Compound nouns in spoken language production by speakers with aphasia compared to neurologically healthy speakers: An exploratory study

References

• Askedal, J. O. (2005). The standard languages and their systems in the 20th century III: Norwegian. In O. Bandle, K. Braunmüller, E. H. Jahr, A. Karker, H.-P. Naumann, & U. Teleman ( Eds.), The Nordic languages: An international handbook of the history of the North Germanic languages ( Vol. 2, pp. 1584–1602). Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.
   Google Scholar
• Badecker, W. (2001). Lexical composition and the production of compounds: Evidence from errors in naming. Language and Cognitive Processes, 16, 337–366.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Badecker, W. (2007). Processing compound words: An introduction to the issues. Brain and Language, 103, 16–17.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barde, L. H. F., Schwartz, M. F., & Boronat, C. B. (2006). Semantic weight and verb retrieval in aphasia. Brain and Language, 97, 266–278.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bauer, L. (2001). Morphological productivity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bauer, L. (2009). Typology of compounds. In R. Lieber & P. Štekauer ( Eds.), The Oxford handbook of compounding ( pp. 343–356). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Beeke, S., Wilkinson, R., & Maxim, J. (2003). Exploring aphasic grammar 2: Do language testing and conversation tell a similar story? Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics, 17, 109–134.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bertram, R., & Hyönä, J. (2003). The length of a complex word modifies the role of morphological structure: Evidence from eye movements when reading short and long Finnish compounds. Journal of Memory and Language, 48, 615–634.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bi, Y., Han, Z., & Shu, H. (2007). Compound frequency effect in word production: Evidence from anomia. Brain and Language, 103, 55–56.
   Google Scholar
• Blanken, G. (2000). The production of nominal compounds in aphasia. Brain and Language, 74, 84–102.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Breedin, S. D., Saffran, E. M., & Schwartz, M. F. (1998). Semantic factors in verb retrieval: An effect of complexity. Brain and Language, 63, 1–31.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Butt, M. (2010). The light verb jungle: Still hacking away. In B. Amber, B. Baker, & M. Harvey ( Eds.), Complex predicates. Cross-linguistic perspectives on event structure ( pp. 48–78). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bybee, J. (1995). Regular morphology and the lexicon. Language and Cognitive Processes, 10, 425–455.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bybee, J. (2007). Frequency of use and the organization of language. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Delazer, M., & Semenza, C. (1998). The processing of compound words: A study in aphasia. Brain and Language, 61, 54–62.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Downing, P. (1977). On the creation and use of English compound nouns. Language, 53, 810–842.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dressler, W. U. (2006). Compound types. In G. Libben & G. Jarema ( Eds.), The representation and processing of compound words ( pp. 23–44). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Druks, J. (2002). Verbs and nouns – a review of the literature. Journal of Neurolinguistics, 15, 289–315.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edwards, S. (2005). Fluent aphasia. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fiorentino, R., & Poeppel, D. (2007). Compound words and structure in the lexicon. Language and Cognitive Processes, 22, 953–1000.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gagné, C. L. (2000). Relation-based combinations versus property-based combinations: A test of the CARIN theory and the dual-process theory of conceptual combination. Journal of Memory and Language, 42, 365–389.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gagné, C. L. (2001). Relation and lexical priming during the interpretation of noun-noun combinations. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 27, 236–254.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gagné, C. L. (2002). Lexical and relational influences on the processing of novel compounds. Brain and Language, 81, 723–735.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gagné, C. L. (2009). Psycholinguistic perspectives. In R. Lieber & P. Štekauer ( Eds.), The Oxford handbook of compounding ( pp. 255–271). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gagné, C. L., & Shoben, E. J. (1997). Influence of thematic relations on the comprehension of modifier-noun combinations. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 23, 71–87.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gagné, C. L., & Spalding, T. L. (2006). Conceptual combination: Implications for the mental lexicon. In G. Libben & G. Jarema ( Eds.), The representation and processing of compound words ( pp. 145–168). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gagné, C. L., & Spalding, T. L. (2009). Constituent integration during the processing of compound words: Does it involve the use of relational structures? Journal of Memory and Language, 60, 20–35.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodglass, H., & Kaplan, E. (1972). The assessment of aphasia and related disorders. Philadelphia, PA: Lea & Febiger.
   Google Scholar
• Gordon, J. K. (2008). Measuring the lexical semantics of picture description in aphasia. Aphasiology, 22, 839–852.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gordon, J. K., & Dell, G. S. (2003). Learning to divide the labor: An account of deficits in light and heavy verb production. Cognitive Sciences, 27, 1–40.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guevara, E. (2010). NoWaC: A large web-based corpus for Norwegian. In Proceedings of the NAACL HLT 2010 6th web as corpus workshop, Los Angeles, California, June 2010 ( pp. 1–7). Association for Computational Linguistics. Accessed 8 February 2010, from: http://www.tekstlab.uio.no/nowac/
   Google Scholar
• Heyvaert, L. (2009). Compounding in cognitive linguistics. In R. Lieber & P. Štekauer ( Eds.), The Oxford handbook of compounding ( pp. 233–254). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hittmair-Delazer, M., Andree, B., Semenza, C., De Bleser, R., & Benke, T. (1994). Naming by German compounds. Journal of Neurolinguistics, 8, 27–41.
   Google Scholar
• Jacobson, R. (1956). Two aspects of language and two types of aphasic disturbances. In R. Jacobson & M. Halle ( Eds.), Fundamentals of language ( pp. 55–82). The Hague: Mouton.
   Google Scholar
• Janssen, N., Bi, Y., & Caramazza, A. (2008). A tale of two frequencies: Determining the speech of lexical access for Mandarin Chinese and English compounds. Language and Cognitive Processes, 23, 1191–1223.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jarema, G., Perlak, D., & Semenza, C. (2010). The processing of compounds in bilingual aphasia: A multiple-case study. Aphasiology, 24, 126–140.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kirmess, M., & Lind, M. (forthcoming). Spoken language production as outcome measurement following constraint induced language therapy. Aphasiology.
   Google Scholar
• Korpijaakko-Huuhka, A.-M. (2008). Text production of Finnish speakers with aphasia. In A. Klippi & K. Launonen ( Eds.), Research in logopedics. Speech and language therapy in Finland ( pp. 99–124). Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
   Google Scholar
• Krott, A., Gagné, C. L., & Nicoladis, E. (2009). How the parts relate to the whole: Frequency effects on children’s interpretations of novel compounds. Journal of Child Language, 36, 85–112.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krott, A., Gagné, C. L., & Nicoladis, E. (2010). Children’s preference for HAS and LOCATED relations: A word learning bias for noun-noun compounds. Journal of Child Language, 37, 373–394.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laine, M., & Martin, N. (2006). Anomia. Theoretical and clinical aspects. Hove: Psychology Press.
   Google Scholar
• Levi, J. N. (1978). The syntax and semantics of complex nominals. New York, NY: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Libben, G. (1998). Semantic transparency in the processing of compounds: Consequences for representation, processing and impairment. Brain and Language, 61, 30–44.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Libben, G. (2005). Everything is psycholinguistics: Material and methodological considerations in the study of compound processing. The Canadian Journal of Linguistics, 50, 267–283.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Libben, G. (2006). Why study compound processing? An overview of the issues. In G. Libben & G. Jarema ( Eds.), The representation and processing of compound words ( pp. 1–22). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Libben, G., & Jarema, G. (2004). Conceptions and questions concerning morphological processing. Brain and Language, 90, 2–8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lind, M., Kristoffersen, K. E., Moen, I., & Simonsen, H. G. (2009). Semi-spontaneous oral text production: Measurements in clinical practice. Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics, 23, 872–886.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matthews, P. H. (1991). Morphology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Menn L., & Obler, L. K. (Eds.). (1990). Agrammatic aphasia. A cross-language narrative sourcebook. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Menn, L., O’Connor, M., Obler, L. K., & Holland, A. (1995). Non-fluent aphasia in a multilingual world. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Meyer, A. S., & Belke, E. (2007). Word form retrieval in language production. In M. G. Gaskell (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of psycholinguistics ( pp. 471–487). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pavlenko, A. (2011). (Re-)naming the world: Word-to-referent mapping in second language speakers. In A. Pavlenko (Ed.), Thinking and speaking in two languages ( pp. 198–236). Bristol: Multilingual Matters.
   Google Scholar
• Pollatsek, A., & Hyönä, J. (2005). The role of semantic transparency in the processing of Finnish compound words. Language and Cognitive Processes, 20, 261–290.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prins, R., & Bastiaanse, R. (2004). Review: Analysing the spontaneous speech of aphasic speakers. Aphasiology, 18, 1075–1091.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reinvang, I., & Engvik, H. (1980). Norsk grunntest for afasi: Håndbok. Oslo: Universitetsforlaget.
   Google Scholar
• Rochford, G., & Williams, M. (1965). Studies in the development and breakdown in the use of names. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery and Psychiatry, 28, 407–413.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scalise, S., & Vogel, I. (2010). Why compounding. In S. Scalise & I. Vogel ( Eds.), Cross-disciplinary issues in compounding ( pp. 1–21). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Semenza, C., Luzzatti, C., & Carabelli, S. (1997). Morphological representation of compound nouns: A study on Italian aphasic patients. Journal of Neurolinguistics, 10, 33–43.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Semenza, C., & Mondini, S. (2006). The neuropsychology of compound words. In G. Libben & G. Jarema ( Eds.), The representation and processing of compound words ( pp. 71–95). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Shoben, E. J. (1991). Predicating and non-predicating combinations. In P. J. Schwanenflugal (Ed.), The psychology of word meanings ( pp. 117–135). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Simonsen, H. G., & Lind, M. (2002). Past tense expression in a Norwegian man with Broca’s aphasia. In F. Windsor, M. L. Kelly, & N. Hewlett ( Eds.), Investigations in clinical phonetics and linguistics ( pp. 45–56). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Wray, A. (2002). Formulaic language and the lexicon. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar