Linguistic analysis of discourse in aphasia: A review of the literature

References

• Armstrong, E. (2000). Aphasic discourse analysis: the story so far. Aphasiology, 14(9), 875–892.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Armstrong, L., Brady, M., Mackenzie, C., & Norrie, J. (2007). Transcription-less analysis of aphasic discourse: a clinicians dream or a possibility? Aphasiology, 21(3–4), 355–374.
   Google Scholar
• Armstrong, E., Ciccone, N., Godecke, E., & Kok, B. (2011). Monologues and dialogues in aphasia: some initial comparisons. Aphasiology, 25(11), 1347–1371.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Armstrong, E., Ferguson, A., & Simmons-Mackie, N. (2013). Discourse and functional approaches to aphasia. In I. Papathanasiou, P. Coppens & C. Potagas (Eds.), Aphasia and related neurogenic communication disorders (pp. 217–232). Boston, MA: Jones and Bartlett Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Ball, M. J., Howard, S., Müller, N., & Granese, A. (2013). Data processing: transcriptional and impressionistic methods. In N. Müller & M. J. Ball (Eds.), Research methods in clinical linguistics and phonetics: a practical guide (pp. 177–194). West Sussex, UK: Wiley-Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Ballard, K. J., & Thompson, C. K. (1999). Treatment and generalization of complex sentence production in agrammatism. Journal of Speech Language & Hearing Research, 42(3), 690–707.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beeke, S., Maxim, J., & Wilkinson, R. (2008). Rethinking agrammatism: factors affecting the form of language elicited via clinical test procedures. Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics, 22(4–5), 317–323.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boles, L. (1998). Conversational discourse analysis as a method for evaluating progress in aphasia: a case report. Journal of Communication Disorders, 31, 261–274.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brady, M., Kelly, H., Godwin, J., & Enderby, P. (2012). Speech and language therapy for aphasia following stroke. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 16(5). doi:10.1002/14651858.CD000425.pub3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brookshire, R. H., & Nicholas, L. E. (1994). Speech sample-size and test-retest stability of connected speech measures for adults with aphasia. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 37(2), 399–407.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Capilouto, G. J., Wright, H. H., & Wagovich, S. A. (2006). Reliability of main event measurement in the discourse of individuals with aphasia. Aphasiology, 20(2–4), 205–216.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chapman, S. B., & Ulatowska, H. K. (1992). Methodology for discourse management in the treatment of aphasia. Clinical Communication Disorders, 2(1), 64–81.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Cherney, L. R. (1998). Pragmatics and discourse: an introduction. In L. R. Cherney, B. B. Shadden & C. A. Coelho (Eds.), Analyzing discourse in communicatively impaired adults (pp. 1–8). Gaithersburg, Maryland: Aspen Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Coelho, C. A., Grela, B., Corso, M., Gamble, A., & Feinn, R. (2005). Microlinguistic deficits in the narrative discourse of adults with traumatic brain injury. Brain Injury, 19(13), 1139–1145.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crystal, D., Fletcher, P., & Garman, M. (1976). The grammatical analysis of language disability. London: Edward Arnold.
   Google Scholar
• Doyle, P. J., McNeil, M. R., Spencer, K. A., Goda, A. J., Cottrell, K., & Lustig, A. P. (1998). The effects of concurrent picture presentations on retelling of orally presented stories by adults with aphasia. Aphasiology, 12(7–8), 561–574.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elia, D., Liles, B. Z., Duffy, R. J., Coelho, C. A., & Belanger, S. A. (1994). An investigation of sample size in conversational analysis. Paper presented at the ASHA Convention, New Orleans, Louisiana.
   Google Scholar
• Frederiksen, C. H., Bracewell, R. J., Breuleux, A., & Renaud, A. (1990). The cognitive representation and processing of discourse: function and dysfunction. In Y. Joanette & H. H. Brownwell (Eds.), Discourse ability and brain damage: theoretical and empirical perspectives (pp. 69–112). New York, NY: Springer-Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Goodglass, H., Kaplan, E., & Barresi, B. (2001). Boston Diagnostic Aphasia Examination (3rd ed.). Philadelphia: Lippencott, Williams & Wilkins.
   Google Scholar
• Gordon, J. K. (2006). A quantitative production analysis of picture description. Aphasiology, 20(2–4), 188–204.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herbert, R., Hickin, J., Howard, D., Osborne, F., & Best, W. (2008). Do picture-naming tests provide a valid assessment of lexical retrieval in conversation in aphasia? Aphasiology, 22(2), 184–203.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huber, W. (1990). Text comprehension and production in aphasia: analysis in terms of micro- and macroprocessing. In Y. Joanette & H. H. Brownwell (Eds.), Discourse ability in brain damage: theoretical and empirical perspectives (pp. 154–179). New York, NY: Springer-Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Jaecks, P., Hielscher-Fastabend, M., & Stenneken, P. (2012). Diagnosing residual aphasia using spontaneous speech analysis. Aphasiology, 26(7), 953–970.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kemper, S., McDowd, J., Pohl, P., Herman, R., & Jackson, S. (2006). Revealing language deficits following stroke: the cost of doing two things at once. Aging, Neuropsychology, and Cognition, 13(1), 115–139.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, E. C., Volpe, A. D., Ritterman, S., & Williams, S. E. (1996). Variations in grammatic complexity across three types of discourse. Journal of Speech-Language Pathology and Audiology, 30, 180–186.
   Google Scholar
• Lock, S., & Armstrong, L. (1997). Cohesion analysis of the expository discourse of normal, fluent aphasic and demented adults: a role in differential diagnosis? Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics, 11(4), 299–317.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacWhinney, B. (2000). The CHILDES Project: tools for analysing talk (3rd ed.). Muhwah, NJ: Lawrence.
   Google Scholar
• MacWhinney, B., Fromm, D., Forbes, M., & Holland, A. (2011). AphasiaBank: methods for studying discourse. Aphasiology, 25(11), 1286–1307.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marini, A., Andreetta, S., del Tin, S., & Carlomagno, S. (2011). A multi-level approach to the analysis of narrative language in aphasia. Aphasiology, 25(11), 1372–1392.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maul, K. K., Conner, P. S., Kempler, D., Radvanski, C., & Goral, M. (2014). Using informative verbal exchanges to promote verb retrieval in nonfluent aphasia. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 23(4), 407–420.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mayer, J., & Murray, L. (2003). Functional measures of naming in aphasia: word retrieval in confrontation naming versus connected speech. Aphasiology, 17(5), 481–497.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McEntee, L. J., & Kennedy, M. (1995). Profiling agrammatic spoken language: towards a government and binding framework. European Journal of Disorders of Communication, 30(3), 317–332.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Miller, J., & Iglesias, A. (2012). Systematic Analysis of Language Transcripts (SALT) (Version Research version 2012). Middleton, WI: SALT Software, LLC.
   Google Scholar
• Murray, L. L., Holland, A. L., & Beeson, P. M. (1998). Spoken language of individuals with mild fluent aphasia under focused and divided-attention conditions. Journal of Speech Language & Hearing Research, 41(1), 213–227.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nicholas, L. E., & Brookshire, R. H. (1993). A system for quantifying the informativeness and efficiency of the connected speech of adults with aphasia. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 36(2), 338–350.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Nicholas, L. E., & Brookshire, R. H. (1995). Presence, completeness, and accuracy of Main Concepts in the connected speech of non-brain-damaged adults and adults with aphasia. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 38(1), 145–156.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Olness, G. S. (2006). Genre, verb, and coherence in picture-elicited discourse of adults with aphasia. Aphasiology, 20(2–4), 175–187.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prins, R., & Bastiaanse, R. (2004). Analysing the spontaneous speech of aphasic speakers. Aphasiology, 18(12), 1075–1091.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Purdy, M. H. (2002). Script knowledge following stroke. Journal of Medical Speech-Language Pathology, 10(3), 173–181.
   Google Scholar
• Rutter, B., & Cunningham, S. (2013). The recording of audio and video data. In N. Müller & M. J. Ball (Eds.), Research methods in clinical linguistics and phonetics: a practical guide (pp. 160–176). West Sussex, UK: Wiley-Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Sacks, H., Schegloff, E. A., & Jefferson, G. (1974). A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation. Language, 50, 696–735.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saffran, E. M., Berndt, R. S., & Schwartz, M. F. (1989). The quantitative analysis of agrammatic production: procedure and data. Brain & Language, 37(3), 440–479.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sherratt, S. (2007). Multi-level discourse analysis: a feasible approach. Aphasiology, 21(3–4), 375–393.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shewan, C. M. (1988). The Shewan Spontaneous Language Analysis (SSLA) system for aphasic adults: description, reliability and validity. Journal of Communication Disorders, 21, 103–138.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simmons-Mackie, N., & Lynch, K. (2013). Qualitative research in aphasia: a review of the literature. Aphasiology, 27(11), 1281–1301.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Togher, L. (2001). Discourse sampling in the 21st century. Journal of Communication Disorders, 34(1–2), 131–150.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ulatowska, H. K., Allard, L., & Chapman, S. B. (1990). Narrative and procedural discourse in aphasia. In Y. Joanette & H. H. Brownwell (Eds.), Discourse ability and brain damage: theoretical and empirical perspectives (pp. 180–198). New York, NY: Springer-Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Ulatowska, H. K., Allard, L., Reyes, B. A., Ford, J., & Chapman, S. (1992). Conversational discourse in aphasia. Aphasiology, 6(3), 325–330.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ulatowska, H. K., Doyle, A. W., Freedman-Stern, R., & Macaluso-Haynes, S. (1983). Production of procedural discourse in aphasia. Brain and Language, 18, 315–341.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ulatowska, H. K., Olness, G. S., Wertz, R. T., Samson, A. M., Keebler, M. W., & Goins, K. E. (2003). Relationship between discourse and Western Aphasia Battery performance in African Americans with aphasia. Aphasiology, 17(5), 511–521.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams, S. E., Li, E. C., Volpe, A. D., & Ritterman, S. (1994). The influence of topic and listener familiarity on aphasic discourse. Journal of Communication Disorders, 27, 207–222.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• World Health Organization. (2011). ICF: International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization.
   Google Scholar
• Yorkston, K. M., & Beukelman, D. R. (1980). An analysis of connected speech samples of aphasic and normal speakers. Journal of Speech & Hearing Disorders, 45(1), 27–36.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar