The use of semantic- and phonological-based feature approaches to treat naming deficits in aphasia

References

• Abel, S., Willmes, K., & Huber, W. (2007). Model-oriented naming therapy: Testing predictions of a connectionist model. Aphasiology, 21, 411–447. doi: 10.1080/02687030701192687.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alario, F. X., Segui, J., & Ferrand, L. (2000). Semantic and associative priming in picture naming. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Experimental Psychology, 53A, 741–764.
   Google Scholar
• Annoni, J. M., Khateb, A., Custodi, M. C., Debeauvais, V., Michel, C. M., & Landsi, T. (1998). Advantage of semantic language therapy in chronic aphasia: A study of three cases. Aphasiology, 12, 1093–1105.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barlow, D. H., & Hayes, S. C. (1979). Alternating treatments design: One strategy for comparing the effects of two treatments in a single subject. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 12, 199–210.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barlow, D. H., & Hersen, M. (1984). Single case experimental designs: Strategies for studying behavior change. New York, NY: Pergamon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Beeson, P. M., & Robey, R. R. (2006). Evaluating single-subject treatment research: Lessons learned from the aphasia literature. Neuropsychological Review, 16, 161–169. doi: 10.1007/s11065-006-09013-7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Best, W., Herbert, R., Hickin, J., Osborne, F., & Howard, D. (2002). Phonological and orthographic facilitation of word-retrieval in aphasia: Immediate and delayed effects. Aphasiology, 16, 151–168. doi: 10.1080/02687040143000483.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boyle, M. (2004). Semantic feature analysis treatment for anomia in two fluent aphasia syndromes. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 13, 236–249. doi:10.1044/1058-0360(2004/025).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boyle, M. (2010). Semantic feature analysis treatment for aphasic word retrieval impairments: What's in a name? Topics in Stroke Rehabilitation, 17, 411–422. doi: 10.1310/tsr1706-411.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boyle, M., & Coelho, C. A. (1995). Application of semantic feature analysis using a treatment for aphasic dysnomia. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 4, 94–98.
   Google Scholar
• Busk, P. L., & Serlin, R. (1992). Meta-analysis for single case research. In T. R. Kratochwill & Levin J. R. (Eds.), Single-case research design and analysis: New directions for psychology and education (pp. 187–212). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Caramazza, A., & Hillis. A. E. (1990). Where do semantic errors come from? Cortex, 26, 95–122.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coelho, C. A., McHugh, R. E., & Boyle, M. (2000). Semantic feature analysis as a treatment for aphasic dysnomia: A replication. Aphasiology, 14, 133–142.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Collins, A. M., & Loftus, E. F. (1975). A spreading activation theory of semantic processing. Psychological Review, 52, 407–428.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Conley, A., & Coelho, C. A. (2003). Treatment of word retrieval impairment in chronic Broca's aphasia. Aphasiology, 17, 203–211.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Costa, A., Alario, F.-X., & Caramazza, A. (2005). On the categorical nature of the semantic interference effect in the picture-word interference paradigm. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 12, 125–131. doi: 10.3758/BF03196357.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cree, G. S., McNorgan, C., & McRae, K. (2006). Distinctive features hold a privileged status in the computation of word meaning: Implications for theories of semantic memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 32, 643–658. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.32.4.643.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dell, G. S. (1986). A spreading-activation theory of retrieval in sentence production. Psychological Review, 93, 283–321. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.93.3.283.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dell, G. S., & O'Seaghdha, P. G. (1992). Stages of lexical access in language production. Cognition, 42, 287–314. doi:10.1016/0010-0277(92)90046-K.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dell, G. S., Schwartz, M. F., Martin, N., & Saffran, E. M. (1997). Lexical access in aphasic and nonaphasic speakers. Psychological Review, 104, 801–838. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.104.4.801.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duffy, J. R. (2005). Motor speech disorders: Substrates, differential diagnosis, and management. St, MO: Elsevier Mosby.
   Google Scholar
• Foygel, D., & Dell, G. S. (2000). Models of impaired lexical access in speech production. Journal of Memory and Language, 43, 182–216. doi:10.1006/jmla.2000.2716.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Franklin, S., Howard, D., & Peterson, K. (1995). Abstract word anomia. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 12, 549–566. doi: 10.1080/02643299508252007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gagnon, D. A., Schwartz, M. F., Martin, N., Dell, G. S., & Saffran, E. M. (1997). The origins of form-related paraphasias in aphasic naming. Brain and Language, 59, 450–472. doi: 10.1006/brln.1997.1792.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garrard, P., Lambon Ralph, M. A., Hodges, J. R., & Patterson, K. (2001). Prototypicality, distinctiveness, and intercorrelation: Analyses of the semantic attributes of living and nonliving concepts. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 18, 125–174.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldrick, M., & Rapp, B. (2002). The restricted interaction account (RIA) of spoken word production: The best of both worlds. Aphasiology, 16, 20–55. doi: 10.1080/02687040143000203.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldrick, M., & Rapp, B. (2007). Lexical and post-lexical phonological representations in spoken production. Cognition, 102, 219–260. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2005.12.010.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greenwald, M. L., Raymer, A. M., Richardson, M. E., & Rothi, L. J. G. (1995). Contrasting treatments for severe impairments of picture naming. Neuropsychological Rehabilitation, 5, 17–49. doi: 10.1080/09602019508520174.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hashimoto, N., & Fromme, A. (2011). The use of a modified semantic features analysis approach in aphasia. Journal of Communication Disorders, 44, 459–469. doi:10.1016/j.jcomdis.2011.02.004.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hickin, J., Best, W., Herbert, R., Howard, D., & Osborne, F. (2002). Phonological therapy for word-finding difficulties: A re-evaluation. Aphasiology, 16, 981–989. doi: 10.1080/02687030244000509.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hillis, A. E., & Caramazza, A. (1994). Theories of lexical processing in the rehabilitation of lexical deficits. In M. J. Riddoch & G. W. Humphreys (Eds.), Cognitive neuropsychology and cognitive rehabilitation (pp. 449–484). Hove: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Hillis, A.E., & Caramazza, A. (1995). The compositionality of lexical semantic representations: Clues from semantic errors in object naming. Memory, 3, 333–358.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hillis, A.E., Rapp, B., Romani, C., & Caramazza, A. (1990). Selective impairment of semantics in lexical processing. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 7, 191–243. doi: 10.1080/02643299008253442.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Howard, D. (2000). Cognitive neuropsychology and aphasia therapy: The case of word retrieval. In I. Papathanasiou (Ed.), Acquired neurogenic communication disorders: A clinical perspective (pp. 76–99). London: Whurr.
   Google Scholar
• Howard, D., & Gatehouse, C. (2006). Distinguishing semantic and lexical word retrieval deficits in people with aphasia. Aphasiology, 20, 921–950. doi: 10.1080/02687030600782679.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Howard, D., & Nickels, L. (2005). Separating input and output phonology: Semantic, phonological, an orthographic effects in short-term memory impairment. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 22, 42–77. 10.1080/02643290342000582.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Howard, D., & Patterson, K. (1992). The Pyramids and Palm Trees Test. Suffolk: Thames Valley Test Company.
   Google Scholar
• Howard, D., Patterson, K. E., Franklin, S., Orchard-Lisle, V., & Morton, J. (1985). The facilitation of picture naming in aphasia. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 2, 49–80. doi: 10.1080/02643298508252861.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaplan, E., Goodglass, H., & Weintraub, S. (2001). Boston Naming test: Second edition. Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Kay, J., & Ellis, A. (1987). A cognitive neuropsychological case study of anomia. Brain, 110, 613–629.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kay, J., Lesser, R., & Coltheart, M. (1992). Psycholinguistic assessment of language processes in aphasia (PALPA). East Sussex: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Kazdin, A. E. (1982). Single-case research designs – methods for clinical and applied settings. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kelly, H., Brady, M., & Enderby, P. (2010). Speech and language therapy for aphasia following stroke. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 5, CD000425. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD000425.pub2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kertesz, A. (1982). Western Aphasia Battery. London: University of Western Ontario Press.
   Google Scholar
• Knott, R., Patterson, K., & Hodges, J. R. (2000). The role of speech production in auditory-verbal short-term memory: Evidence from progressive fluent aphasia. Neuropsychologia, 38, 125–142. doi:10.1016/S0028-3932(99)00069-X.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• La Heij, W., Dirkx, J., & Kramer, P. (1990). Categorical interference and associative priming in picture naming. British Journal of Psychology, 81, 511–525.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leonard, C., Rochon, E., & Laird, L. (2008). Treating naming impairments in aphasia: Findings from a phonological components analysis treatment. Aphasiology, 22, 923–947. doi: 10.1080/02687030701831474.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levelt, W. J. M. (1999). Models of word production. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 3, 223–232.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levelt, W .J. M., Roelofs, A., & Meyer, A. S. (1999). A theory of lexical access in speech production. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 22, 1–38.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lorenz, A., & Ziegler, W. (2009). Semantic vs. word-form specific techniques in anomia treatment: A multiple single-case study. Journal of Neurolinguistics, 22, 515–537. doi:10.1016/j.jneuroling.2009.05.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lowell, S., Beeson, P., & Holland, A. (1995). The efficacy of a semantic cueing procedure on naming performance of adults with aphasia. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 4, 109–114.
   Google Scholar
• Lupker, S. J. (1979). The semantic nature of response competition in the picture-word interference task. Memory and Cognition, 7, 485–495. doi: 10.3758/BF03198265.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin, N. (2009). The roles of semantic and phonological processing in short-term memory and learning: Evidence from aphasia. In A. Thorn & M. Page (Eds.), Interactions between short-term and long-term memory in the verbal domain (pp. 220–243). New York, NY: Psychology Press.
   Google Scholar
• Martin, N., & Saffran, E. M. (1997). Language and auditory-verbal short-term memory impairments: Evidence for common underlying processes. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 14, 641–682. doi: 10.1080/026432997381402.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McRae, K., Cree, G. S., Seidenberg, M. S., & McNorgan, C. (2005). Semantic feature production norms for a large set of living and nonliving things. Behavioral Research Methods, Instruments, and Computers, 37, 547–559.
   Google Scholar
• Morgan, D. L., & Morgan, R. K. (2008). Comparing treatments: The alternating treatments design. In D. L. Morgan & R. K. Morgan (Eds.), Single-case research methods for the behavioral and health sciences (pp. 183–204). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Nadeau, S. E. (2000). Phonology. In S.E. Nadeau, L.J. Gonzalez Rothi, & B. Crosson (Eds.), Aphasia and language: Theory to practice (pp. 40–107). New York, NY: The Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nelson, D. L., McEvoy, C. L., & Schreiber, T. A. (1998). The University of South Florida word association, rhyme, and word fragment norms. Retrieved from http://www.usf.edu/FreeAssociation/
   Google Scholar
• Nickels, L. (2002). Therapy for naming disorders: Revisiting, revising, and reviewing. Aphasiology, 16, 935–979.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rapp, B., & Goldrick, M. (2000). Discreteness and interactivity in spoken word production. Psychological Review, 107, 460–499.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raymer, A. M., Thompson, C. K., Jacobs, B., & LeGrand, H. R. (1993). Phonological treatment of naming deficits in aphasia: Model-based generalization analysis. Aphasiology, 7, 27–53. doi: 10.1080/02687039308249498.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rider, J. D., Wright, H. H., Marshall, R. C., & Page, J. L. (2008). Using semantic feature analysis to improve contextual discourse in adults with aphasia. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 16, 161–172. doi:10.1044/1058-0360(2008/016).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sailor, K., Brooks, P. J., Bruening, P. R., Seiger-Gardner, L., & Guterman, M. (2009). Exploring the time course of semantic interference and associative priming in the picture-word interference task. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 62, 789–801. doi: 10.1080/17470210802254383.
   Google Scholar
• Schwartz, M. F., Dell, G. S., Martin, N., Gabl, S., & Sobel, P. (2006). A case-series of test of the interactive two-step model of lexical access: Evidence from picture naming. Journal of Memory and Language, 54, 228–264. doi:10.1016/j.jml.2005.10.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Snodgrass, J. G., & Vanderwart, M. (1980). A standardized set of 260 pictures: Norms for name agreement, image agreement, familiarity, and visual complexity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 6, 174–215. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.6.2.174.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Tree, J. J., & Hirsch, K. W. (2003). Sometimes faster, sometimes slower: Associative and competitor priming in picture naming with young and elderly participants. Journal of Neurolinguistics, 16, 489–514. doi: 10.1016/S0911-6044(02)00005-2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wambaugh, J. L. (2003). A comparison of the relative effects of phonologic and semantic cueing treatments. Aphasiology, 17, 433–441.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wambaugh, J., Linebaugh, C., Doyle, P., Martinez, Z., Kalinyak-Fliszar, M., & Spencer, K. (2001). Effects of two cueing treatments on lexical retrieval in aphasic speakers with different levels of deficit. Aphasiology, 15, 933–950. doi: 10.1080/02687040143000302.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilshire, C. E. (2002). Where do aphasic phonological errors come from? Evidence from phoneme movement errors in picture naming. Aphasiology, 16, 169–197. doi: 10.1080/02687040143000528.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilshire, C. E., & Coslett, H. B. (2000). Disorders of word retrieval in aphasia: Theories and potential applications. In S. E. Nadeau, L. J. Gonzalez-Rothi, & B. Crosson (Eds.), Aphasia and language: Theory to practice (pp. 82–107). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wilshire, C. E., & McCarthy, R. A. (1996). Experimental investigations of an impairment in phonological encoding. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 13, 1059–1098.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar