Cognitive grammar and aphasic discourse

References

• Armstrong, E. M. (2000). Aphasic discourse analysis: the story so far. Aphasiology, 14, 875–892.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Armstrong, E., Ferguson, A., & Simmons-Mackie, N. (2013). Discourse and functional approaches to aphasia. In I. Papathanasiou, P. Coppens, & C. Potagas (Eds.), Aphasia and related neurogenic communication disorders (pp. 217–231). Burlington, MA: Jones & Bartlett.
   Google Scholar
• Bird, H., & Franklin, S. (1996). Cinderella revisited: a comparison of fluent and non-fluent aphasia. Journal of Neurolinguistics, 9, 187–206.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Black, M., & Chiat, S. (2003). Linguistics for clinicians. London: Arnold Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Byng, S., & Black, M. (1989). Some aspects of sentence production in aphasia. Aphasiology, 3, 241–263.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carragher, M., Sage, K., & Conroy, P. (2014). Preliminary analysis from a novel treatment targeting the exchange of new information within storytelling for people with non-fluent aphasia and their partners. Aphasiology. doi:10.1080/02687038.2014.988110
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chafe, W. (1994). Discourse, consciousness, and time: the flow and displacement of conscious experience in speaking and writing. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Chomsky, N. (1980). Rules and representations. New York: Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Code, C. (2010). Aphasia. In J. S. Damico, N. Müller, & M. J. Ball (Eds.), The handbook of language and speech disorders (pp. 317–336). West Sussex, UK: Wiley-Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Code, C. (2013). Significant landmarks in the history of aphasia and its therapy. In I. Papathanasiou, P. Coppens, & C. Potagas, (Eds.), Aphasia and related neurogenic communication disorders (pp. 3–22). Burlington, MA: Jones & Bartlett Learning.
   Google Scholar
• Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2011). Designing and conducting mixed methods research. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Dipper, L. T., Black, M., & Bryan, K. L. (2005). Thinking for speaking and thinking for listening: the interaction of thought and language in typical and non-fluent comprehension and production. Language and Cognitive Processes, 20(3), 417–441.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dowty, D. R. (1991). Thematic proto-roles and argument selection. Language, 67, 547–619.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doyle, P. J., McNeil, M. R., Park, G., Goda, A., Rubenstein, E., Spencer, K., Carroll, B., Lustig, A., & Szwarc, L. (2000). Linguistic validation of four parallel forms of a story retelling procedure. Aphasiology, 14, 537–549.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Early, E. A., & VanDemark, A. A. (1985). Aphasic speakers’ use of definite and indefinite articles to mark given and new information in discourse. Proceedings of the Clinical Aphasiology Conference, Ashland, OR. Retrieved from http://aphasiology.pitt.edu/archive/00000861/01/15-32.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Evans, V. (2014). The language Myth. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fauconnier, G., & Sweetser, E. (1996). Cognitive links and domains: basic aspects of mental space theory. In G. Fauconnier, & E. Sweetser (Eds.), Spaces, worlds, and grammar. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fodor, J. A. (1983). The modularity of mind. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Garrett, M. (1988). Processes in language production. In F. J. Newmeyer (Ed.), Linguistics: the Cambridge survey, Vol. 111: language: psychological and biological aspects. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Geeraerts, D. (2006). A rough guide to cognitive linguistics. In D. Geeraerts (Ed.), Cognitive linguistics research, 34. Cognitive linguistics: basic readings (pp. 1–28). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
   Google Scholar
• Glosser, G., & Deser, T. (1990). Patterns of discourse production among neurological patients with fluent language disorders. Brain and Language, 40, 67–88.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldberg, A. (1995). Constructions. A construction grammar approach to argument structure. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Halliday, M. A. K., & Hasan, R. (1976). Cohesion in English. London: Longman.
   Google Scholar
• Jackendoff, J. (1997). The architecture of the language faculty. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Langacker, R. W. (1987). Foundations of cognitive grammar, Vol I. Theoretical prerequisites. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Langacker, R. W. (2001). Discourse in cognitive grammar. Cognitive Linguistics, 12, 143–188.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Langacker, R. W. (2008). Cognitive grammar. A basic introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Langacker, R. W. (2009). Investigations in cognitive grammar. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
   Google Scholar
• Lehman Blake, M. (2010). Communication deficits associated with right hemisphere brain damage. In J. S. Damico, N. Miller, & M. J. Ball (Eds.), The handbook of language and speech disorders (pp. 556–576). West Sussex, UK: Wiley-Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Lemme, M. L., Hedberg, N. L., & Bottenberg, D. E. (1984). Cohesion in narratives of aphasic adults. In R. Brookshire (Ed.), Clinical aphasiology conference proceedings. Minneapolis: BRK Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Lock, S., & Armstrong, L. (1997). Cohesion analysis of the expository discourse of normal, fluent aphasic and demented adults: a role in differential diagnosis? Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics, 11(4), 299–317.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marshall, J. (2013). Disorders of sentence processing in aphasia. In I. Papathanasiou, P. Coppens, & C. Potagas (Eds.), Aphasia and related neurogenic communication disorders (pp. 197–216). Burlington, MA: Jones & Bartlett.
   Google Scholar
• Miceli, G., Silveri, M. C., Romani, C., & Caramazza, A. (1989). Variation in the patterns of omissions and substitutions of grammatical morphemes in the spontaneous speech of so-called agrammatic patients. Brain and Language, 36, 447–492.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mozeiko, J., Lé, K., & Coelho, C. (2010). Traumatic brain injury. In J. S. Damico, N. Miller, & M. J. Ball (Eds.), The handbook of language and speech disorders (pp. 577–599). West Sussex, UK: Wiley-Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Nicholas, M., Obler, L., Albert, M. L., & Helm-Estabrooks, N. (1985). Empty speech in Alzheimer’s disease and fluent aphasia. Journal of Speech and Hearing Researcher, 28, 405–410.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Nicholas, L. E., & Brookshire, R. H. (1993). A system for quantifying the informativeness and efficiency of the connected speech of adults with aphasia. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 42, 626–648.
   Google Scholar
• Pustejovsky, J. (1995). The generative lexicon. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ramsberger, G. (2005). Achieving conversational success in aphasia by focusing on non-linguistic cognitive skills: a potentially promising new approach. Aphasiology, 19, 1066–1073.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saeed, J. I. (2007). Semantics, 2nd Edition. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Saffran, E. M., Berndt, R. S., & Schwartz, M. F. (1989). The quantitative analysis of agrammatic production: procedure and data. Brain and Language, 37, 440–479.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SALTSoftware. (2014). Segmenting utterances into C-Units. Retrieved from http://www.saltsoftware.com/coursefiles/shared/Cunits.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Slobin, D. I. (1991). Learning to think for speaking: native language, cognition, and rhetorical style. Pragmatics, 1(1), 7–25.
   Google Scholar
• Swinburn, K., Baker, G., & Howard, D. (1997). The Comprehensive Aphasia Test. Unpublished.
   Google Scholar
• Talmy, L. (2003). Concept structuring systems in language. In M. Tomasello (Ed.), The new psychology of language. Cognitive and functional approaches to language structure, Vol. II (pp. 15–46). New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc., Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Tomasello, M. (2010). Cognitive linguistics and first language acquisition. In D. Geeraerts, & H. Cuyckens (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of cognitive linguistics (pp. 1092–1112). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ungerer, F., & Schmid, H. (2006). An introduction to cognitive linguistics. 2nd Edition. Harlow, UK: Pearson Education Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Varley, R. (2014). Reason without much language. Language Sciences, 46, 232–244.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Varley, R., & Siegal, M. (2000). Evidence for cognition without grammar from causal reasoning and ‘theory of mind’ in an agrammatic aphasic patient. Current Biology, 10, 723–726.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Webster, J. (1999). A semantic and syntactic analysis of aphasic speech (PhD dissertation). University of Newcastle upon Tyne.
   Google Scholar
• Wertz, R., Deal, J. L., & Robinson, A. J. (1984). Classifying the aphasias: a comparison of the Boston diagnostic aphasia examination and the Western aphasia battery. Proceedings of the Clinical Aphasiology Conference, Seabrook Island, SC. Retrieved from http://aphasiology.pitt.edu/archive/00000794/01/14-06.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Whitworth, A. (2010). Using narrative as a bridge: linking language processing models with real-life communications. Seminars in Speech and Language, 31, 64–76.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Whitworth, A., Claessen, M., Leitao, S., & Webster, J. (2015). Beyond narrative: is there an implicit structure to the way in which adults organise their discourse? Clinical Linguistics and Phonetics, 29(6), 455–481.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar