Masking release, processing speed and listening effort in adults with traumatic brain injury

References

• Pichora-Fuller MK. Processing speed and timing in aging adults: Psychoacoustics, speech perception, and comprehension. International Journal of Audiology 2003;42:S59–S67
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caplan D, Waters G. The relationship between age, processing speed, working memory capacity, and language comprehension. Memory 2003;13:403–413
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gosselin PA, Gagne JP. Older adults expend more listening effort than young adults recognizing speech in noise. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research 2011;54:944–958
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giraud AL. Contributions of sensory input, auditory search and verbal comprehension to cortical activity during speech processing. Cerebral Cortex 2004;14:247–255
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tun P, Wingfield A, Stine E, Mecsas C. Rapid speech processing and divided attention: Processing rate versus processing resources as an explanation of age effects. Psychology and Aging 1992;7:546–550
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alsius A, Navarra J, Campbell R, Soto-Faraco S. Audiovisual integration of speech falters under high attention demands. Current Biology 2005;15:839–843
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Warren R, Obusek C, Ackroff J. Auditory induction: Perceptual synthesis of absent sounds. Science 1972;176:1149–1151
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gustafsson H, Arlinger S. Masking of speech by amplitude-modulated Noise. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 1994;95:518–529
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bacon S, Opie J, Montoya D. The effects of hearing loss and noise masking on the masking release for speech in temporally complex backgrounds. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research 1998;41:549–563
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duffy JR. Motor speech disorders. 3rd ed. St. Louis, MO: Elsevier; 2013
   Google Scholar
• Body R, Perkins M, McDonald S. Pragmatics, cognition, and communication in traumatic brain injury. In: McDonald S, Togher L, Code C, editors. Communication disorders following traumatic brain injury. East Sussex, UK: Psychology Press; 1999. p 81–112
   Google Scholar
• McDonald S, Pearce S. Clinical insights into pragmatic theory: Frontal lobe deficits and sarcasm. Brain and Language 1996;53:81–104
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Channon S, Watts M. Pragmatic language interpretation after closed head injury: Relationship to executive functioning. Cognitive Neuropsychiatry 2003;8:243–260
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Shamay-Tsoory SG, Tomer R, Aharon-Peretz J. The neuroanatomical basis of understanding sarcasm and its relationship to social cognition. Neuropsychology 2005;19:288–300
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Douglas JM. Relation of executive functioning to pragmatic outcome following severe traumatic brain injury. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research 2010;53:365--382
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Douglas JM, O'Flaherty CA, Snow PC. Measuring perception of communicative ability: The development and evaluation of the La Trobe Communication Questionnaire. Aphasiology 2000;14:251–268
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jury M, Flynn M. Auditory and vestibular sequelae to traumatic brain injury; a pilot study. The New Zealand Medical Journal 2001;114:286–288
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Musiek F, Baran J, Shinn J. Assessment and remediation of an auditory processing disorder associated with head trauma. Journal of the American Academy of Audiology 2004;15:117–132
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Oleksiak M, Smith BM, Saint Andre JRS, Saint Andre JR, Caughlan CM, Steiner M. Audiological issues and hearing loss among veterans with mild traumatic brain injury. The Journal of Rehabilitation Research and Development 2012;49:995--1004
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nelson PB, Jin S-H, Carney AE, Nelson DA. Understanding speech in modulated interference: Cochlear implant users and normal-hearing listeners. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 2003;113:961--968
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Veloso K, Hall J III, Grose J. Frequency selectivity and comodulation masking release in adults and in 6-year-old children. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research 1990;33:96–102
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Debruille CLMHMAX, Lorenzi C, Husson M, Ardoint M, Debruille X. Speech masking release in listeners with flat hearing loss: Effects of masker fluctuation rate on identification scores and phonetic feature reception. International Journal of Audiology 2006;45:487–495
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ziegler JC, Pech-Georgel C, George F, Lorenzi C. Noise on, voicing off: Speech perception deficits in children with specific language impairment. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology 2011;110:362–372
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Faul M, Xu L, Wald M, Coronado V. Traumatic brain injury in the United States: Emergency department visits, hospitalizations and deaths 2002-2006. Atlanta, GA: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Injury Prevention and Control; 2010. p 1–74
   Google Scholar
• Koelewijn T, Zekveld AA, Festen JM, Kramer SE. Pupil dilation uncovers extra listening effort in the presence of a single-talker masker. Ear and Hearing 2012;33:291–300
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sarampalis A, Kalluri S, Edwards B, Hafter E. Objective measures of listening effort: Effects of background noise and noise reduction. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research 2009;52:1230–1240
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Howells FM, Stein DJ, Russell VA. Perceived mental effort correlates with changes in tonic arousal during attentional tasks. Behavioral and Brain Functions 2010;6:1--15
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Azouvi P, Couillet J, Leclercq M, Martin Y, Asloun S, Rousseaux M. Divided attention and mental effort after severe traumatic brain injury. Neuropsychologia 2004;42:1260–1268
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nelson PB, Jin S-H. Factors affecting speech understanding in gated interference: Cochlear implant users and normal-hearing listeners. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 2004;115:2286--2294
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nicholas L, Brookshire R. Comprehension of spoken narrative discourse by adults with aphasia, right-hemisphere brain damage, or traumatic brain injury. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology 1995;4:69–81
   Google Scholar
• Madigan N, DeLuca J, Diamond B, Tramontano G, Averill A. Speed of information processing in traumatic brain injury: Modality-specific factors. Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation 2000;15:943–956
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murdoch BE, Kuruvilla MS, Goozée JV. Effect of speech rate manipulations on articulatory dynamics in severe traumatic brain injury: An EMA and EPG study. Brain Injury 2012;26:241–260
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oxenham AJ, Fligor BJ, Mason CR, Kidd G. Informational masking and musical training. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 2003;114:1543--1549
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schneider B, Li L, Daneman M. How competing speech interferes with speech comprehension in everyday listening situations. Journal of the American Academy of Audiology 2007;18:478–591
   Google Scholar
• Ponsford J, Kinsella G. Attentional deficits following closed-head injury. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology 1992;14:822–838
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ríos M, Periáñez JA, Muñoz-Céspedes JM. Attentional control and slowness of information processing after severe traumatic brain injury. Brain Injury 2004;18:257–272
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mathias J, Wheaton P. Changes in attention and information-processing speed following severe traumatic brain injury: A meta-analysis review. Neuropsychology 2007;21:212–223
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hinton-Bayre A, Geffen G, McFarland K. Mild head injury and speed of information processing: A prospective study of professional rugby league players. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology 1997;19:275–289
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campbell T, Dollaghan C. Speaking rate, articulatory speed, and linguistic processing in children and adolescents with severe traumatic brain injury. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research 1995;38:864–875
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lew H, Lee EH, Pan S, Date E. Electrophysiologic abnormalities of auditory and visual information processing in patients with traumatic brain injury. American Journal of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 2004;83:428–433
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kennedy M, Wozniak J, Muetzel R, Mueller B, Chiou H-H, Pantekoek K, Lim K. White matter and neurocognitive changes in adults with chronic traumatic brain injury. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society 2009;15:130--136
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kourtidou P, McCauley SR, Bigler ED, Traipe E, Wu TC, Chu ZD, Hunter JV, Li X, Levin HS, Wilde EA. Centrum semiovale and corpus callosum integrity in relation to information processing speed in patients with severe traumatic brain injury. Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation 2013;28:433–441
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kohl AD, Wylie GR, Genova HM, Hillary FG, DeLuca J. The neural correlates of cognitive fatigue in traumatic brain injury using functional MRI. Brain Injury 2009;23:420–432
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stewart-Scott A, Douglas J. Educational outcome for secondary and postsecondary students following traumatic brain injury. Brain Injury 1998;12:317–331
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kennedy M, Krause M, Turkstra L. An electronic survey about college experiences after traumatic brain injury. NeuroRehabilitation 2008;23:511–520
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kennedy MR, Krause MO. Self-regulated learning in a dynamic coaching model for supporting college students with traumatic brain injury. Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation 2011;26:212–223
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clark H, Robin D. Sense of effort during a lexical decision task: Resource allocation deficits following brain damage. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology 1995;4:143–147
   Google Scholar
• Tun PA, Williams AV, Small BJ, Hafter ER. The effects of aging on auditory processing and cognition. American Journal of Audiology 2012;21:344–350
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fitzgerald D. Head trauma: Hearing loss and dizziness. Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery 1996;40:488–496
   Google Scholar
• Levine B, Cabeza R, McIntosh A, Black S, Grady C, Stuss D. Functional reorganisation of memory after traumatic brain injury: A study with H2 15O positron emission tomography. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery, & Psychiatry 2002;73:173–181
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hicks C, Tharpe A. Listening effort and fatigue in school-age children with and without hearing loss. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research 2002;45:573–584
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rakerd B, Seitz PF, Whearty M. Assessing the cognitive demands of speech listening for people with hearing losses. Ear and Hearing 1996;17:97–106
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Larsby B, Hällgren M, Lyxell B, Arlinger S. Cognitive performance and perceived effort in speech processing tasks: Effects of different noise backgrounds in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired subjects [Desempeño cognitivo y percepción del esfuerzo en tareas de procesamiento del lenguaje: Efectos de las diferentes condiciones de fondo en sujetos normales e hipoacúsicos]. International Journal of Audiology 2005;44:131–143
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rajan R, Cainer KE. Ageing without hearing loss or cognitive impairment causes a decrease in speech intelligibility only in informational maskers. Neuroscience 2008;154:784–795
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Desjardins JL. Age-related changes in listening effort for various types of masker noises. Dissertation - Syracuse University: 2011; p 1–101
   Google Scholar
• Knight R, Titov N, Crawford M. The effects of distraction on prospective remembering following traumatic brain injury assessed in a simulated naturalistic environment. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society 2006;12:8–16
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lezak MD. Neuropsychological assessment. 3rd ed. New York: Oxford University Press; 1995
   Google Scholar
• Nelson HE. The National Adult Reading Test. Windsor, England: NFER-Nelson; 1982
   Google Scholar
• IEEE. IEEE recommnded pratice for speech quality measurements. IEEE Transactions on Audio and Electroacoustics
   Google Scholar
• Weschler D. WMS-III: Wechsler Memory Scale Administration and Scoring Manual. San Antonio, TX: Psychological Corporation; 1997
   Google Scholar
• Tombaugh T, Kozak J, Rees L. Normative data stratified by age and education for two measures of verbal fluency: FAS and animal naming. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology 1999;14:167–177
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Delis DC, Kramer JH, Kaplan E, Ober BA. California Verbal Learning Test. 2nd ed. San Antonio, TX: Psychological Corporation; 2000
   Google Scholar
• Ardila A, Pineda D. Correlation between intelligence test scores and executive function measures. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology 2000;15:31–36
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robertson I, Ward T, Ridgeway V, Nimmo-Smith I. The Test of Everyday Attention. Bury St. Edmunds, UK: Thames Valley West Company; 1994
   Google Scholar
• Woodcock R, McGrew K, Mather N. Woodcock-Johnson III Test of Cognitive Abilities. Itasca, IL: Riverside; 2001
   Google Scholar
• Girden E. ANOVA: Repeated measures. Newbury Park, CA: Sage; 1992
   Google Scholar
• Spikman JM, Zomeren AHV, Deelman BG. Deficits of attention after closed-head injury: Slowness only? Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology 1996;18:755–767
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cicerone K. Attention deficits and dual task demands after mild traumatic brain injury. Brain Injury 1996;10:79–89
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perlstein WM, Cole MA, Demery JA, Seignourel PJ, Dixit NK, Larson MJ, Briggs RW. Parametric manipulation of working memory load in traumatic brain injury: Behavioral and neural correlates. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society 2004;10:724–741
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vakil E. The effect of moderate to severe Traumatic Brain Injury (TBI) on different aspects of memory: A selective review. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology [Internet] 2005;27:977–1021
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Veltman J, Brouwer W, van Zomeren A, van Wolffelaar P. Central executive aspects of attention in subacute severe and very severe closed head injury patients: Planning, inhibition, flexibility, and divided attention. Neuropsychology 1996;10:357–367
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keil K, Kaszniak AW. Examining executive function in individuals with brain injury: A review. Aphasiology 2002;16:305–335
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Renner C, Hummelsheim H, Kopczak A, Steube D, Schneider H, Schneider M, Kreitschmann-Andermahr I, Jordan M, Uhl E, Stalla G. The influence of gender on the injury severity, course and outcome of traumatic brain injury. Brain Injury 2012;26:1360–1371
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neff D, Kessler C, Dethlefs T. Sex differences in simultaneous masking with random-frequency maskers. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 1996;10:2547–2550
   Google Scholar
• McFadden D. Sex differences in the auditory system. Developmental Neuropsychology 1998;14:261–298
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Noppeney U, Price C. An fMRI study of syntactic adaptation. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 2004;16:702–713
   Google Scholar
• Jansma JM, Ramsey NF, de Zwart JA, van Gelderen P, Duyn JH. fMRI study of effort and information processing in a working memory task. Human Brain Mapping 2007;28:431–440
   PubMedGoogle Scholar