Addition of Local Anesthetics to Contrast Media

References

• Almén T. Contrast agent design. Some aspects of the syn thesis of water soluble contrast agents of low osmolality. J. Theoret. Biol 1969; 24: 216
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Almén T. Experimental investigations with iohexol and their clinical relevance. Acta Radiol 1983, Suppl. No. 366: 9
   Google Scholar
• Almén T., Boijsen E., Linell S. E. Metrizamide in angiography. Acta Radiol. Diagnosis 1977; 18: 33
   Google Scholar
• Amiel M., Barbe R., Duc R. Effect of methylglucamine salts of iocarmic and iothalamic acids on hemodynamics, acid-base equilibrium and coagulation. Acta Radiol. Diagnosis 1977; 18: 602
   Google Scholar
• Amundsen P. Double-blind test in a comparison of angiographic contrast media for intravascular use. Acta Radiol. Diagnosis 1965; 3: 335
   Google Scholar
• Björk L., Erikson U., Ingelman B. Clinical experiences with a new type of contrast medium in peripheral arteriography. Amer. J. Roentgenol 1969; 106: 418
   Google Scholar
• Brooks B. Intra-arterial injection of sodium iodide. J. Amer. Med. Ass 1924; 82: 1016
   Google Scholar
• Curry J. L., Howland W. J. Arteriography. Principles and techniques. Saunders, Philadelphia 1966
   Google Scholar
• De Jong R. Local anesthetics. Second edition. Charles C. Thomas, Springfield, Illinois 1977
   Google Scholar
• Dempsey P. J., Goree J. A., Jimenez J. P., McCord G. M., Jr. The effect of contrast media on patient motion during cerebral angiography. Radiology 1975; 115: 207
   Google Scholar
• Eisenberg R. L., Mani R. L., Hedgcock M. W. Pain associated with peripheral angiography. Is lidocaine effective?. Radiology 1978; 127: 109
   Google Scholar
• Esgaard H., Hoerup A., Praestholm J. A controlled clinical trial of iohexol and diatrizoate in aortofemoral angiography. Europ. J. Radiol 1983; 3: 14
   Google Scholar
• Fletcher E. W. A comparison of iopamidol and diatrizoate in peripheral angiography. Brit. J. Radiol 1982; 55: 36
   Google Scholar
• Goodwin W. E., Walter R. C. Intra-aortic procaine injection in aortography. Angiology 1953; 4: 410
   Google Scholar
• Gordon I. J., Westcott J. L. Intraarterial lidocaine An effective analgesic for peripheral angiography. Radiology 1977; 124: 43
   Google Scholar
• Gordon I. J., Guthaner P. F., Sllverman J. F., Hayden W. G., Wexler L. Intraarterial analgesia in peripheral arteriography. Amer. J. Roentgenol 1977; 128: 737
   Google Scholar
• Hagen B., Clauss W. Kontrastmittel und Schmerz bei der peripheren Arteriographie. Ioglicinat, Ioglicinat-Lidocain, Ioxaglat. Radiologe 1982; 22: 470
   Google Scholar
• Hagen B., Klink G. Contrast media and pain. Hypothesis on the genesis of pain occurring on intra-arterial administration of contrast media. Contrast media in urography, angiography and computerized tomography, V. Taenzer, E. Zeitler. Georg Thieme Verlag, Stuttgart 1983; 50
   Google Scholar
• Heystaten F. M., Van De Berg F. G., Mulderije E. D. Comparison of pain and heat sensation of contrast media in aortofemoral angiography. Meglumine-amidotrizoate (Angiografin) mixed with lidocaine versus sodium-meglumine Ioxaglate (Hexabrix). Diagn. Imaging 1983; 52: 141
   Google Scholar
• Hilal S. K. Hemodynamic changes associated with the intraarterial injection of contrast media. Radiology 1966; 86: 615
   Google Scholar
• Holder J. C., Dalrymple G. V. Pain and aortofemoral arteriography. Importance of chemical structure and osmolallity of contrast agents. Invest. Radiol 1981; 16: 508
   Google Scholar
• Holm M., Praestholm J. Ioxaglate, a new low osmolar contrast medium used in femoral angiography. Brit. J. Ra diol 1979; 52: 169
   Google Scholar
• Lanz E., Gunther R. Periphere Arteriographien unter intraarterieller Lokalanaesthesie. Anaesthesist 1978; 27: 325
   Google Scholar
• Marshall M., Hendersson G. A. Tendency to acidosis following the injection of radio-opaque contrast material. Brit. J. Radiol 1968; 41: 190
   Google Scholar
• Meves M., Hutwohl B., Kraska H. Die Anwendung von Metrizamid bei der peripheren Angiographie. Eine vergleichende Untersuchung. Fortschr. Röntgenstr 1978; 128: 339
   Google Scholar
• Nilsson P. E., Aspelin P., Elmquist D. Aortocervical angiography with high and low ionic osmolality contrast media. A clinical investigaton of metrizoate and ioxaglate. Acta Radiol. Diagnosis 1985; 26: 731
   Google Scholar
• Nyman U., Nilsson P., Westergren A. Pain and hemodynamic effects in aortofemoral angiography. Clinical comparison of iohexol, ioxaglate and metrizamide. Acta Radiol. Diagnosis 1982; 23: 389
   Google Scholar
• Padayachee T. S., Reidy J. F., King D. H., Reeves M., Gosling R. G. Femoral artery flow and pain during lumbar aortography. Comparison of ionic and non-ionic contrast media. Clin. Radiol 1983; 34: 79
   Google Scholar
• Sacks B. A., Ellison H. P., Bartek S., Vine H. S., Palestrant A. M. A comparison of Hexabrix and Renografin 60 in peripheral arteriography. Amer. J. Roentgenol 1983; 140: 975
   Google Scholar
• Schmidt K. R., Pfeifer K. J. Effektivität von intraartreriellem Lidocain in der Schmerzbekämpfung bei Arm- und Beinarteriographien. Munch. Med. Wschr 1980; 122: 1159
   Google Scholar
• Schmidt K. R., Huber R., Welter H. Schmerzreduktion bei peri-pheren Arteriographien der oberen und unteren Extremit/auml;t im Doppelblind Versuch. Lidocain/Ioglicinat gegen Metrizamid. Röntgen-Bl 1980; 33: 571
   Google Scholar
• Schmitt H. E., Da Silva A. Zum Schmerzproblem bei der peripheren Arteriographie. Vasa 1979; 8: 295
   Google Scholar
• Speck U., Siefert H. M., Klink G. Contrast media in peripheral arteriography. Invest. Radiol 1980; 15: S351
   Google Scholar
• Spigos D. G., Akkinemi S., Tan W., Espinoza G., Flanigan D. P., Winnie A. Epidural anesthesia. Effective analgesia in aortoiliofemoral arteriography. Amer. J. Roentgenol 1980; 134: 335
   Google Scholar
• Steiner R. M., Grainger R. G., Memon N., Wiess D., Kanofsky P. B., Menduke H. The effect of contrast media of low osmolality on the peripheral arterial blood flow in the dog. Clin. Radiol 1950; 31: 621
   Google Scholar
• Straub H., Wiebe V. Verminderung von Nebenwirkungen bei der Beckenbeinangiographie. Niederosmolares Kontrastmittel im Vergleich mit konventionellem Kontrastmittel plus Lokalanästheticum. Röntgen-Bl 1981; 34: 139
   Google Scholar
• Tillmann U. R., Adler W., Fuchs W. A. Pain in peripheral arteriography. A comparison of a low osmolality contrast medium with a conventional compound. Brit. J. Radiol 1979; 52: 102
   Google Scholar
• Van Waes P. F. New low osmolality water-soluble contrast compounds in selective arteriography of the peripheral limbs. Diagn. Imaging 1979; 18: 209
   Google Scholar
• Wenz W., Wiemas K., Schumann D., Reinbold W.-D., Anger P. Anaesthesia problem in angiography with special references to modern contrast media. Contrast media in urography, angiography and computerized tomography, V. Taenzer, E. Zeitler. Georg Thieme Verlag, Stuttgart 1983; 92
   Google Scholar
• Widrich W. C., Robbins A. H., Goldstein S. A., Singer R. J. Adjuvant intra-arterial lidocaine in aortofemoral arteriography. Some further observations. Radiology 1978; 129: 371
   Google Scholar
• Widrich W. C., Singer R. J., Robbins A. H. The use of intra-arterial lidocaine to control pain due to aortofemoral arteriography. Radiology 1977; 124: 37
   Google Scholar
• Wiebe V., Straub H. Haemodynamic side effects of meglumine ioglicate, meglumine sodium ioxaglate and iohexol in aortofemoral angiography. Contrast media in urography, angiography and computerized tomography, V. Taenzer, E. Zeitler. Georg Thieme Verlag, Stuttgart 1983; 78
   Google Scholar
• Zachrisson B.-F., Johansson R., Björk L. Two new contrast media in peripheral arteriography. A double blind study in patients with arterial insufficiency in the legs. Fortschr. Röntgenstr 1980; 132: 208
   Google Scholar