Between ideals and reality in home-based rehabilitation

References

• Wade DT. Describing rehabilitation interventions. Clin Rehabil 2005;19:811–818.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parker SG, Oliver P, Pennington M, et al. Rehabilitation of older patients: day hospital compared with rehabilitation at home. A randomised controlled trial. Health Technol Assess 2009;13:1–143.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fisher RJ, Gaynor C, Kerr M, et al. A consensus on stroke: early supported discharge. Stroke 2011;42:1392–97. Published online 24 March 2011. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.110.606285
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lincoln NB, Walker MF, Dixon A, Knights P. Evaluation of a multiprofessional community stroke team: a randomized controlled trial. Clin Rehabil 2004;18:40–7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gage H, Storey L. Rehabilitation for Parkinsons’s disease: A systematic review of available evidence. Clin Rehabil 2004;18:463–482.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dawes H, Korpershoek N, Freebody J, et al. A pilot randomised controlled trial of a home-based exercise programme aimed at improving endurance and function in adults with neuromuscular disorders. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2006;77:959–962.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graff MJL, Vernooij-Dassen MJM, Thijssen M, et al. Community based occupational therapy for patients with dementia and their caregivers: Randomised controlled trial. BMJ 2006;333: 1196.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stolee P, Lim SN, Wilson L, Glenny C. Inpatient versus home-based rehabilitation for older adults with musculoskeletal disorders: a systematic review. Clin Rehabil 2012;26:387–402.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rytter L, Jakobsen HN, Rønholt F, et al. Comprehensive discharge follow-up in patients’ homes by GPs and district nurses of elderly patients: A randomized controlled trial. Scand J Prim Health Care 2010;28:146–153.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vabø M. Organisering for velferd. Hjemmetjenesten i en styringsideologisk brytningstid [Organisation for welfare. Home-based services in times of transition for public management ideology]. PhD thesis, Faculty of Social Science, University of Oslo; 2007 [in Norwegian].
   Google Scholar
• Vabø M. Norwegian home care in transition: heading for accountability, offloading responsibilities. Health Soc Care Community 2012;20:283–91. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2524.2012.01058.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rostgaard T. Quality reforms in Danish home care: Balancing between standardisation and individualisation. Health Soc Care Community 2012;20:247–254.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Szebehely M, Trydegård G-B. Home care for older people in Sweden: a universal model in transition. Health Soc Care Community 2012;20:300–309.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tynkkynen LK, Keskimäki I, Lehto J. Purchaser–provider splits in health care: The case of Finland. Health Policy 2013;11:221–225.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Norwegian Ministry of Health and Care Services. LOV 2011-06-24 no. 30: Lov om kommunale helse- og omsorgstjenester m.m. [Municipal Health and Care Services Act] [in Norwegian].
   Google Scholar
• Norwegian Ministry of Health and Care Services. FOR 2011-12-16 no 1256: Forskrift om habilitering og rehabilitering, individuell plan og koordinator [Regulation relating to habilitation and rehabilitation, individual plan and coordinator] [in Norwegian].
   Google Scholar
• Norwegian Ministry of Health and Care Services. LOV 1999-07-02 no. 63: Lov om pasient – og brukerrettigheter [Patient and User Rights Act]. Entry into force 2001, most recently amended LOV 2011-06-24-30 [in Norwegian].
   Google Scholar
• Norwegian Ministry of Health and Care Services. FOR 2010-11-12 no. 1426: Forskrift om en verdig eldreomsorg (Verdighetsgarantien) [Regulation relating to elderly care with dignity (The dignity guarantee)] [in Norwegian].
   Google Scholar
• Steihaug S, Lippestad J-W, Isaksen H, Werner A. Development of a model for organisation of and cooperation on home-based rehabilitation: an action research project. Disabil Rehabil 2014;36:608–16.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bate P. Synthesizing research and practice: Using the action research approach in health care settings. Social Policy & Administration 2000;34:478–493.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malterud K. Systematic text condensation: a strategy for qualitative analysis. Scand J Public Health 2012;40: 795–805.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Office of the Auditor General of Norway (Riksrevisjonen). Riksrevisjonens undersøkelse om rehabilitering innen helsetjenesten [Office of the Auditor General of Norway’s study of rehabilitation in the healthcare services]. Document 3:11 (2011–2012) [in Norwegian].
   Google Scholar
• Kendall E, Buys N, Larner J. Community-based service delivery in rehabilitation: the promise and the paradox. Disabil Rehabil 2000;22:435–445.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Randström KB, Asplund K, Svedlund M, Paulson M. Activity and participation in home rehabilitation: older people’s and family members’ perspectives. J Rehabil Med 2013;45: 211–216.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wade DT. Diagnoses in rehabilitation: Woolly thinking and resource inequity. Clin Rehabil 2002;16:347–349.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vetlesen AJ. Omsorg – mellom avhengighet og autonomi [Caring – between dependence and autonomy]. In: Ruyter KW, Vetlesen AJ, editors. Omsorgens tvetydighet – egenart, historie og praksis [The ambiguity of caring – distinctive character, history and practice] [in Norwegian]. Oslo: Gyldendal Akademinsk; 2001. p 27–40.
   Google Scholar
• Hamberg K, Johansson E, Lindgren G, Westman G. Scientific rigour in qualitative research: examples from a study of women’s health in family practice. Fam Pract 1994;11:176–181.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meyer JE. New paradigm research in practice: the trials and tribulations of action research. J Adv Nurs 1993;18: 1066–1072.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bakken R, Brinchmann A, Haukelien H, Kroken R. Velferdsstaten som mysterium. I: Maktens samvittighet. Om politikk, styring og dilemmaer i velferdsstaten [The welfare state as a mystery. In: The conscience of power. About politics, governance and dilemmas in the welfare state] [in Norwegian]. Oslo: Gyldendal Norsk Forlag AS; 2002. p 10–20.
   Google Scholar
• Wollscheid S, Eriksen J, Hallvik J. Undermining the rules in home care services for the elderly in Norway: flexibility and cooperation. Scand J Caring Sci 2013;27:414–421.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar