Past tense –ed omissions by children with specific language impairment: The role of sonority and phonotactics

References

• Baayen, R. H., Davidson, D. J., & Bates, D. M. (2008). Mixed-effects modeling with crossed random effects for subjects and items. Journal of Memory and Language, 59, 390–412
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barr, D. J., Levy, R., Scheepers, C., & Tily, H. J. (2013). Random effects structure for confirmatory hypothesis testing: Keep it maximal. Journal of Memory and Language, 68, 255–278
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bishop, D. V. M. (2005). Test of reception of grammar – Electronic. London: Harcourt Assessment
   Google Scholar
• Burnage, G. (1990). CELEX: A Guide for Users. Nijmegen: CELEX
   Google Scholar
• Burquest, D. A., & Payne, D. L. (1998). Phonological analysis: A functional approach. Dallas: Summer Institute of Linguistics
   Google Scholar
• Bybee, J. L., & Slobin, D. I. (1982). Rules and schemas in the development and use of the English past tense. Language, 58, 265–289
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clements, G. N. (1990). The role of the sonority cycle in core syllabification. Papers in Laboratory Phonology, 1, 283–333
   Google Scholar
• Conti-Ramsden, G., Botting, N., & Faragher, B. (2001). Psycholinguistic markers for specific language impairment (SLI). The Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry and Allied Disciplines, 42, 741–748
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dodd, B., Hua, Z., Crosbie, S., Holm, A., & Ozanne, A. (2002). Diagnostic evaluation of articulation and phonology (DEAP). London: Psychological Corporation
   Google Scholar
• Dunn, L. M., Whetton, C., & Burley, J. (1997). The British picture vocabulary scale. Windsor, England: NFER – Nelson
   Google Scholar
• Eyer, J., & Leonard, L. B. (1994). Learning past tense morphology with Specific Language Impairment: A case study. Child Language Teaching and Therapy, 10, 127–138
   Google Scholar
• Freudenthal, D., Pine, J. M., Aguado Orea, J., & Gobet, F. (2007). Modeling the developmental patterning of finiteness marking in English, Dutch, German, and Spanish using MOSAIC. Cognitive Science, 31, 311–341
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grela, B. G., & Leonard, L. B. (2000). The influence of argument-structure complexity on the use of auxiliary verbs by children with SLI. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 43, 1115–1125
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, B. W., & Morris, S. R. (2007). Clinical implications of the effects of lexical aspect and phonology on children’s production of the regular past tense. Child Language Teaching and Therapy, 23, 287–306
   Google Scholar
• Jones, M., & Conti-Ramsden, G. (1997). A comparison of verb use in children with Specific Language Impairment and their younger siblings. Journal of Speech Language and Hearing Research, 40, 1298–1313
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kavitskaya, D., Babyonyshev, M., Walls, T., & Grigorenko, E. (2011). Investigating the effects of syllable complexity in Russian-speaking children with SLI. Journal of Child Language, 38, 979–998
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leonard, L. B. (2000). Children with specific language impairment. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
   Google Scholar
• Leonard, L. B., Davis, J., & Deevy, P. (2009). Phonotactic probability and past tense use by children with specific language impairment and their typically developing peers. Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics, 21, 747–758
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leonard, L. B., & Deevy, P. (2011). Input distribution influences degree of auxiliary use by children with specific language impairment. Cognitive Linguistics, 22, 247–273
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leonard, L. B., & Eyer, J. A. (1996). Surface properties of grammatical morphology and morphological deficits in children with specific language impairment. In J. Morgan & K. Demuth (Eds.), Signal to syntax (pp. 233–247). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum
   Google Scholar
• Marchman, V., Wulfeck, B., & Ellis Weismer, S. (1999). Morphological productivity in children with normal language and SLI: A study of the English past tense. Journal of Speech Language and Hearing Research, 42, 206–219
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marshall, C. R., Marinis, T., & van der Lely, H. (2007). Passive verb morphology: The effect of phonotactics on passive comprehension in typically developing and Grammatical-SLI children. Lingua, 117, 1434–1447
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marshall, C. R., & van der Lely, H. K. J. (2006). A challenge to current models of past tense inflection: The impact of phonotactics. Cognition, 100, 302–320
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marshall, C. R., & van der Lely, H. K. J. (2007). The impact of phonological complexity on past tense inflection in children with Grammatical-SLI. International Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 9, 191–203
   Google Scholar
• Marshall, C. R., & van der Lely, H. K. J. (2008). Recognition of gated verbs by children with Grammatical-Specific Language Impairment: Effects of inflection and frequency. Journal of Neurolinguistics, 21, 433–451
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matthews, D. E., & Theakston, A. L. (2006). Errors of omission in English-speaking children’s production of plurals and the past tense: The effects of frequency, phonology, and competition. Cognitive Science, 30, 1027–1052
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mayer, M. (1969). Frog, where are you? New York, NY: Dial
   Google Scholar
• Miller, J. F. (1981). Assessing language production in children: Experimental procedures. Baltimore: University Park Press
   Google Scholar
• Oetting, J., & Horohov, J. (1997). Past tense marking by children with and without Specific Language Impairment. Journal of Speech Language and Hearing Research, 40, 62–74
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ott, S., & Hoehle, B. (2013). Verb inflection in German-learning children with typical and atypical language acquisition: The impact of subsyllabic frequencies. Journal of Child Language, 40, 169–192
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pinker, S., & Ullman, M. T. (2002). The past and future of the past tense debate. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 6, 456–463
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Potter, M. C., & Lombardi, L. (1990). Regeneration in the short-term recall of sentences. Journal of Memory and Language, 29, 633–654
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Renfrew, C. (1991). The Bus Story: A test of continuous speech (2nd ed.). Oxford: Old Headington
   Google Scholar
• Renfrew, C. (1997). Action Picture Test. Oxford: Speechmark
   Google Scholar
• Rice, M. L., & Wexler, K. (1996). Toward tense as a clinical marker of specific language impairment in English-speaking children. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 39, 1239–1257
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Rice, M. L., Wexler, K., & Redmond, S. M. (1999). Grammaticality judgments of an extended optional infinitive grammar: Evidence from English-speaking children with specific language impairment. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 42, 943–961
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Riches, N. G. (2012). Sentence repetition in children with specific language impairment: An investigation of underlying mechanisms. International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders, 47, 499–510
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shriberg, L. D., & Kwiatkowski, J. (1982). Phonological disorders IIIA procedure for assessing severity of involvement. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 47, 256–270
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Shriberg, L. D., Tomblin, J. B., & McSweeny, J. L. (1999). Prevalence of speech delay in 6-year-old children and comorbidity with language impairment. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 42, 1461–1481
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Storkel, H. L. (2001). Learning new words: Phonotactic probability in language development. Journal of Speech Language and Hearing Research, 44, 1321–1337
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tallal, P. (1975). Perceptual and linguistic factors in the language impairment of developmental dysphasics: An experimental investigation with the token test. Cortex, 11, 196–205
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Tomblin, J. B., Records, N. L., Buckwalter, P., & Zhang, X. (1997). Prevalence of specific language impairment in kindergarten children. Journal of Speech, Language and Hearing Research, 40, 1245–1260
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ullman, M. T., & Pierpont, E. I. (2005). Specific language impairment is not specific to language: The procedural deficit hypothesis. Cortex, 41, 399–433
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wechsler, D. (2002). Wechsler preschool and primary scale of intelligence (3rd ed.). San Antonio, TX: Pearson
   Google Scholar
• Wiig, E. H., Secord, W., & Semel, E. (1992). Clinical evaluation of language fundamentals – Preschool. San Antonio, TX: The Psychological Corporation
   Google Scholar