Primary caregivers' psychological status and family functioning after traumatic brain injury

References

• Brooks N. Head injury and the family. Closed Head Injury: Psychological, Social, and Family Consequences, N. Brooks. Oxford University Press, Oxford 1984; 123–147
   Google Scholar
• Kozloff R. Networks of social support and the outcome from severe head injury. Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation 1987; 2: 14–23
   Google Scholar
• Camplair P. S., Kreutzer J. S., Doherty K. R. Family outcome following adult traumatic brain injury: a review of the literature. Community Integration Following Traumatic Brain Injury, J. S. Kreutzer, P. Wehman. Paul H. Brookes, Baltimore, MD 1990; 207–223
   Google Scholar
• Prigatano G. P. Personality and psychosocial consequences of brain injury. Neuropsychological Rehabilitation after Brain Injury, G. P. Prigatano, D. J. Fordyce, H. K. Zeener, et al. Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, MD 1986; 29–50
   Google Scholar
• Oddy M., Humphrey M., Utley D. Stresses upon the relatives of head injured patients. British Journal of Psychiatry 1978; 133: 507–513
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosenbaum M., Najenson T. Changes in life patterns and symptoms of low mood as reported by wives of severely brain injured soldiers. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology 1976; 44: 881–888
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jacobs H. E. Los Angeles head injury survey: procedure and initial findings. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 1988; 69: 425–431
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Depompei R., Zarski J. J. Assessment of the family. Head Injury: A Family Matter, J. M. Williams, T. Kay. Paul H. Brookes, Baltimore, MD 1991; 101–120
   Google Scholar
• Kreutzer J. S., Marwitz J. H., Kepler K. Traumatic brain injury: Family response and outcome. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 1992; 73: 771–778
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McKlnlay W. W., Pentland B. Editorial: Developing rehabilitation services for the head injured: A UK perspective. Brain Injury 1987; 1: 3–4
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Brooks N. D., Campsie L., McKinlay W. W. The five year outcome of severe blunt head injury: a relative's view. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery, and Psychiatry 1986; 49: 764–770
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brooks N., Campsie L., Symington C., et al. The effects of head injury on patient and relative within seven years of injury. Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation 1987; 2(3)1–13
   Google Scholar
• Livingston M. G., Brooks N. D. N., Bond M. R. Patient outcome in the year following severe head injury and relatives' psychiatric and social functioning. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery, and Psychiatry 1985; 48: 876–881
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oddy M. Head injury and social adjustment. Closed Head Injury: Psychological, Social, and Family Consequences, N. Brooks. Oxford University Press, Oxford 1984; 108–123
   Google Scholar
• Weddell R., Oddy M., Jenkins D. Social adjustment after rehabilitation: a two year follow-up of patients with severe head injury. Psychological Medicine 1980; 10: 257–263
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brooks N., McKinlay W. W. Personality and behavioral changes after severe blunt head injury: a relative's view. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery and Psychiatry 1983; 46: 336–344
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Panting A., Merry P. H. The long term rehabilitation of severe head injuries with particular reference to the need for social and medical support for the patient's family. Rehabilitation 1972; 38: 33–37
   Google Scholar
• Thomsen I. V. The patient with severe head injury and his family. Scandinavian Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine 1974; 6: 180–183
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Thomsen I. V. Late outcome of very severe blunt head trauma: a 10–15 year second follow-up. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery, and Psychiatry 1984; 47: 260–268
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Litmnan T. J. The family as basic unit in health and medical care: a social behavioral overview. Social Science and Medicine 1974; 8: 495–519
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Horowitz A. Family caregiving to the frail elderly. Annual Review of Gerontology and Geriatrics, C. Eisdorfer, 1985; 5
   Google Scholar
• Lezak M. Brain damage is a family affair. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology 1988; 10: 111–123
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mauss-Clum N., Ryan M. Brain injury and the family. Journal of Neurosurgical Nursing 1981; 13: 165–169
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Livingston M. G., Brooks D. N., Bond M. R. Three months after severe head injury: Psychiatric and social impact on relatives. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery, and Psychiatry 1985; 48: 870–875
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levin H. S., Benton A. L., Grossman R. G. Neurobehavioral Consequences of Closed Head Injury. Oxford University Press, New York 1982
   Google Scholar
• Derogatis L. R. Brief Symptom Inventory. Clinical Psychometric Research, Baltimore 1975
   Google Scholar
• Epstein N. B., Baldwin L. M., Bishop D. S. The McMaster Family Assessment Device. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy 1983; 9: 171–180
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Derogatis L. R., Melisaratos N. The Brief Symptom Inventory: an introductory report. Psychological Medicine 1983; 13: 595–605
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Epstein N. B., Bishop D. S., Levin S. The McMaster Model of Family Functioning. Journal of Marriage and Family Counseling 1978; 4: 19–31
   Google Scholar
• Miller I. W., Epstein N. B., Bishop D. S., Keitner G. I. The McMaster Family Assessment Device: Reliability and validity. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy 1985; 11: 345–356
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kabacoff R. I., Miller I. W., Bishop D. S., Epstein N. B., Keitner G. I. A psychometric study of the McMaster Family Assessment Device in psychiatric, medical and nonclinical samples. Journal of Family Psychology 1990; 3: 431–439
   Google Scholar
• Zarski J., DePompei R., Zook A. Traumatic head injury: dimensions of family rcsponsivity. Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation 1988; 3(4)31–41
   Google Scholar
• Gatz M., Bengston V. L., Blum M. J. Caregiving families. Handbook of the Psychology of Aging, 3rd edn, J. E. Birren, K. W. Schaic. Academic Press, San Diego 1990; 404–426
   Google Scholar
• Lezak M. Living with the characterologically altered brain injured patient. Journal of Clinical Psychiatry 1978; 39B: 592–598
   Google Scholar
• Rimel R. W., Glordani B., Barth J. T., et al. Moderate head injury: completing the clinical spectrum of brain trauma. Neurosurgery 1982; 11(3)344–351
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kreutzer J. S., Doherty K. R., Harris J. A., Zasler N. D. Alcohol use among persons with traumatic brain injury. Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation 1990; 5: 9–20
   Google Scholar
• Kreutzer J. S., Wehman P., Harris J. A., et al. Substance abuse and crime patterns among persons with traumatic brain injury referred for supportive employment. Brain Injury 1991; 5(2)177–187
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Klonoff H. Head injuries in children: Predisposing factors, accident conditions, accident proncness and sequelae. American Journal of Public Health 1971; 61: 2405–2411
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rutter M., Chadwick O., Shaffer D., et al. A prospective study of children with head injuries: I. Design and methods. Psychological Medicine 1980; 10: 633–645
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buchanan K. The impact of brain injury on the family: parents vs. partners. Presented at conference. Cognitive Rehabilitation/Community Integration through Scientifically Based Practice–After Brain Injury, Richmond, VA, 25 September, 1992
   Google Scholar