Using an In Vitro Model of Lipid Deposition to Assess the Efficiency of Hydrogen Peroxide Solutions to Remove Lipid from Various Contact Lens Materials

REFERENCES

• Morgan P. Trends in UK contact lens prescribing 2007. Optician 2007; 234 (6104): 16–17.
   Google Scholar
• Morgan PB, Efron N. A decade of contact lens prescribing trends in the United Kingdom (1996-2005). Cont Lens Anterior Eye 2006;29:59–68.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Chang DC, Grant GB, O’Donnell K et al. Fusarium Keratitis Investigation Team. Multistate outbreak of Fusarium keratitis associated with use of a contact lens solution. JAMA 2006;296:953–963.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Joslin CE, Tu EY, Shoff ME et al. The association of contact lens solution use and Acanthamoeba keratitis. Am J Ophthalmol 2007;144:169–180.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saw SM, Ooi PL, Tan DT et al. Risk factors for contact lens-related fusarium keratitis: a case-control study in Singapore. Arch Ophthalmol 2007;125:611–617.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Jones L, Jones D, Houlford M. Clinical comparison of three polyhexanide-preserved multi-purpose contact lens solutions. Cont Lens Anterior Eye 1997;20:23–30.
   Google Scholar
• Jones L, MacDougall N, Sorbara LG. Asymptomatic corneal staining associated with the use of balafilcon silicone-hydrogel contact lenses disinfected with a polyaminopropyl biguanide-preserved care regimen. Optom Vis Sci 2002;79:753–761.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garofalo RJ, Dassanayake N, Carey C et al. Corneal staining and subjective symptoms with multipurpose solutions as a function of time. Eye Contact Lens 2005;31:166–174.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gasset AR, Ramer RM, Katzin D. Hydrogen peroxide sterilization of hydrophilic contact lenses. Arch Ophthalmol 1975;93:412–415.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones L, Christie C. Soft contact lens solutions reveiw: Part 2: Modern-generation care system. Optom Prac 2008; 9: 43–62.
   Google Scholar
• Phillips A. The cleaning of hydrogel contact lenses. Ophthalm Optician 1980; 20: 375–388.
   Google Scholar
• Houlsby RD, Ghajar M, Chavez G. Microbiological evaluation of soft contact lens disinfecting solutions. J Am Optom Assoc 1984;55:205–211.
   Google Scholar
• Shih K, Hu J, Sibley M. The microbiological benefit of cleaning and rinsing contact lenses. ICLC 1985; 12: 235–242.
   Google Scholar
• Ketelson HA, Meadows DL, Stone RP. Dynamic wettability properties of a soft contact lens hydrogel. Colloids Surf B Biointerfaces 2005;40:1–9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tonge S, Jones L, Goodall S, Tighe B. The ex vivo wettability of soft contact lenses. Curr Eye Res 2001;23:51–59.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Franklin VJ. Cleaning efficacy of single-purpose surfactant cleaners and multi-purpose solutions. Cont Lens Anterior Eye 1997;20:63–68.
   Google Scholar
• Reindel W, Ploscowe V, Minno G et al. Comparison study of hydrophilic contact lens surfactant cleaners: a clinical evaluation of residual deposits. ICLC 1989; 16: 232–236.
   Google Scholar
• Morgan PB, Efron N, Helland M et al. Twenty first century trends in silicone hydrogel contact lens fitting: an international perspective. Cont Lens Anterior Eye 2010;33:196–198.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alvord L, Court J, Davis T et al. Oxygen permeability of a new type of high Dk soft contact lens material. Optom Vis Sci 1998;75:30–36.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kunzler J. Silicone-based hydrogels for contact lens applications. Cont Lens Spectr 1999; 14 (Supp 8): 9–11.
   Google Scholar
• Nicolson PC, Vogt J. Soft contact lens polymers: an evolution. Biomaterials 2001;22:3273–3283.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tighe B. Silicone hydrogels: Structure, properties and behaviour.. In: Sweeney D. Silicone Hydrogels: Continuous Wear Contact Lenses. Oxford: Butterworth-Heinemann, 2004; 1–27.
   Google Scholar
• Bruinsma GM, van der Mei HC, Busscher HJ. Bacterial adhesion to surface hydrophilic and hydrophobic contact lenses. Biomaterials 2001;22:3217–3224.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheng L, Muller SJ, Radke CJ. Wettability of silicone-hydrogel contact lenses in the presence of tear-film components. Curr Eye Res 2004;28:93–108.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Court JL, Redman RP, Wang JH et al. A novel phosphorylcholine-coated contact lens for extended wear use. Biomaterials 2001;22:3261–3272.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones L, Long J, Chen P. The impact of contact lens care regimens on the in vitro wettability of conventional and silicone-hydrogel contact lens materials. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2002: ARVO abstract #3097
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones L, Senchyna M, Glasier MA et al. Lysozyme and lipid deposition on silicone hydrogel contact lens materials. Eye Contact Lens 2003;29:S75–9; discussion S83.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Carney FP, Nash WL, Sentell KB. The adsorption of major tear film lipids in vitro to various silicone hydrogels over time. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2008;49:120–124.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lorentz H, Heynen M, Kay LM et al. Contact lens physical properties and lipid deposition in a novel characterized artificial tear solution. Mol Vis 2011;17:3392–3405.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lorentz H, Heynen M, Trieu D et al. The impact of tear film components on in vitro lipid uptake. Optom Vis Sci 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Chow LM, Subbaraman LN, Sheardown H et al. Kinetics of in vitro lactoferrin deposition on silicone hydrogel and FDA group II and group IV hydrogel contact lens materials. J Biomater Sci Polym Ed 2009;20:71–82.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prager MD, Quintana RP. Radiochemical studies on contact lens soilation. II. Lens uptake of cholesteryl oleate and dioleoyl phosphatidylcholine. J Biomed Mater Res 1997;37:207–211.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prager MD, Quintana RP. Radiochemical studies on contact lens soilation. I. Lens uptake of 14C-lysozyme from simple and complex artificial tear solutions. J Biomed Mater Res 1997;36:119–124.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Subbaraman LN, Glasier MA, Senchyna M et al. Kinetics of in vitro lysozyme deposition on silicone hydrogel, PMMA, and FDA groups I, II, and IV contact lens materials. Curr Eye Res 2006;31:787–796.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suwala M, Glasier MA, Subbaraman LN et al. Quantity and conformation of lysozyme deposited on conventional and silicone hydrogel contact lens materials using an in vitro model. Eye Contact Lens 2007;33:138–143.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Garrett Q, Garrett RW, Milthorpe BK. Lysozyme sorption in hydrogel contact lenses. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1999;40:897–903.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lorentz HI. (2012). Modeling in vitro lipid deposition on silicone hydrogel and conventional hydrogel contact lens materials. Waterloo, Ont: University of Waterloo.
   Google Scholar
• Jones L, Senchyna M. Soft contact lens solutions review part 1: Components of modern care regimens. Optom Pract 2007; 8: 45–56.
   Google Scholar
• Zhao Z, Carnt NA, Aliwarga Y et al. Care regimen and lens material influence on silicone hydrogel contact lens deposition. Optom Vis Sci 2009;86:251–259.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheung SW, Cho P, Chan B et al. A comparative study of biweekly disposable contact lenses: silicone hydrogel versus hydrogel. Clin Exp Optom 2007;90:124–131.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pucker AD, Thangavelu M, Nichols JJ. In vitro lipid deposition on hydrogel and silicone hydrogel contact lenses. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2010;51:6334–6340.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iwata M, Ohno S, Kawai T et al. In vitro evaluation of lipids adsorbed on silicone hydrogel contact lenses using a new gas chromatography/mass spectrometry analytical method. Eye Contact Lens 2008;34:272–280.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maziarz EP, Stachowski MJ, Liu XM et al. Lipid deposition on silicone hydrogel lenses, part I: quantification of oleic Acid, oleic Acid methyl ester, and cholesterol. Eye Contact Lens 2006;32:300–307.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Jones L, Evans K, Sariri R et al. Lipid and protein deposition of N-vinyl pyrrolidone-containing group II and group IV frequent replacement contact lenses. CLAO J 1997;23:122–126.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Jones L, Fcoptom, Mann A et al. An in vivo comparison of the kinetics of protein and lipid deposition on group II and group IV frequent-replacement contact lenses. Optom Vis Sci 2000;77:503–510.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bontempo AR, Rapp J. Protein-lipid interaction on the surface of a hydrophilic contact lens in vitro. Curr Eye Res 1997;16:776–781.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bontempo AR, Rapp J. Protein-lipid interaction on the surface of a rigid gas-permeable contact lens in vitro. Curr Eye Res 1997;16:1258–1262.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones L, Dumbleton K. Silicone hydrogel contact lenses: Part 1 Evolution and Current Status. Optom Today 2002;42:26–31.
   Google Scholar
• Lira M, Santos L, Azeredo J et al. Comparative study of silicone-hydrogel contact lenses surfaces before and after wear using atomic force microscopy. J Biomed Mater Res Part B Appl Biomater 2008;85:361–367.
   Google Scholar
• González-Méijome JM, López-Alemany A, Almeida JB et al. Surface AFM microscopy of unworn and worn samples of silicone hydrogel contact lenses. J Biomed Mater Res Part B Appl Biomater 2009;88:75–82.
   Google Scholar
• González-Méijome JM, López-Alemany A, Almeida JB et al. Microscopic observation of unworn siloxane-hydrogel soft contact lenses by atomic force microscopy. J Biomed Mater Res Part B Appl Biomater 2006;76:412–418.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• González-Méijome JM, López-Alemany A, Almeida JB et al. Microscopic observations of superficial ultrastructure of unworn siloxane-hydrogel contact lenses by cryo-scanning electron microscopy. J Biomed Mater Res Part B Appl Biomater 2006;76:419–423.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• López-Alemany A, Compañ V, Refojo MF. Porous structure of Purevision versus Focus Night&Day and conventional hydrogel contact lenses. J Biomed Mater Res 2002;63:319–325.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steffen R, Schnider C. A next generation silicone hydrogel lens for daily wear. Part 1—Material properties. Optician 2004;227(5954):23–25.
   Google Scholar
• Bontempo AR, Rapp J. Protein and lipid deposition onto hydrophilic contact lenses in vivo. CLAO J 2001;27:75–80.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Garrett Q, Chatelier RC, Griesser HJ et al. Effect of charged groups on the adsorption and penetration of proteins onto and into carboxymethylated poly(HEMA) hydrogels. Biomaterials 1998;19:2175–2186.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garrett Q, Laycock B, Garrett RW. Hydrogel lens monomer constituents modulate protein sorption. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2000;41:1687–1695.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Allsopp G, Young G. The product performance of a one-step peroxide care system. Optician 1995;209(5496):25–27.
   Google Scholar
• Kiel JS. Protein removal from soft contact lens using disinfection/neutralization with hydrogen peroxide/catalytic disc. Clin Ther 1993;15:30–35.
   Google Scholar
• Pritchard N, Fonn D, Weed K. Ocular and subjective responses to frequent replacement of daily wear soft contact lenses. CLAO J 1996;22:53–59.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Nilsson SE, Andersson L. Contact lens wear in dry environments. Acta Ophthalmol (Copenh) 1986;64:221–225.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fonn D, Pritchard N, Brazeau D et al. Discontinuation of contact lens wear: The numbers, reasons and patient profiles. [ARVO Abstracts]. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1995;36:S927. Abstract 877.
   Google Scholar
• Jones L, Franklin V, Evans K et al. Spoilation and clinical performance of monthly vs. three monthly Group II disposable contact lenses. Optom Vis Sci 1996;73:16–21.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gellatly KW, Brennan NA, Efron N. Visual decrement with deposit accumulation of HEMA contact lenses. Am J Optom Physiol Opt 1988;65:937–941.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Jones D, Jones L, Franklin V et al. Multi-purpose solution effects on the clinical performance and spoilation of daily-wear monthly planned replacement contact lenses. Optom Vis Sci 1998;75 suppl:276.
   Google Scholar
• Schnider C. Clinical performance and effect of care regimen on surface deposition of galyfilcon A contact lenses. Optom Vis Sci 2005;82: E-abstract 055102.
   Google Scholar
• Ghormley NR, Jones L. Managing lipid deposition on silicone hydrogel lenses. Contact Lens Spectrum 2006;21(1):21.
   Google Scholar
• Quesnel NM, Giasson CJ. On-eye dehydration of proclear, resolution 55G and acuvue contact lenses. Cont Lens Anterior Eye 2001;24:88–93.
   Google Scholar
• Young G, Port MJA, Bowers RJW. Performance review of a biomimetic contact lens. Optician 1995;210(5509):23–30.
   Google Scholar
• Lebow K, Bridgewater B. A three-month comparative daily-wear study of two high-water-content soft lenses. ICLC 1997;26:198–206.
   Google Scholar
• Benelli U. Systane lubricant eye drops in the management of ocular dryness. Clin Ophthalmol 2011;5:783–790.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Systane® Balance lubricant eye drops. 2011, Available at: http://www.systane.com. Accessed March 27,2012.
   Google Scholar
• Heynen M, Lorentz H, Srinivasan S et al. Quantification of non-polar lipid deposits on senofilcon a contact lenses. Optom Vis Sci 2011;88:1172–1179.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saville JT, Zhao Z, Willcox MD et al. Detection and quantification of tear phospholipids and cholesterol in contact lens deposits: the effect of contact lens material and lens care solution. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2010;51:2843–2851.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar