On Content of Practice

References

• Gore A. Infrastructure for the global village. Sci Am 1992; 265: 150–3
   Google Scholar
• LaPorte R E. Global public health and the information superhighway. Tomorrow the world. BMJ 1994; 308: 1651–2
   Google Scholar
• Sigurdsson G, Magnusson G, Sigvaldason H, Tulinius H, Einarsson I, Olafsson O. Problemorienterad journal och individbaserat informationssystem för primärvården (The Egilsstadir-project. Problem-oriented medical-record and individual based information system for primary care). NOMESCO, Stockholm 1979, (In Swedish with English summary)
   Google Scholar
• Njalsson T. Skraning og vinnsla samskipta á heilsugaælustftöinni a Hólmavik 1. júlí 1985 til 30. júní 1986. (Computerized problem-oriented medical record. One year experience and results in an Icelandic rural practice). Icelandic Med J 1988; 74: 257–63, (In Icelandic with English summary)
   Google Scholar
• Njalsson T. Samanburdur skráninga samskipta á fimm heilsugæslustödvum. (Consultations in family practice. Five community health centres in Iceland 1965–1986). Icelandic Med J 1988; 74: 319–24, (In Icelandic with English summary)
   Google Scholar
• Valdimarsson H, Stefansson J, Agnarsdöttir G. Læknisstörf i héraoi. (The tasks of the rural physician). Icelandic Med J 1969; 55: 15–35
   Google Scholar
• Onundarson B. Drag ad könnun a störfum 9 heimilislækna í Reykjavík (Outlines of nine GPs practices in Reykjavik). Icelandic Med J 1974; 60: 57–72, (In Icelandic)
   Google Scholar
• Sigvaldason H, Einarsson I, Bjomsson O, Olafsson O, Sigfusson S, Klemenzdottir T. Könnun á læknispjónustu á landsbyggòinni 16-22. September 1974. A study of medical services in rural Iceland, September 16–22 1974. Report on Public Health in Iceland 1974, suppl, Surgeon General of Iceland. 1978, (In Icelandic with English summary)
   Google Scholar
• Magnusson G, Sveinsson O. Könnun á heilbrigòisbjónustu í Skagafiròi. Survey of Health services in the Skagafjordur district. Icelandic Med J 1976; 62: 167–79, (In Icelandic with English summary)
   Google Scholar
• Petursson P. Heilsugæsla í Bolungarvík; afrakstur samskiptaskráningar 1983–1986. (Primary care in the town of Bolungarvik; computerized medical records 1983–1986). Public Health Reports 1988, Suppl 5, Surgeon General, Reykjavik 1988
   Google Scholar
• Magnusson G, Einarsson I, Olafsson O. A survey of primary health services in rural Iceland. Scand J Prim Health Care 1988; 6: 77–85
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Last J M. The Iceberg. “Completing the clinical picture” in general practice. Lancet 1963; ii: 28–31
   Google Scholar
• Sigurdsson J A. Demography and organization of health system. General practitioner education. UK and the Nordic perspectives, M Lawrence, Pritchard. Springer-Verlag, London 1992; 117–21
   Google Scholar
• Nordic Medical-Statistical Committee. Health statistics in the Nordic Counties 1966–1991. NOMESCO, Copenhagen 1991
   Google Scholar
• The Statistical Bureau of Iceland. Statistical News 1989; 74: 178–200
   Google Scholar
• ICHPPC-2-Defined (International Classification of Health Problems in Primary Care). Oxford University Press, Oxford 1983
   Google Scholar
• Minitab, statistical software. DOS Microcomputer Version, release 7–2. Minitab Inc., USA 1990, State College, PA 16801
   Google Scholar
• Diwan V K, Eriksson B, Sterky G, Tomson G. Randomization by group in studying the effect of drug information in primary care. Int J. Epidemiol 1992; 21: 124–30
   Google Scholar
• Royal College of General Practitioners. Office of Population Census and Surveys. Department of Health and Social Security. Morbidity Statistics from General Practice. Second National Study 1970–71. Studies on Medical and Population Subjects No. 26. HSMO, London 1974
   Google Scholar
• Royal College of General Practitioners. Office of Population Census and Surveys. Department of Health and Social Security. Morbidity Statistics from General Practice 1981–82. Third national study. HSMO, London 1986
   Google Scholar
• Billsborough J S. Do patients consult the doctor less often than they used to. J R Coll Gen Pract 1981; 31: 99–104
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Logan W PD. Morbidity statistics from general practice. Practitioner 1954; 173: 188–94
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Richardson I M, Howie J GR, Durno D, Gill G, Dingwall-Fordyce I. A study of general-practitioner consultations in North-East Scotland. J R Coll Gen Pract 1973; 23: 132–42
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• MacDonald A, McLean I G. Study of the work of general practitioner. Practitioner 1971; 207: 680–8
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Livingstone A E, Jewell J A, Robson J. Twenty-four hour care in inner cities: Two years out of hours workload in east London general practice. BMJ 1989; 299: 368–70
   Google Scholar
• Gillam S J, Jarman B, Law R. Ethnic differences in consultation rates in urban general practice. BMJ 1989; 299: 953–7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knight R. The importance of list size and consultation length as factors in general practice. J R Coll Gen. Pract 1987; 37: 19–22
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Williams W O. A study of general practitioners' work load in South Wales 1965–1966 (A survey by 68 doctors). J R Coll Gen Pract 1970; 1–19, Reports from general practice XII
   Google Scholar
• Wilton J. A review of general practice reports: the need for standardization. BMJ 1990; 300: 851–3
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Nylenna M. Why do our patients see us. Scand J Prim Health Care 1985; 3: 155–62
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Dickie M B, Newell J P, Bass M J. An information system for family practice. Part 4: Contact data and their uses. J Fam Pract 1976; 3: 633–6
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hollnagel H, Heldrup J, Frimodt-Moller B, Gannik D, Pedersen P A. Diagnostik og behandling i almen praksis, 2. Kontaktforlob af helbredsproblemer over 3 måneder. (Diagnosis and treatment in general practice. 2. Episodes of medical care of health problems during period of 3 months). Ugeskr. Læger 1989; 151: 148–52
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Fry J. Five Years of General Practice. A study in simple epidemiology. BMJ 1957; 2: 1453–7
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Fry J, Dillane J B. Workload in general practice 1950–85. J R Coll Gen Pract 1986; 36: 403–4
   Google Scholar
• Lamberts H, Meads S, Wood M. Waarom gaat iemand naar de huisarts? Why do we visit the general practitioner). Huisartsen en Wetschap 1984; 27: 234–44, (in Dutch)
   Google Scholar
• Robertson D L. Symptoms contacted during a three year family practice residency. J Fam Pract 1981; 13: 239–44
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frimodt-Moller B, Gannik D, Heldrup J, Hollnagel H, Pedersen P A. Diagnostik og behandling i almen praksis, 3. Kontaktårsager og diagnoser ved kontaktforlob i almen praksis. (Diagnosis and treatment in general practice. 3. Reasons for contacts and diagnoses of contacts in general practice). Ugeskr. Læger 1989; 151: 152–7
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Rose G, Barker D JP, Coggon D. Understanding epidemiology. Measures of disease frequency. BMJ 1993; 307: 1470
   Google Scholar
• Schneeweiss R, Cherkin D C, Hart G L. The effect of including secondary diagnoses on the description of the diagnostic content of family practice. Med. Care 1984; 22: 1058–63
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Last J M, White K L. The content of medical care in primary practice. Med Care 1969; 7: 41–8
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Brown J W, Robertson L S, Kosa J, Alpert J J. A study of general practice in Massachusetts. JAMA 1971; 216: 301–6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilkin D, Metcalf D HM, Hallam L, Cooke M, Hodgkin P K. Area variations in the process of care in urban general practice. BMJ 1984; 289: 229–32
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Swartling P G, Kebbon L, Smedby B. Mental health problems in primary health care as seen by doctors. Scand J Prim Health Care 1987; 5: 201–4
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Goldberg D P, Blackwell B. Psychiatric illness in general practice. A detailed study using a new method of case identification. BMJ 1970; 2: 439–43
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marsland D W, Wood M, Mayo F. Content of family practice. Part I: Rank order of diagnoses by frequency. Part II: Diagnoses by disease category and age/sex distribution. J Fam Pract 1976; 3: 37–68
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kirkwood C R, Clure H R, Brodsky R, et al. The diagnostic content of family practice: 50 most common diagnoses recorded in the WAMI community practices. J Fam. Pract 1982; 15: 485–92
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Rosenblatt R A, Cherkin D C, Schneeweiss R, Hart L G, Greenwald H, Kirkwood R, Perkoff G. The structure and content of family practice: Current status and future trends. J Fam Pract 1982; 15: 681–722
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Stewart L C, Gehringer G R, Byars V G. Patient problems in the office practice of six family physicians in Louisiana. J Fam Pract 1977; 5: 103–7
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• IC-Process-PC (International Classification of Process in Primary Care). Oxford medical publications, Oxford 1986
   Google Scholar
• Dixon T. Urinary tract infections. Management mayhem? (Editorial). Can Fam Physician 1993; 39: 474–6
   Google Scholar
• Wennberg J E. The paradox of appropriate care. JAMA 1987; 258: 2568–9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wennberg J E. Outcomes research, patient preference, and the primary care physician. J Am Board Fam Pract 1991; 4: 36–7
   Google Scholar
• Njalsson T, Sigurdsson J A, Sverrisson G I, Brekkan A. X-rays in family practice. An Icelandic multicentre study. Family Practice 1995; 12: 143–8
   Google Scholar
• Njalsson T, Sigurdsson J A. On prescription items in family practice. A multicentre study on one year of prescribing, Submitted
   Google Scholar
• Njalsson T, McAuley R G. On content of practice. An Icelandic multicentre study, populations, practices and contacts. Scand J Prim Health Care 1992; 10: 243–9
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Barton E, Gallagher S, Rower C DR, Hanka R, King R H, Sherwood T. Influence on patient management of general practitioner direct access to radiological services. Brit J of Radiology 1987; 60: 893–6
   Google Scholar
• Sigurdsson J A, Oddsson A, Magnusson G, Jonsson H, Blondal T. Ávísanir á lyf I. Könnun ä lyfjaávísunum lækna utan sjúkrahúsa á Sudumesjum og í Hafharfiroi 1–15. apríl 1986. (Prescriptions I. Audit of prescriptions outside hospitals in Iceland.). Icelandic Med J 1989; 75: 63–8, (In Icelandic with English summary)
   Google Scholar
• Brekkan A, Holm T. Diagnostisk radiologi inom primärvården (Diagnostic radiology in primary health care). Radiologin i Norden Spri rapport 275:2. Spri, Stockholm 1990; 122–35
   Google Scholar
• Georgsson G. Röntgenundersögelser i Island i 1987, (Radiology examinations in Iceland 1987). Radiologin i Norden Spri rapport 275:2. Spri, Stockholm 1990; 60–8
   Google Scholar
• Brekkan A. Needs of X-ray services at primary health care level. Nord Med 1981; 96: 204–6
   Google Scholar
• Njalsson T, McAuley R G. Reasons for contacts in family practice. An Icelandic multicentre study on content of practice. Scand J Prim Health Care 1992; 10: 250–6
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Njalsson T, Sigurdsson J A, McAuley R G. Health problems in family practice. An Icelandic multicentre study. Scand J Prim Health Care 1995, in press
   Google Scholar
• Njalsson T, Sigurdsson J A. Doctors, computers and the quality of registration. Audit of prescriptions and x-ray requests. Eur J Gen Practice 1995; 1: 59–62
   Google Scholar
• Njalsson T, Sigurdsson J A. On process of care. An Icelandic multicentre study in family practice, Submitted
   Google Scholar
• van de Lisdonk E. Perceived and presented morbidity in general practice. A study with diaries in 4 general practices in The Netherlands. Scand J Prim Healthcare 1989; 7: 73–8
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Becker L A, Iverson D C, Reed F M, Calonge B N, Miller R S, Freeman W L. A study of headache in North American primary care: a report from ASPN. J R Coll Gen Pract 1987; 37: 400–3
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Rosser W, Henderson R, Wood M, Green L A. An exploratory report of chest pain in primary care. A report from ASPN. J Am Board Fam Pract 1990; 3: 143–50
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Houghton G. Audit in general practice (letter). BMJ 1991; 302: 660
   Google Scholar
• Webb S J, Dowell A C, Heywood P. Survey of general practice audit in Leeds. BMJ 1991; 302: 390–2
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hurwitz B. Out of hours. Primary care needs a properly funded, well organized night time service (editorial). BMJ 1994; 309: 1593–4
   Google Scholar
• Hallam L, Cragg D. Organization of primary care services outside normal working hours. BMJ 1994; 309: 1621–3
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Oleson F, Jolleys J V. Out of hours service: the Danish solution examined. BMJ 1994; 309: 1624–6
   Google Scholar
• Krogh-Jensen P. The denominator problem. Scand J Prim Health Care 1983; 1: 53
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Rafhsson V, Steingrímsdóttir Ó A, Ólafsson M H, Sveinsdóttir T. Muskuloskeletaila besvär bland Islänningar. Månadens artikel. (Musculoskeletal problems among Icelanders). Nordisk Medicin 1989; 104: 104–7
   Google Scholar
• Lamberts H, Brouwer H J, Marinus A FM, Hofmans-Okkes I M. The use of ICPC in the transition project. Episode-oriented epidemiology in general practice. The international classification of primary care in the European community, H Lamberts, M Wood, I Hofmans-Okkes. Oxford University Press. 1993; 45–61
   Google Scholar
• Carney T. Workload of general practitioners. BMJ 1989; 299: 753–4
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Chassin M R. Explaining geographic variations: the enthusiasm hypothesis. Med Care 1993; 31((suppl))YS37–44
   Google Scholar
• Chassin M R, Kosecoff J, Park R E, Winslow M, Kahn K L, Merrick N J, et al. Does inappropriate use explain geographic variation in the use of health care services? A study of three procedures. JAMA 1987; 258: 2533–7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hofmans-Okkes I. Hoe lang duurt een goed consult? 2. Een onderzoek naar de relatie tussen lengte en kwalitelt van 200 huisartconsulten. (How long does a good consultation last? 2. A study of the relationship between length and quality in 200 consultations in general practice). Huisarts en Wetenschap 1991; 34: 14–20, (In Dutch with English summary)
   Google Scholar
• Bentsen B G. The accuracy of recording patient problems in family practice. J Med Educ 1976; 51: 311–6
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• McKee M, Clarke A. Guidelines, enthusiasms, uncertainty, and the limits to purchasing. BMJ 1995; 310: 101–4
   Google Scholar
• Berner E S, Webster G D, Shugerman A A, Jackson J R, Algina J, Baker A L, et al. Performance of four computer-based diagnostic systems. N Eng J Med 1994; 330: 1792–6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kassirer J P. A report card on the computer-assisted diagnosis the grade C. N Eng J Med 1994; 330: 1824–5
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Brennan P, Croft P. Interpreting the results of observational research: chance is not such a fine thing. BMJ 1994; 309: 727–30
   Google Scholar
• Jick H, Jick S S, Derby L E. Validation of information recorded on general practitioner based computerized data resource in the United Kingdom. BMJ 1991; 302: 766–8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van der Lei J, Duisterhout J S, Westerhof H P, van der Does E, Cromme P VM, Boon W MMS, van Bemmel J H. The introduction of computer-based patient records in the Netherlands. Ann Int Med 1993; 119: 1036–41
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hicks N R. Some observations on attempts to measure appropriateness of care. BMJ 1994; 309: 730–3
   Google Scholar
• Brook R H. Appropriateness: the next frontier. BMJ 1994; 308: 218–9
   Google Scholar
• Winslow C M, Kosecoff J, Chassin M R, Kanouse D E, Brook R H. The appropriateness of performing coronary artery bypass surgery. JAMA 1988; 260: 505–9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Judge K. Beyond health care. Attention should be directed at the social determents of ill health. BMJ 1994; 309: 1454–5, (editorial)
   Google Scholar
• Tape T G, Campbell J R. Computerized medical records and preventive health care: success depends on many factors. Am J Med 1993; 94((6))619–25
   Google Scholar
• Ornstein S M, Garr D R, Jenkins R G. A comprehensive microcomputer-based medical records system with sophisticated preventive services features for the family physician. J Am Board Fam. Pract 1993; 6: 55–60
   Google Scholar
• Bamett G O, Jenders R A, Chueh H C. The computer-based clinical record -where do we stand? (editorial). Ann Intern Med 1993; 119: 1046–8
   Google Scholar
• Gilliland A, Mills K A, Steele K. General practitioner records on computer-handle with care. Fam Pract 1992; 9: 441–50
   Google Scholar
• Ornstein S, Bearden A. Patient perspectives on computer-based medical records. J Fam Pract 1994; 38((6))606–10
   Google Scholar
• Legler J D, Oates R. Patients' reactions to physician use of a computerized medical record system during clinical encounters. J Fam. Pract 1993; 37: 241–4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosser W W, Beaulieu M. Institutional objectives for medical education that relates to the community. Can Med Assoc J 1984; 130: 683–9
   Google Scholar
• Pritchard P. Workshop on computerized decision support in primary care. North Thames Regional Health Authority. 1994
   Google Scholar
• McWhinney I R. A textbook of family medicine. Oxford University Press, New York 1989
   Google Scholar
• Lawrence M, Coulter A. Jones A total audit of preventive procedures in 45 practices caring for 430,000. BMJ 1990; 300: 1501–3
   Google Scholar
• Shanks J, Kheraj S, Fish S. Better ways of assessing health needs in primary care. BMJ 1995; 310: 480–1
   PubMedGoogle Scholar