Describing conversations between individuals with traumatic brain injury (TBI) and communication partners following communication partner training: Using exchange structure analysis

References

• De Silva MJ, Roberts I, Perel P, Edwards P, Kenward MG, Fernandes J, Shakur H, Patel V. Patient outcome after traumatic brain injury in high-, middle- and low-income countries: analysis of data on 8927 patients in 46 countries. International Journal of Epidemiology 2009;38:452–458
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hyder A, Wunderlich C, Puvanachandra P, Gururaj G, Kobusingye O. The impact of traumatic brain injuries: A global perspective. Neurorehabilitation 2007;22:341–353
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McDonald S, Togher L, Code C, editors. Communication disorders following traumatic brain injury. Hove, UK: Psychology Press; 1999
   Google Scholar
• Wedcliffe T, Ross E. The psychological effects of traumatic brain injury on the quality of life of a group of spouses/partners. South African Journal of Communication Disorders [die Suid- Afrikaanse Tydskrif vir Kommunikasieafwykings] 2001;48:77–99
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Coelho CA. Management of discourse deficits following traumatic brain injury: Progress, caveats, and needs. Seminars in Speech and Language 2007;28:122–135
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Murdoch B, Theodoros D, editors. Traumatic brain injury: associated speech, language, and swallowing disorders. San Diego, CA: Singular Thomson Learning; 2001
   Google Scholar
• Douglas JM. Relation of executive functioning to pragmatic outcome following severe traumatic brain injury. Journal of Speech, Language & Hearing Research 2010;53:365–382
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bond F, Godfrey HPD. Conversation with traumatically brain-injured individuals: A controlled study of behavioural changes and their impact. Brain Injury 1997;11:319–329
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coelho CA, Youse KM, Le KN. Conversational discourse in closed-head-injured and non-brain-injured adults. Aphasiology 2002;16:659–672
   Google Scholar
• Galski T, Tompkins C, Johnston MV. Competence in discourse as a measure of social integration and quality of life in persons with traumatic brain injury. Brain Injury 1998;12:769–782
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O'Flaherty C, Douglas J. Living with cognitve-communication difficulties following traumatic brain injury: Using a model of interpersonal communication to characterize the subjective experience. Brain Injury 1997;11:889–1011
   Google Scholar
• Dahlberg C, Hawley L, Morey C, Newman J, Cusick CP, Harrison-Felix C. Social communication skills in persons with post-acute traumatic brain injury: Three perspectives. Brain Injury 2006;20:425-435
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burleigh S, Farber R, Gillard M. Community integration and life satisfaction after traumatic brain injury: Long-term findings. American Journal of Occupational Therapy 1998;52:45–52
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koskinen S. Quality of life 10 years after a very severe traumatic brain injury (TBI): The perspective of the injured and the closest relative. Brain Injury 1998;12:631–648
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Isaki E, Turkstra L. Communication abilities and work reentry following traumatic brain injury. Brain Injury 2000;14:441–453
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Snow PC, Douglas JM, Ponsford JL. Narrative discourse following severe traumatic brain injury: A longitudinal follow-up. Aphasiology 1999;13:529–551
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnston M, Shawaryn M, Malec J, Kreutzer JS, Hammond F. The structure of functional and commnity outcomes following traumatic brain injury. Brain Injury 2006;20:391–407
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rao V, Lyketsos C. Neuropsychiatric sequelae of traumatic brain injury. Psychomatics 2000;41:95–103
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lane-Brown A, Tate R. Apathy after traumatic brain injury: An overview of the current state of play. Brain Impairment 2011;12:43–53
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tate R. Executive dysfunction and characterological changes after traumatic brain injury: Two sides of the same coin? Cortex 1999;35:39–55
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Godfrey HPD, Shum D. Executive functioning and the application of social skills following traumatic brain injury. Aphasiology 2000;14:433–444
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Auerbach S. Neuroanatomical correlates of attention and memory disorder in traumatic brain injury: An application of neurobehavioural subtypes. Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation 1986;3:1–12
   Google Scholar
• Hartley LL, Jensen PJ. Three discourse profiles of closed-head-injury speakers: Theoretical and clinical implications. Brain Injury 1992;6:271–281
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bellack A. Recurrent problems in the behavioural assessment of social skill. Behavioural Research and Therapy 1983;21:29–41
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruff R, Camenzuli L. Research challenges for behavioural rehabilitation: Searching for solutions. In: Kreutzer JS, Wehman P, editors. Cognitive rehabilitation for persons with traumatic brain injury: A functional approach. Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes; 1991. p 23–34
   Google Scholar
• Snow P, Douglas J, Ponsford J. Conversational assessment following traumatic brain injury: A comparison across two control groups. Brain Injury 1997;11:409–429
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levin H, Hanten G. Executive functions after traumatic brain injury in children. Pediatric Neurology 2005;33:79–93
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Worrall L, McCooey R, Davidson B, Larkins B, Hickson L. The validity of functional assessments of communication and the Activity/Participation components of the ICIDH-2: Do they reflect what really happens in real-life? Journal of Communication Disorders 2002;35:107–137
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Snow PC, Douglas JM, Ponsford JL. Discourse assessment following traumatic brain injury: A pilot study examining some demographic and methodological issues. Brain Injury 1995;9:365–380
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Biddle KR, McCabe A, Bliss LS. Narrative skills following traumatic brain injury in children and adults. Journal of Communication Disorders 1996;29:447–469
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coelho CA. Discourse production deficits following traumatic brain injury: A critical review of the recent literature. Aphasiology 1995;9:409–429
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jorgensen M, Togher L. Narrative after traumatic brain injury: A comparison of monologic and jointly-produced discourse. Brain Injury 2009;23:727–740
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Leer E, Turkstra L. The effect of elicitation task on discourse coherence and cohesion in adolescents with brain injury. Journal of Communication Disorders 1999;32:327–349
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hough MS, Barrow I. Descriptive discourse abilities of traumatic brain-injured adults. Aphasiology 2003;17:183
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coelho CA, Liles BZ, Duffy RJ. Discourse analysis with closed head injured adults: Evidence for differing patterns of deficits. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 1991;72:465–468
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hartley LL, Jensen PJ. Narrative and procedural discourse after closed head injury. Brain Injury 1991;6:271–281
   Google Scholar
• McDonald S. Pragmatic language skills after closed head injury: Ability to meet the information needs of the listener. Brain and Language 1993;44:28–46
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mentis M, Prutting CA. Cohesion in the discourse of normal and head injured adults. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research 1987;30:88–98
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Snow PC, Douglas JM, Ponsford JL. Procedural discourse following traumatic brain injury. Aphasiology 1997;11:947–967
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coelho CA, Liles BZ, Duffy RJ. Analysis of conversational discourse in head-injured adults. Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation 1991;6:92–99
   Google Scholar
• Kilov AM, Togher L, Grant S. Problem solving with friends: Discourse participation and performance of individuals with and without traumatic brain injury. Aphasiology 2009;23:584–605
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Togher L, Hand L, Code C. Measuring service encounters with the traumatic brain injury population. Aphasiology 1997;11:491–504
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tu LV, Togher L, Power E. The impact of communication partner and discourse task on a person with traumatic brain injury: The use of multiple perspectives. Brain Injury 2011;25:560–580
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coelho CA, Youse KM, Le KN, Feinn R. Narrative and conversational discourse of adults with closed head injuries and non-brain-injured adults: A discriminant analysis. Aphasiology 2003;17:499–510
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Larkins B, Worrall L, Hickson L. Everyday communication activities of individuals with traumatic brain injury living in New Zealand. Asia Pacific Journal of Speech, Language and Hearing 1999;4:183–191
   Google Scholar
• Togher L. Giving information: The importance of context on communicative opportunity for people with traumatic brain injury. Aphasiology 2000;14:365–390
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Body R, Parker M. Topic repetitiveness after traumatic brain injury: An emergent, jointly managed behaviour. Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics 2005;19:379–392
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eggins S, Slade D. Analysing casual conversation. London: Cassell; 1997
   Google Scholar
• Coelho CA. Discourse analysis in traumatic brain injury. In: McDonald S, Togher L, Code C, editors. Communication disorders following traumatic brain injury. Hove, UK: Psychology Press; 1999
   Google Scholar
• Rousseaux M, Vérigneaux C, Kozlowski O. An analysis of communication in conversation after severe traumatic brain injury. European Journal of Neurology 2010;17:922–929
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Snow PC, Douglas JM, Ponsford JL. Conversational discourse abilities following severe traumatic brain injury: A follow-up study. Brain Injury 1998;12:911–935
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mentis M, Prutting CA. Analysis of topic as illustrated in a head injured and a normal adult. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research 1991;34:583–595
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Togher L, Power E, Tate R, McDonald S, Rietdijk R. Measuring the social interactions of people with traumatic brain injury and their communication partners: The adapted Kagan scales. Aphasiology 2010;24:914–927
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shelton C, Shryock M. Effectiveness of communication/interaction strategies with patients who have neurological injuries in a rehabilitation setting. Brain Injury 2007;21:1259–1266
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McDonald S, Tate R, Togher L, Bornhofen C, Long E, Gertler P, Bowen R. Social skills treatment for people with severe, chronic acquired brain injuries: A multicenter trial. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 2008;89:1648–1659
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Halliday MAK. An introduction to functional grammar. London: Edward Arnold; 1994
   Google Scholar
• Togher L, Hand L, Code C. Exchanges of information in the talk of people with traumatic brain injury. In: McDonald S, Togher L, Code C, editors. Communication disorders following traumatic brain injury. Hove, UK: Psychology Press; 1999
   Google Scholar
• Togher L, Hand L, Code C. Analysing discourse in the traumatic brain injury population: Telephone interactions with different communication partners. Brain Injury 1997;11:169–190
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Togher L. Discourse sampling in the 21st century. Journal of Communication Disorders 2001;34:131–150
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Togher L, Hand L, Code C. Analysing discourse in the traumatic brain injury population: Telephone interactions with different communication partners. Brain Injury 1997;11:169–189
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Togher L, Taylor C, Arid V, Grant S. The impact of varied speaker role and communication partner on the communicative interactions of a person with traumatic brain injury: A single case study using Systemic Functional Linguistics. Brain Impairment 2006;7:190–201
   Google Scholar
• Turkstra L, Brehm SE, Montgomery EB. Analysing conversational discourse after traumatic brain injury: Isn't it about time? Brain Impairment 2006;7:234–245
   Google Scholar
• Dahlberg C, Cusick C, Hawley L, Newman JK, Morey CE, Harrison-Felix CL, Whiteneck GG. Treatment efficacy of social communication skills training after traumatic brain injury: A randomized treatment and deferred treatment controlled trial. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 2007;88:1561–1573
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ylvisaker M, Turkstra L, Coelho C. Behavioral and social interventions for individuals with traumatic brain injury: A summary of the research with clinical implications. Seminars in Speech & Language 2005;26:256–267
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Togher L, McDonald S, Code C. Training communication partners of people with traumatic brain injury: A randomised controlled trial. Aphasiology 2004;18:313–335
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ripich DN. Functional communication with AD patients: A caregiver training program. Alzheimer Disease and Associated Disorders 1994;8:96–109
   Google Scholar
• Simmons-Mackie N, Raymer A, Armstrong E, Holland A, Cherney L. Communication partner training in aphasia: A systematic review. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 2010;91:1813–1837
   Google Scholar
• Turner S, Whitworth A. Conversational partner training programmes in aphasia: A review of key themes and participants' roles. Aphasiology 2006;20:483–510
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cunningham R, Ward C. Evaluation of a training programme to facilitate conversation between people with aphasia and their partners. Aphasiology 2003;17:687–707
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hopper T, Holland A, Rewega M. Conversational coaching: Treatment outcomes and future directions. Aphasiology 2002;16:745–761
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kagan A, Black SE, Duchan JF, Simmons-Mackie N, Square P. Training volunteers as conversation partners using ‘Supported Conversation for Adults with Aphasia' (SCA): A controlled trial. Journal of Speech, Language & Hearing Research 2001;44:624
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldblum G, Alant E. Sales assistants serving customers with traumatic brain injury. Aphasiology 2009;23:87–109
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson K, Davis P. A supported relationships intervention to increase the social integration of persons with traumatic brain injuries. Behavior Modification 1998;22:502–528
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bogart E, Togher L, Power E, Docking K. Casual conversations between individuals with traumatic brain injury and their friends. Brain Injury 2012;26:221–233
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ylvisaker M, Sellars C, Edelman L. Rehabilitation after traumatic brain injury in preschoolers. In: Ylvisaker M. Traumatic brain injury rehabilitation. Children and adolescents. Newton, MA: Butterworth-Heinemann; 1998. p 303–329
   Google Scholar
• Togher L, McDonald S, Tate RL, Power E, Rietdijk R. Training communication partners of people with traumatic brain injury: Reporting the protocol for a clinical trial. Brain Impairment 2009;10:188–204
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Togher L, McDonald S, Tate R, Power E, Rietdijk R. Communication skills of people with severe traumatic brain injury can be improved by training everyday communication partners: Findings from a single-blind multi-centre clinical trial. Isle of Palms, SC: Clinical Aphasiology Conference; 23-27 May 2010
   Google Scholar
• Snow PC, Ponsford JL. Assessing and managing impairment of consciousness following TBI. In: Ponsford J, Sloan S, Snow P, editors. Traumatic brain injury: Rehabilitation for everyday adaptive living. East Sussex: Erlbaum (UK) Taylor & Francis; 1995
   Google Scholar
• Wechsler D. Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale - Third Edition (WAIS-III). San Antonio, TX: The Psychological Corporation; 1997
   Google Scholar
• Adamovich B, Henderson J. Scales of cognitive ability for traumatic brain injury. Chicago, IL: The Riverside Publishing Company; 1992
   Google Scholar
• Togher L, McDonald S, Tate R, Power E, Ylvisaker M, Rietdijk R. TBI express: For people with TBI and their everyday conversational partners. Sydney: The Australian Society for the Study of Brain Impairment (ASSIBI); 2010
   Google Scholar
• Boles L, Bombard T. Conversational discourse analysis: Appropriate and useful sample sizes. Aphasiology 1998;12:547–560
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ventola E. The structure of social interaction: A systemic approach to the semiotics of service encounters. London: Pinter; 1987
   Google Scholar
• Togher L. An analysis of interpersonal meanings: An introduction for speech pathologists. Sydney: Faculty of Health Sciences, The University of Sydney; 1998
   Google Scholar
• SPSS. IBM SPSS Statistics 20 for Windows. Chicago, IL: IBM; 2011
   Google Scholar
• Perneger TV. What's wrong with Bonferroni adjustments. British Medical Journal 1998;316:1236–1238
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Argyrous G. Statistics for research with a guide to SPSS. London: Sage Publications; 2005
   Google Scholar
• Field A. Discovering statistics using SPSS - Third edition. London: SAGE Publications Ltd; 2009
   Google Scholar
• McDonald S. Functional assessment of verbal reasoning and executive strategies. Ontario, Canada: CCD Publishing; 2005
   Google Scholar
• McDonald S, Flanagan S, Rollins J. The awareness of social inference test. Edmonds, England: Thames Valley Test Company; 2002
   Google Scholar