Reasons for ordering laboratory tests and relationship with frequency of abnormal results

References

• Vafiadis P. The dilemma of the unexpected result. Aust Fam Physician 1996;25:971–3.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Deyo RA. Cascade effects of medical technology. Annu Rev Public Health 2002;23:23–44. Epub 2001 Oct 25.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sherwood P, Lyburn I, Brown S, Ryder S. How are abnormal results for liver function tests dealt with in primary care? Audit of yield and impact. BMJ 2001;322:276–8.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Little P, Cantrell T, Roberts L, Chapman J, Langridge J, Pickering R. Why do GPs perform investigations? The medical and social agendas in arranging back X-rays. Fam Pract 1998;15:264–5.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aiarzaguena JM, Grandes G, Salazar A, Gaminde I, Sanchez A. The diagnostic challenges presented by patients with medically unexplained symptoms in general practice. Scand J Prim Health Care 2008;26:99–105.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van der Weijden T, van Bokhoven MA, Dinant GJ, van Hasselt CM, Grol RP. Understanding laboratory testing in diagnostic uncertainty: A qualitative study in general practice. Br J Gen Pract 2002;52:974–80.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Bokhoven MA, Pleunis-van Empel MC, Koch H, Grol RP, Dinant GJ, van der Weijden T. Why do patients want to have their blood tested? A qualitative study of patient expectations in general practice. BMC Fam Pract 2006;13:7–75.
   Google Scholar
• Van Boven K, Dijksterhuis P, Lamberts H. Defensive testing in Dutch family practice: Is the grass greener on the other side of the ocean? J Fam Pract 1997;44:468–72.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patt CH, Yoo HY, Dibadj K, Flynn J, Thuluvath PJ. Prevalence of transaminase abnormalities in asymptomatic, healthy subjects participating in an executive health-screening program. Dig Dis Sci 2003;48:797–801.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mold JW, Aspy CB, Lawler FH. Outcomes of an insurance company-sponsored multichannel chemistry screening initiative. J Fam Pract 1998;47:110–7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Phillips WR, Thompson DJ. Multi-channel laboratory testing and the unexpected abnormal result: A statistical myth corrected. N Z Med J 1981;94:462–4.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Houben PHH, van der Weijden T, van Bokhoven MA, Droog A, Winkens RA, Grol R. Overwegingen van huisartsen bij het interpreteren van laboratoriumonderzoek; een kwalitatief onderzoek [How general practitioners interpret laboratory test results; a qualitative interview study]. English summary. Huisarts Wet 2005;48:736–32.
   Google Scholar
• Brigden ML, Heathcote JC. Problems in interpreting laboratory tests: What do unexpected results mean? Postgrad Med 2000;107:145–6, 51–2, 55–8 passim.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hubbell FA, Frye EB, Akin BV, Rucker L. Routine admission laboratory testing for general medical patients. Med Care 1988;26:619–30.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rutten GEHM, De Grauw WJC, Nijpels G, Goudswaard AN, Uitewaal PJM, Van der Does FEE, . NHG-standaard Diabetes Mellitus type II. Huisarts Wet 2006;49:137–52.
   Google Scholar
• Leurquin P, Van Casteren V, De Maeseneer J. Use of blood tests in general practice: A collaborative study in eight European countries. Eurosentinel Study Group. Br J Gen Pract 1995;45:21–5.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Franzini C. Relevance of analytical and biological variations to quality and interpretation of test results: Examples of application to haematology. Ann Ist Super Sanita 1995;31:9–13.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• De Ruijter W, Assendelft WJ, Macfarlane PW, Westendorp RG, Gussekloo J. The additional value of routine electrocardiograms in cardiovascular risk management of older people. Scand J Prim Health Care 2008;26:147–53.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Wijk M, Mosseveld M, van der Lei J. Design of a decision support system for test ordering in general practice: Choices and decisions to make. Methods Inf Med 1999;38:355–61.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith BJ, McNeely MD. The influence of an expert system for test ordering and interpretation on laboratory investigations. Clin Chem 1999;45:1168–75.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bugter Maessen AM, Winkens RA, Grol RP, Knottnerus JA, Kester AD, Beusmans GH, . Factors predicting differences among general practitioners in test ordering behaviour and in the response to feedback on test requests. Fam Pract 1996;13:254–8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verstappen WH, van der Weijden T, Sijbrandij J, Smeele I, Hermsen J, Grimshaw J, . Effect of a practice-based strategy on test ordering performance of primary care physicians: A randomized trial. JAMA 2003;289:2407–12.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lyon AW, Greenway DC, Hindmarsh JT. A strategy to promote rational clinical chemistry test utilization. Am J Clin Pathol 1995;103:718–24.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Winkens RA, Pop P, Bugter Maessen AM, Grol RP, Kester AD, Beusmans GH, . Randomised controlled trial of routine individual feedback to improve rationality and reduce numbers of test requests. Lancet 1995;345:498–502.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Walraven C, Naylor CD. Do we know what inappropriate laboratory utilization is? A systematic review of laboratory clinical audits [see comments]. JAMA 1998;280:550–8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zaat JO, Schellevis FG, van Eijk JT, van der Velden K. Do out-of-office laboratory tests affect diagnoses in general practice? Scand J Prim Health Care 1995;13:46–51.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henny J. Interpretation of laboratory results: The reference values, a necessary evil?. Clin Chem Lab Med 2007;45:939–41.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Espeland A, Baerheim A. General practitioners’ views on radiology reports of plain radiography for back pain. Scand J Prim Health Care 2007;25:15–9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Puhan MA, Steurer J, Bachmann LM, ter Riet G. A randomized trial of ways to describe test accuracy: The effect on physicians’ post-test probability estimates. Ann Intern Med 2005;143:184–9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gigerenzer G, Hoffrage U. How to improve Bayesian reasoning without instruction: Frequency formats. Psychol Rev 1995;102:684–704.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reid MC, Lane DA, Feinstein AR. Academic calculations versus clinical judgments: Practicing physicians’ use of quantitative measures of test accuracy. Am J Med 1998;104:374–80.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar