Comparison of Gebauer SLc and Moria CBm Carriazo-Barraquer ALK Microkeratomes for Descemet’s Stripping Automated Endothelial Keratoplasty Preparation

REFERENCES

• Maeno A, Naor J, Lee HM, Hunter WS, Rootman DS. Three decades of corneal transplantation: indications and patient characteristics. Cornea 2000;19:7–11
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Melles GR, Eggink FA, Lander F, Pels E, Rietveld FJ, Beekhuis WH, et al. A surgical technique for posterior lamellar keratoplasty. Cornea 1998;17:618–626
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Price FW Jr, Price MO. Descemet’s stripping with endothelial keratoplasty in 50 eyes: a refractive neutral corneal transplant. J Refract Surg (Thorofare, NJ: 1995). 2005;21:339–345
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Terry MA, Shamie N, Chen ES, Hoar KL, Friend DJ. Endothelial keratoplasty a simplified technique to minimize graft dislocation, iatrogenic graft failure, and pupillary block. Ophthalmology 2008;115:1179–1186
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vajaranant TS, Price MO, Price FW, Gao W, Wilensky JT, Edward DP. Visual acuity and intraocular pressure after Descemet’s stripping endothelial keratoplasty in eyes with and without preexisting glaucoma. Ophthalmology 2009;116:1644–1650
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Price MO, Price FW Jr. Descemet’s stripping with endothelial keratoplasty: comparative outcomes with microkeratome-dissected and manually dissected donor tissue. Ophthalmology 2006;113:1936–1942
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee WB, Jacobs DS, Musch DC, Kaufman SC, Reinhart WJ, Shtein RM. Descemet’s stripping endothelial keratoplasty: safety and outcomes: a report by the American Academy of Ophthalmology. Ophthalmology 2009;116:1818–1830
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gorovoy MS. Descemet-stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty. Cornea 2006;25:886–889
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Busin M. [DSAEK for the treatment of endothelial disease: results in the initial 100 cases]. Klinische Monatsblatter fur Augenheilkunde 2009;226:757–760
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Springs CL, Joseph MA, Odom JV, Wiley LA. Predictability of donor lamellar graft diameter and thickness in an artificial anterior chamber system. Cornea 2002;21:696–699
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shinton AJ, Tsatsos M, Konstantopoulos A, Goverdhan S, Elsahn AF, Anderson DF, et al. Impact of graft thickness on visual acuity after Descemet’s stripping endothelial keratoplasty. Br J Ophthamol 2012;96:246–249
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Woodward MA, Raoof-Daneshvar D, Mian S, Shtein RM. Relationship of visual acuity and lamellar thickness in descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty. Cornea 2013;32:e69–e73
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Neff KD, Biber JM, Holland EJ. Comparison of central corneal graft thickness to visual acuity outcomes in endothelial keratoplasty. Cornea 2011;30:388–391
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maier AK, Gundlach E, Klamann MK, Gonnermann J, Bertelmann E, Joussen AM, et al. [Influence of donor lamella thickness on visual acuity after Descemet’s stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty (DSAEK)]. Der Ophthalmologe: Zeitschrift der Deutschen Ophthalmologischen Gesellschaft 2014;111:128–134
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Busin M, Madi S, Santorum P, Scorcia V, Beltz J. Ultrathin descemet’s stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty with the microkeratome double-pass technique: two-year outcomes. Ophthalmology 2013;120:1186–1194
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hermel M, Salla S, Hamsley N, Steinfeld A, Walter P. Detection of contamination during organ culture of the human cornea. Graefe’s archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie 2010;248:117–126
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Riau AK, Liu YC, Lwin NC, Ang HP, Tan NY, Yam GH, et al. Comparative study of nJ- and muJ-energy level femtosecond lasers: evaluation of flap adhesion strength, stromal bed quality, and tissue responses. Investig Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2014;55:3186–3194
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ang M, Chaurasia SS, Angunawela RI, Poh R, Riau A, Tan D, et al. Femtosecond lenticule extraction (FLEx): clinical results, interface evaluation, and intraocular pressure variation. Investig Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2012;53:1414–1421
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kunert KS, Blum M, Duncker GI, Sietmann R, Heichel J. Surface quality of human corneal lenticules after femtosecond laser surgery for myopia comparing different laser parameters. Graefe’s archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie 2011;249:1417–1424
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flanagan GW, Binder PS. Precision of flap measurements for laser in situ keratomileusis in 4428 eyes. J Refract Surg 2003;19:113–123
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gailitis RP, Lagzdins M. Factors that affect corneal flap thickness with the Hansatome microkeratome. J Refract Surg 2002;18:439–443
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Solomon KD, Donnenfeld E, Sandoval HP, Al Sarraf O, Kasper TJ, Holzer MP, et al. Flap thickness accuracy: Comparison of 6 microkeratome models. J Cataract Refract Surg 2004;30:964–977
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Price MO, Price FW Jr, Stoeger C, Soper M, Locke GD, Bavuso T. Central thickness variation in precut DSAEK donor grafts. J Cataract Refract Surg 2008;34:1423–144
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Busin M, Patel AK, Scorcia V, Ponzin D. Microkeratome-assisted preparation of ultrathin grafts for descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty. Investig Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2012;53:521–524
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruzza A, Salvalaio G, Bruni A, Frigo AC, Busin M, Ponzin D. Banking of donor tissues for descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty. Cornea 2013;32:70–75
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tang M, Ward D, Ramos JL, Li Y, Schor P, Huang D. Measurements of microkeratome cuts in donor corneas with ultrasound and optical coherence tomography. Cornea 2012;31:145–149
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li Y, Shekhar R, Huang D. Corneal pachymetry mapping with high-speed optical coherence tomography. Ophthalmology 2006;113:792–799 e2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khurana RN, Li Y, Tang M, Lai MM, Huang D. High-speed optical coherence tomography of corneal opacities. Ophthalmology 2007;114:1278–1285
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sikder S, Nordgren RN, Neravetla SR, Moshirfar M. Ultra-thin donor tissue preparation for endothelial keratoplasty with a double-pass microkeratome. Am J Ophthalmol 2011;152:202–208 e2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rose L, Briceno CA, Stark WJ, Gloria DG, Jun AS. Assessment of eye bank-prepared posterior lamellar corneal tissue for endothelial keratoplasty. Ophthalmology 2008;115:279–286
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mootha VV, Heck E, Verity SM, Petroll WM, Lakshman N, Muftuoglu O, et al. Comparative study of descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty donor preparation by Moria CBm microkeratome, horizon microkeratome, and Intralase FS60. Cornea 2011;30:320–324
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar