Initiation of postpartum contraception: A survey among health centre physicians and nurses in Finland

References

• Glasier AF, Logan J, McGlew TJ. Who gives advice about postpartum contraception? Contraception 1996;53:217–20.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ross JA, Winfrey WL. Contraceptive use, intention to use and unmet need during the extended postpartum period. Int Fam Plann Perspect 2001;27:20–7.
   Google Scholar
• Vikhlyaeva E, Nikolaeva E, Brandrup-Lukanow A. Contraceptive use and family planning after labor in the European part of the Russian Federation: 2-year monitoring. Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care 2001;6:219–26.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vikat A, Kosunen E, Rimpelä M. Risk of postpartum induced abortion in Finland: A register-based study. Perspect Sex Reprod Health 2002;34:84–90.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaharuza FM, Sabroe S, Basso O. Choice and chance: Determinants of short interpregnancy intervals in Denmark. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2001;80:532–8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Conde-Agudelo A, Rosas-Bermudez A, Kafury-Goeta AC. Birth spacing and risk of adverse perinatal outcomes: A meta-analysis. JAMA 2006;295:1809–23.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DaVanzo J, Hale L, Razzaque A, Rahman M. Effects of interpregnancy interval and outcome of the preceding pregnancy on pregnancy outcomes in Matlab, Bangladesh. BJOG 2007;114:1079–87.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeFranco EA, Stamilio DM, Boslaugh SE, Gross GA, Muglia LJ. A short interpregnancy interval is a risk factor for preterm birth and its recurrence. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2007;197:264.e1–264.e6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Conde-Agudelo A, Rosas-Bermudez A, Kafury-Goeta AC. Effects of birth spacing on maternal health: A systematic review. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2007;196:297–308.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Speroff L, Mishell DR, Jr. The postpartum visit: It's time for a change in order to optimally initiate contraception. Contraception 2008;78:90–8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campbell OM, Gray RH. Characteristics and determinants of postpartum ovarian function in women in the United States. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1993;169:55–60.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van der Wijden C, Kleijnen J, Van den Berk T. Lactational amenorrhea for family planning. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2003;4.
   Google Scholar
• Erkkola M, Pigg HM, Virta-Autio P, Hekkala A, Hyppönen E, Knip M, . Infant feeding patterns in the Finnish type I diabetes prediction and prevention nutrition study cohort. Eur J Clin Nutr 2005;59:107–13.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levitt C, Shaw E, Wong S, Kaczorowski J, Springate R, Sellors J, . Systematic review of the literature on postpartum care: Selected contraception methods, postpartum Papanicolaou test, and rubella immunization. Birth 2004;31:203–12.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• World Health Organization. Medical eligibility criteria for contraceptive use. 3rd ed. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2004. Available at: http://www.who.int/reproductivehealth/publications/family_planning/9241562668/en/index.html.
   Google Scholar
• Faculty of Family Planning & Reproductive Health Care. FFPRHC Guidance (July 2004): Contraceptive choices for breastfeeding women. J Fam Plann Reprod Health Care 2004;30:181–9.
   Google Scholar
• Viisainen K. Seulontatutkimukset ja yhteistyö äitiyshuollossa. Suositukset 1999 [Screening and collaboration in maternity care. Recommendations 1999]. Helsinki: STAKES National Research and Development Centre for Welfare and Health; 1999. Available at: www.stakes.fi/verkkojulkaisut/Muut/op34_1999.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Lääkärin käsikirja ja tietokanta. Duodecim Medical Publications. [English version EBM Guidelines]. Available at: http://www.duodecimpublications.com/.
   Google Scholar
• Sannisto T, Kosunen E. Promotion of adolescent sexual health in primary care: Survey in Finnish health centres. Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care 2009;14:27–38.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Wouwe JP, Lanting CI, van Dommelen P, Treffers PE, van Buuren S. Breastfeeding duration related to practised contraception in the Netherlands. Acta Paediatr 2009;98:86–90.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang LY, Liu YR, Shah IH, Tian KW, Zhang LH. Breastfeeding, amenorrhea and contraceptive practice among postpartum women in Zibo, China. Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care 2007;7:121–6.
   Google Scholar
• Wilson TE, Koenig L, Ickovics J, Walter E, Suss A, Fernandez MI, . Contraception use, family planning, and unprotected sex: Few differences among HIV-infected and uninfected postpartum women in four US states. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr 2003;33:608–13.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kosunen E, Sihvo S. Vakiintuneita tapoja ja uusia tuulia raskauden ehkäisyssä [Established ways and new trends in contraception]. Sihvo S, Koponen P. Perhesuunnittelusta lisääntymisterveyteen – palvelujen käyttö ja kehittämistarpeet [From family planning to reproductive health – use of healthcare services and need for their further development]. Saarijärvi: STAKES National Research and Development Centre for Welfare and Health; 1998. 21–32.
   Google Scholar
• Andersson K, Ryde-Blomqvist E, Lindell K, Odlind V, Milsom I. Perforations with intrauterine devices: Report from a Swedish survey. Contraception 1998;57:251–5.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caliskan E, Özturk N, Dilbaz BO, Dilbaz S. Analysis of risk factors associated with uterine perforation by intrauterine devices. Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care 2003;8:150–5.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mishell DR, Jr, Roy S. Copper intrauterine contraceptive device event rates following insertion 4 to 8 weeks post partum. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1982;143:29–35.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chi IC, Potts M, Wilkens LR, Champion CB. Performance of the copper T-380A intrauterine device in breastfeeding women. Contraception 1989;39:603–18.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewis PR, Brown JB, Renfree MB, Short RV. The resumption of ovulation and menstruation in a well-nourished population of women breastfeeding for an extended period of time. Fertil Steril 1991;55:529–36.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Truitt ST, Fraser AB, Grimes DA, Gallo MF, Schulz KF. Combined hormonal versus nonhormonal versus progestin-only contraception in lactation. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2003;2.
   Google Scholar
• Peterson AE, Perez-Escamilla R, Labboka MH, Hight V, von Hertzen H, Van Look P. Multicenter study of the lactational amenorrhea method (LAM) III: Effectiveness, duration, and satisfaction with reduced client–provider contact. Contraception 2000;62:221–30.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhou L, Xiao B. Emergency contraception with Multiload Cu-375 SL IUD: A multicenter clinical trial. Contraception 2001;64:107–12.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sannisto T, Mattila K, Kosunen E. Raskauden ehkäisyneuvonta terveyskeskuksissa [Contraceptive counselling at health centres]. English summary. Suom Lääkäril [Finnish Medical Journal] 2007;62:2185–92.
   Google Scholar
• Ministry of Social Affairs and Health. Seksuaali- ja lisääntymisterveyden edistäminen. Toimintaohjelma 2007–2011 [Promotion of sexual and reproductive health. Action programme 2007–2011]. English summary. Helsinki: Ministry of Social Affairs and Health; 2007. Available at: http://www.stm.fi/c/document_library/get_file?folderId=28707&name=DLFE–3584.pdf&
   Google Scholar
• Alanen SI, Johannala-Kemppainen R, Ijäs JJ, Kaila M, Klockars M, Mäkela M, . Evaluation of current care effectiveness: A survey of hypertension guideline implementation in Finnish health centres. Scand J Prim Health Care 2007;25:232–6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Midlov P, Ekesbo R, Johansson L, Gerward S, Persson K, Nerbrand C, . Barriers to adherence to hypertension guidelines among GPs in southern Sweden: A survey. Scand J Prim Health Care 2006;26:154–9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar