop color-word task as a measure of selective attention: Efficiency in closed-head-injured patients. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology 1995; 17: 335–342
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Collet C, Clarion A, Morel M, Chapon A, Petit C. Physiological and behavioural changes associated to managing a secondary task while driving. Applied Ergonomics 2009; 40: 1041–1046
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strayer DL, Johnston WA. Driven to distraction: Dual-task studies of simulated driving and conversing on a cellular telephone. Psychological Science 2001; 12: 462–466
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leclercq M, Zimmermann P. L'évaluation des fonctions attentionnelles. Traité de neuropsychologie clinique. Tome 1, X Seron, M Van der Linden. Solal, Marseille 2000; 95–114
   Google Scholar
• Leclercq M. Rééducation cognitive de l2attention divisée chez un adulte victime d'un traumatisme crânien sévère: étude d'un casLa Neuropsychologie de l'attention, J Couillet, M Leclercq, C Moroni, P Azouvi. Solal, Marseille 2002; 277–294
   Google Scholar
• McDowell S, Whyte J, D'Esposito M. Working memory impairments in traumatic brain injury: Evidence from a dual-task paradigm. Neuropsychologia 1997; 35: 1341–1353
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wickens CD. Processing resources in attention. Varieties of attention, R Parasuraman, DR Davies. Academic Press, New York 1984; 63–102
   Google Scholar