Relationships after TBI: A grounded research study

References

• Faul M, Xu L, Wald MM, Coronado VG. Traumatic brain injury in the United States: Emergency department visits, hospitalizations, and deaths. Atlanta, GA: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Injury Prevention and Control; 2010
   Google Scholar
• Hoge CW, McGurk D, Thomas JL, Cox AL, Engel CC, Castro CA. Mild traumatic brain injury in U.S. soldiers returning from Iraq. New England Journal of Medicine 2008;358:453–463
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Langlois JA, Rutland-Brown W, Wald MM. The epidemiology and impact of traumatic brain injury: A brief overview. Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation 2006;21:375–378
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Godwin EE, Kreutzer JS, Arango-Lasprilla JC, Lehan TJ. Marriage after brain injury: Review, analysis, and research recommendations. Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation 2011;26:43–55
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moore A, Stambrook M, Peters L, Lubusko A. Family coping and marital adjustment after traumatic brain injury. Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation 1991;6:83–89
   Google Scholar
• Peters LC, Stambrook M, Moore AD, Esses L. Psychosocial sequelae of closed head injury: Effects on the marital relationship. Brain Injury 1990;4:39–47
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Blais MC, Boisvert JM. Psychological and marital adjustment in couples following a traumatic brain injury (TBI): A critical review. Brain Injury 2005;19:1223–1235
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mauss-Clum N, Ryan M. Brain injury and the family. Journal of Neurosurgery Nurse 1981;13:165–169
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kreuter M, Dahllöf AG, Gudjonsson G, Sullivan M, Siösteen A. Sexual adjustment and its predictors after traumatic brain injury. Brain Injury 1998;12:349–368
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dahlberg C, Hawley L, Morey C, Newman J, Cusick C, Harrison-Felix C. Social communication skills in persons with post-acute traumatic brain injury: Three perspectives. Brain Injury 2006;20:425
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mathias JL, Wheaton P. Changes in attention and information-processing speed following severe traumatic brain injury: A meta-analytic review. Neuropsychology 2007;21:212–223
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kreutzer JS, Zasler ND. Psychosexual consequences of traumatic brain injury: Methodology and preliminary findings. Brain Injury 1989;3:177–186
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ponsford J. Sexual changes associated with traumatic brain injury. Neuropsychological Rehabilitation 2003;13:275–289
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walsh F. Normal family processes: Growing diversity and complexity. 3rd ed. New York, NY/London, England: The Guiliford Press; 2003
   Google Scholar
• Coyne JC, Rohrbaugh MJ, Shoham V, Sonnega JS, Nicklas JM, Cranford JA. Prognostic importance of marital quality for survival of congestive heart failure. American Journal of Cardiology 2001;88:526–529
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Assari S, Lankarani MM, Tavallaii SA. Revised dyadic adjustment scale as a reliable tool for assessment of quality of marital relationship in patients on long-term hemodialysis. Iranian Journal of Kidney Diseases 2009;3:242–245
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clipp EC, George LK. Patients with cancer and their spouse caregivers. Perceptions of the illness experience. Cancer 1992;69:1074–1079
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kiecolt-Glaser JK, Kennedy S, Malkoff S, Fisher L, Speicher C, Glaser R. Marital discord and immunity in males. Psychosomatic Medicine 1988;50:213–229
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Department of Health. The national service framework for long-term conditions. London: Department of Health; 2005
   Google Scholar
• Strauss A, Corbin J. Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques. 2nd ed. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications; 1990
   Google Scholar
• Corbin J, Strauss A. Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. 3rd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications; 2008
   Google Scholar
• Rossman GB, Rallis SF. Learning in the field: An introduction to qualitative research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications; 2003
   Google Scholar
• Glesne C, Peshkin A. Becoming qualitative researchers: An introduction. White Plains, NY: Longman; 1992
   Google Scholar
• Glaser BG. The constant comparitive method of qualitative analysis. Social Problems 1965;12:436–445
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glaser BG. Theoretical Sensitivity: Advances in the methodology of grounded theory. 1st ed. Mill Valley, CA: Socio Press; 1978
   Google Scholar
• Dye JF, Schatz IM, Rosenburg BA, Coleman ST. Constant comparison method: A kaleidoscope of data. The Qualitative Report 2000;4:1–9
   Google Scholar
• Kolb SM. Grounded theory and the constant comparitive method: Valid research and strategies for educators. Journal of Emerging Trends in Educational Research & Policy Studies 2012;1:83–86
   Google Scholar
• Glaser BG, Strauss AL. The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Hawthorne, NY: Aldine; 1967
   Google Scholar
• Bogdan RC, Biklen SK. Qualitative research for education: An introductory to theory and methods. 5th ed. Needham Heights, MA: Allyn and Bacon; 2006
   Google Scholar
• Taylor SJ, Bogdan RC. Introduction to qualitative research methods: A guidebook and resource. 3rd ed. New York, NY: Wiley; 1998
   Google Scholar
• Crabtree BF, Miller WL. Doing qualitative research. 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications; 1999
   Google Scholar
• Boss P. A clarification of the concept of psychological father presence in families experiencing ambiguity of boundary. Journal of Marriage & Family 1977;39:141–151
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boss P. Ambiguous loss: Learning to live with unresolved grief. 1st ed. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press; 2000
   Google Scholar
• Boss P. Ambiguous loss theory: Challenges for scholars and practitioners. Family Relations 2007;56:105–111
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kean S. The experience of ambiguous loss in families of brain injured ICU patients. Nursing in Critical Care 2010;15:66–75
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Landau J, Hissett J. Mild traumatic brain injury: Impact on identity and ambiguous loss in the family. Family, Systems & Health 2008;26:69
   Google Scholar
• Stets JE, Burke PJ. Identity theory and social identity theory. Social Psychology Quarterly 2000;63(3):224–237
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruddle JA, Coetzer BR, Vaughan FL. Grief after brain injury: A validation of the brain injury grief inventory (BIGI). Illness, Crisis & Loss 2005;13:235–247
   Google Scholar
• Carroll E, Coetzer R. Identity, grief and self-awareness after traumatic brain injury. Neuropsychological Rehabilitation 2011;21:289–305
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roundhill SJ, Williams WH, Hughes JM. The experience of loss following traumatic brain injury: Applying a bereavement model to the process of adjustment. Qualitative Research in Psychology 2007;4:241–257
   Google Scholar
• Marwit SJ, Kaye PN. Measuring grief in caregivers of persons with acquired brain injury. Brain Injury 2006;20:1419–1429
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown KLG. Grief as a basic conditioning factor affecting the self-care agency and self-care of family caregivers of persons with neurotrauma. Unpublished Dissertation. 1996. Available online at: http://digitalcommons.wayne.edu/dissertations/AAI9715816/, accessed September 28, 2013
   Google Scholar
• Hanks RA, Temkin N, Machamer J, Dikmen SS. Emotional and behavioral adjustment after traumatic brain injury. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 1999;80:991–997
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kreutzer JS, Gervasio AH, Camplair PS. Patient correlates of caregivers' distress and family functioning after traumatic brain injury. Brain Injury 1994;8:211–230
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Panayiotou A, Jackson M, Crowe SF. A meta-analytic review of the emotional symptoms associated with mild traumatic brain injury. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology 2010;32:463–473
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Segal D. Exploring the importance of identity following acquired brain injury: A review of the literature. International Journal of Child, Youth and Family Studies 2010;1:293–314
   Google Scholar
• Cloute K, Mitchell A, Yates P. Traumatic brain injury and the construction of identity: A discursive approach. Neuropsychological Rehabilitation 2008;18:651–670
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sabat A, Moodley L, Kathard H. Identity construction following traumatic brain injury: A case study. The South African Journal of Communication Disorders [Die Suid-Afrikaanse tydskrif vir Kommunikasieafwykings] 2006;53:17
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Vickery CD, Gontkovsky ST, Caroselli JS. Self-concept and quality of life following acquired brain injury: A pilot investigation. Brain Injury 2005;19:657–665
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nochi M. Reconstructing self-narratives in coping with traumatic brain injury. Social Science & Medicine 2000;51:1795–1804
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pinsof WM, Wynne LC. Toward progress research: Closing the gap between family therapy practice and research. Journal of Marriage and Family Therapy 2000;26:1–8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sexton TL, Alexander JF, Mease AL. Levels of evidence for the models and mechanisms of therapeutic change in family and couple therapy. In: Bergin and Garfield’s handbook of psychotherapy and behavior change. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.; 2004. p 590–646
   Google Scholar
• Sexton TL, Ridley CR, Kleiner AJ. Beyond common factors: Multilevel process models of therapeutic change in marriage and family therapy. Journal of Marriage and Family Therapy 2004;30:131–149
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yin R. The case study anthology. Volume 296. 1st ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications Inc.; 2004
   Google Scholar