Student-centred GP ambassadors: Perceptions of experienced clinical tutors in general practice undergraduate training

References

• Lauvås P, Handal G, Nilsson B. Handledning och praktisk yrkesteori [Supervision and theory of professional practice]. Lund: Studentlitteratur; 2001.
   Google Scholar
• Newble D, Cannon R. A handbook for medical teachers. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic; 2001.
   Google Scholar
• Newble DI, Entwistle NJ. Learning styles and approaches: Implications for medical education. Med Educ 1986;20: 162–75.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shacklady J, Holmes E, Mason G, Davies I, Dornan T. Maturity and medical students’ ease of transition into the clinical environment. Med Teach 2009;31:621–6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• General Medical Council. Tomorrow's doctors: Outcomes and standards for undergraduate medical education. London: General Medical Council; 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Haffling A-C. Medical students in general practice: Students’ learning experiences and perspectives from supervisors and patients. Malmö: Department of Clinical Science, Malmö, Lund University; 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Howie JG. Academic general practice: Reflections on a 60-year journey. Br J Gen Pract 2010;60:620–3.
   Google Scholar
• Rosenthal J, Stephenson A. General practice: The future teaching environment – a report on undergraduate primary care education in London. Br J Gen Pract 2010;60:144.
   Google Scholar
• Dornan T, Boshuizen H, King N, Scherpbier A. Experience-based learning: A model linking the processes and outcomes of medical students’ workplace learning. Med Educ 2007;41:84–91.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wooliscroft J. Medical student clinical education. In: Norman G, Van der Vleuten C, Newble D, editors. International handbook of research in medical education. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic; 2002. p 365–80.
   Google Scholar
• O’Sullivan M, Martin J, Murray E. Students’ perceptions of the relative advantages and disadvantages of community-based and hospital-based teaching: A qualitative study. Med Educ 2000;34:648–55.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thistlethwaite JE. Introducing community-based teaching of third year medical students: Outcomes of a pilot project one year later and implications for managing change. Educ Health (Abingdon) 2000;13:53–62.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Huggett KN, Warrier R, Maio A. Early learner perceptions of the attributes of effective preceptors. Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract 2008;13:649–58.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Leinster SJ. Workplace-based assessment as an educational tool: Guide supplement 31.2 – viewpoint. Med Teach 2009;31:1032.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Norcini J, Burch V. Workplace-based assessment as an educational tool: AMEE Guide No. 31. Med Teach 2007;29:855–71.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hartley S, Macfarlane F, Gantley M, Murray E. Influence on general practitioners of teaching undergraduates: Qualitative study of London general practitioner teachers. BMJ 1999; 319:1168–71.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Howe A. Teaching in practice: A qualitative factor analysis of community-based teaching. Med Educ 2000;34:762–8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Silén C, Kiessling A, Spaak J, Henriksson P. The experience of physician supervisors with clerkship students: A qualitative study. Int J Med Educ 2011;2:56–63.
   Google Scholar
• Von Below B, Hellquist G, Rödjer S, Gunnarsson R, Björkelund C, Wahlqvist M. Medical students’ and facilitators’ experiences of an Early Professional Contact course: Active and motivated students, strained facilitators. BMC Med Educ 2008;8:56. doi: 10.1186/1472-6920-8-56.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morgan DL, Bottorff JL. Advancing our craft: Focus group methods and practice. Qual Health Res 2010 ;20:579–81.
   Google Scholar
• Powell RA, Single HM. Focus groups. Int J Qual Health Care 1996;8:499–504.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graneheim UH, Lundman B. Qualitative content analysis in nursing research: Concepts, procedures and measures to achieve trustworthiness. Nurse Educ Today 2004; 24:105–12.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malterud K, Midenstrand M. Kvalitativa metoder i medicinsk forskning: en introduktion [Qualitative methods in medical research: an introduction]. Lund: Studentlitteratur; 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Von Below B, Rodjer S, Wahlqvist M, Billhult A. “I couldn't do this with opposition from my colleagues”: A qualitative study of physicians’ experiences as clinical tutors. BMC Med Educ 2011;11:79.
   Google Scholar
• Bunker J, Shadbolt N. Choosing general practice as a career: The influences of education and training. Aust Fam Physician 2009;38:341–4.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kiolbassa K, Miksch A, Hermann K, Loh A, Szecsenyi J, Joos S, et al. Becoming a general practitioner: Which factors have most impact on career choice of medical students? BMC Fam Pract 2011;12:25.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wesnes SL, Aasland O, Baerheim A. Career choice and place of graduation among physicians in Norway. Scand J Prim Health Care 2012;30:35–40.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mann KV, Holmes DB, Hayes VM, Burge FI, Viscount PW. Community family medicine teachers’ perceptions of their teaching role. Med Educ 2001;35:278–85.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Norcini J. The power of feedback. Med Educ 2010;44: 16–17.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kleizen K, Mattsson B. Motives and experiences of the competent supervisor in general practice: A qualitative study. Open Med Educ J 2010;3:18–22.
   Google Scholar