The Organization of Clinical Dosimetry. II Some special topics in treatment planning

References

• Adams G. D., Meurk M. L. The use of a computer to calculate isodose information surrounding distributed gynaecological radium sources. Phys. Med. Biol. 1964; 9: 533
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alderson Rando System. Radiotherapy Analog Dosimetry. Technical Bulletin No. 35, Alderson Research Labs. Inc., New York 1961
   Google Scholar
• Alderson S. W., Lanzl L. H., Rollins M., Spira J. An instrumented phantom system for analog computation of treatment plans. Amer. J. Roentgenol. 1962; 87: 185
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Batho H. F., Young M. E. J. Tissue absorption corrections for linear radium sources. Brit. J. Radiol. 1964; 37: 689
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bentley R. E. Digital computers in radiation treatment planning. Brit. J. Radiol. 1964; 37: 748
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braestrup C. B., Mooney R. T. Physical aspects of rotating telecobalt equipment. Radiology 1955; 64: 17
   Google Scholar
• Brasfield R. D., Henschke U. K. Intravascular irradiation of the internal mammary lymph nodes in breast cancer. Amer. J. Roentgenol. 1961; 85: 849
   Google Scholar
• Cameron J. R., Zimmerman D., Kenney G., et al. Thermoluminescent radiation dosimetry utilizing LiF. Health Phys. 1964; 10: 25
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Campbell E. M., Than Tun. Isodose charts for obliquely incident Co-60 teletherapy beams. Radiology 1964; 83: 1073
   Google Scholar
• Castro V., Soifer C., Quimby E. H. Calculation of dosage in vertical rotation therapy using standard isodose charts. Amer. J. Roentgenol. 1955; 73: 815
   Google Scholar
• Cavina C., Dalla Palma L., Giannardi G. F., Renzi R. I filtri a cuneo in telecobaltoterapia: rilievi dosimetrici e aspetti clinici. Nuntius Radiol. 1962; 28: 341
   Google Scholar
• Chassagne D., Raynal M., Pierquin B. Technique d'endocuriethérapie par iridium 192 avec tubes plastiques dans les tumeurs mammaires. J. Radiol. électrol. 1963; 44: 269
   Google Scholar
• Clinical Dosimetry. Icrum Rep. 10 d. NBS Handbook 87, Washington 1963
   Google Scholar
• Code Of Practice For X-Ray Measurements. Brit. J. Radiol. 1960; 33: 55
   Google Scholar
• Code Of Practice For Megavoltage Dosimetry. Phys. Med. Biol. 1964; 9: 457
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen M. The unit of X-ray dose and its realization: II. The patient and the roentgen. Brit. J. Radiol. 1955; 28: 669
   Google Scholar
• Cohen M. Physical aspects of roentgen therapy using wedge filters. I. Some new copper wedges and their applications. Acta radiol. 1959; 52: 65, (a)
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen M. Physical aspects of roentgen therapy using wedge filters. II. Analysis of wedge field dosimetry. Acta radiol. 1959; 52: 158, (b)
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen M. An atlas of radiation dose distributions. Multiple-field isodose charts. IAEA, Vienna 1965; Vol. II
   Google Scholar
• Cohen M. Organization of clinical dosimetry. I. The four stages of clinical dosimetry. Acta radiol. Ther. Phys. Biol. 1966; 4: 233
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen M., Burns J. E., Sear R. Physical aspects of cobalt-60 teletherapy using wedge filters. I. Physical investigations. Acta radiol. 1960; 53: 401, (a)
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Cohen M., Burns J. E., Sear R. Physical aspects of cobalt-60 teletherapy using wedge filters. II. Dosimetric considerations. Acta radiol. 1960; 53: 486, (a)(b)
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crosby E. H., Shalek R. J., Boone M. L. M. The use of lithium fluoride dosimeters for in-vivo measurement of transmission through bone and lung. Paper read at the International Conference on Luminescence Dosimetry. June, 1965. Stanford University, USA
   Google Scholar
• Dahl O., Vikterlöf K. J. Dose distributions in arc therapy in the 200 to 250 kV range. Acta radiol. 1958, Suppl. No. 171
   Google Scholar
• Dahl O., Vikterlöf K. J. Attainment and value of precision in deep radiotherapy. Acta radiol. 1960, Suppl. No. 189
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dahl O., Thoraeus R., Vikterlöf K. J. Erzielung der homogenen Dosisverteilung bei Rotationsbestrahlung. Strahlentherapie 1956; 99: 196
   Google Scholar
• Depth dose Tables for use in Radiotherapy. Brit. J. Radiol. Suppl. 1961; 10
   Google Scholar
• Devois A., Decker R., Siboulet J. La dosimétrie en curiepuncture: presentation d'un appareil de reproduction spatiale des punctures. J. Radiol. électrol. 1958; 39: 333
   Google Scholar
• Du Sault L. A. A simplified method of treatment planning. Radiology 1959; 73: 85
   Google Scholar
• Du Sault L. A., Legaré J.-M. Dosage calculations for oblique beams of radiation. Radiology 1963; 80: 856
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dutreix A., Dutreix J. Construction des isodoses pour les surfaces obliques et irrégulières. J. Radiol. Électrol. 1962; 43: 671
   Google Scholar
• Dutreix A., Dutreix J., Tubiana M. Corrections d'hétérogénéité dans les faisceaux du Co-60. J. Radiol. Électrol. 1959; 40: 243
   Google Scholar
• Dutreix A., Dutreix J., Tubiana M. Evaluation des doses tenant compte de l'hétérogénéité de l'organisme en télécobaltthérapie. Radiobiol. Radiothér. 1960; 1: 3
   Google Scholar
• Egan R., Johnson G. C. Multisection transverse tomography in radium implant calculations. Radiology 1960; 74: 407
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ellis F., Miller H. The use of wedge filters in deep X-ray therapy. Brit. J. Radiol. 1944; 17: 904
   Google Scholar
• Ellis F., Oliver R. The specification of tumour dose. Brit. J. Radiol. 1961; 34: 258
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ellis F., Feldman A., Oliver R. Compensation for tissue inhomogeneity in cobalt-60 therapy. Brit. J. Radiol. 1964; 37: 795
   Google Scholar
• Ellis F., Hall E. J., Oliver R. A compensator for variations in tissue thickness for high energy beams. Brit. J. Radiol. 1959; 32: 421
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ellis F., Shanks W., Oliver R., Kemp L. A. W. The use of wedge filters in X-ray therapy. J. Fac. Radiol. 1950; 1: 231
   Google Scholar
• Farr R. F. Dosage control through radiographs of radon seed implants. Brit. J. Radiol. 1953; 26: 429
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farr R. F. Obliquity correction by isodose chart shift. Letter: Brit. J. Radiol. 1963; 36: 699
   Google Scholar
• Farr R. F. Transverse axial tomography. Blackwell's Scientific Publications, Oxford 1964
   Google Scholar
• Fedoruk S. O., Johns H. E. Transmission dose measurements for cobalt-60 radiation with special reference to rotation therapy. Brit. J. Radiol. 1957; 30: 190
   Google Scholar
• Fowler J. F. Solid state dosimetry. Phys. Med. Biol. 1963; 8: 1
   Google Scholar
• Fowler J. F., Farmer F. T. Measured dose distributions in arc and rotation therapy. A critical comparison of moving and fixed field techniques. Brit. J. Radiol. 1957; 30: 653
   Google Scholar
• Fowler J. F., Svarcer V., Deeley T. J., Shuttleworth E. Exit doses for lung and pharynx fields measured by lithium fluoride thermoluminescent dosimetry. Paper read at International Conference on Luminescence Dosimetry, USA, June, 21–231965. Stanford University
   Google Scholar
• Frain C., Lacroix F. De l'obtention de coupes horizontales. J. Radiol. Électrol. 1948; 29: 256
   Google Scholar
• Frain C., Surmont J., Tubiana M., et al. Intérět de la tomographie transversale (coupes horizontales) dans le repérage, le centrage et la dosimétrie des tumeurs thoraciques traitées par radiothérapies transcutanées. J. Radiol. Électrol. 1955; 36: 792
   Google Scholar
• Friedman M., Mine G. J., Dresner J. Principles of supervoltage (2 million volts) rotation therapy. Radiology 1955; 64: 1
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Garrett J. H., Jones D. E. A. Distribution problems in megavoltage therapy. II. Obliquity problems in megavoltage therapy. Brit. J. Radiol. 1962; 35: 739
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van De Geijn J. Compensation for the effect of oblique incidence of cobalt 60 radiation beams in teletherapy. Brit. J. Radiol. 1963; 36: 56, (a)
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van De Geijn J. Dose distribution in moving beam cobalt-60 teletherapy—a generalized calculation method. Brit. J. Radiol. 1963; 36: 879, (b)
   Google Scholar
• Giaux G., Swyngedaux J., Rohart J., Rozan R. Contribution à l'étude de la dosimétrie en télécobaltthérapie par champs fixes. J. Radiol. Électrol. 1964; 45: 547
   Google Scholar
• Greene D., Stewart J. G. Isodose curves in non-uniform phantoms. Brit. J. Radiol. 1965; 38: 378
   Google Scholar
• Gregory C. Dosage distribution in rotational cobalt-60 therapy. A simplified method of computation. Brit. J. Radiol. 1957; 30: 538
   Google Scholar
• Hall E. J., Oliver R. The use of standard isodose distributions with high energy radiation beams—the accuracy of a compensator technique in correcting for body contours. Brit. J. Radiol. 1961; 34: 43
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hall E. J., Oliver R. The use of metal compensators to correct for tissue heterogeneity in radiotherapy with high energy beams. Brit. J. Radiol. 1962; 35: 852
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Halldén H., Ragnhult I., Roos B. Computer method for treatment planning in external radiotherapy. Acta radiol. Ther. Phys. Biol. 1963; 1: 407
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haynes R. H., Froese G. Idealized body contours in rotation dosimetry. Acta radiol. 1957; 48: 209
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henschke U. K. The treatment of cancer with small sources of radioactive iridium. Treatment of cancer and allied diseases2nd edition, Pack, Ariel. Hoeber, New York 1958
   Google Scholar
• Henschke U. K. Afterloading applicator for radiation therapy of carcinoma of the uterus. Radiology 1960; 74: 834
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henschke U. K., Hilaris B. S., Mahan G. D. Remote afterloading with intracavitary applicators. Radiology 1964; 83: 344
   Google Scholar
• Henschke U. K., Hilaris B. S., Mahan G. D. Remote afterloading for intracavitary radiation therapy. Progress in Clinical Cancer. Grune and Stratton, New York 1965; 127
   Google Scholar
• Holodny E. I., Ragazzoni G. D., Bronstein E. L., Laughlin J. S. Patient effective thickness contour measurement. Radiology 1964; 82: 131
   Google Scholar
• Hope C. S., Orr J. S. Computer optimization of 4 MeV treatment planning. Phys. Med. Biol. 1965; 10: 365
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hope C. S., Walters J. H. The computation of single and multiple field depth doses for 4 MV X-rays. Phys. Med. Biol. 1964; 9: 517
   Google Scholar
• Hope C. S., Laurie J., Orr J. G., Walters J. H. The computation of dose distribution in cervix radium treatment. Phys. Med. Biol. 1964; 9: 345
   Google Scholar
• Horsler A. F. C., Jones J. C., Stacey A. J. Caesium-137 sources for use in intracavitary and interstitial radiotherapy. Brit. J. Radiol. 1964; 37: 385
   Google Scholar
• Horwitz H., Kereiakes J. G., Bahr G. K., et al. An after-loading system utilizing cesium-137 for the treatment of carcinoma of the cervix. Amer. J. Roentgenol. 1964; 91: 176
   Google Scholar
• Howarth J. L., Pick V. J. The use of a new multi-field isodose contour plotter. Brit. J. Radiol. 1960; 33: 265
   Google Scholar
• Hultberg S., Dahl O., Thoraeus R., et al. Kilocurie cobalt 60 therapy at the Radiumhemmet. Equipment, technique and dose measurements. Acta radiol. 1959, Suppl. No. 179
   Google Scholar
• Jacobson L. E., Knauer I. S. Absorption in different tissues of cobalt 60 gamma radiation and roentgen rays with half-value layers from 1 mm Al to 5 mm Cu. Radiology 1956; 66: 70, (a)
   Google Scholar
• Jacobson L. E., Knauer I. S. Correction factors for tumour dose in the chest cavity due to diminished absorption and scatter in lung tissue. Radiology 1956; 67: 863, (b)
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johns H. E., Morrison M. T., Whitmore G. F. Dosage calculations for rotation therapy with special reference to cobalt 60. Amer. J. Roentgenol. 1956; 75: 1105
   Google Scholar
• Johns H. E., Whitmore G. F., Watson T. A., Umberg F. H. A system of dosimetry for rotation therapy with typical rotation distributions. J. Canad. Assoc. Radiol. 1953; 4: 1
   Google Scholar
• Jones D. E. A., Gregory C., Birchall I. Dosage distribution in rotational cobalt 60 therapy. Brit. J. Radiol. 1956; 29: 196
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kahr E. Ein neues Lokalisationsgerät für Gammatron 2. Strahlentherapie 1963; 121: 69
   Google Scholar
• Karzmark C. J., White J., Fowler J. F. Lithium fluoride thermoluminescence dosimetry. Phys. Med. Biol. 1964; 9: 273
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kemp L. A. W. An improved dose calculator for linear radioactive sources. Acta radiol. 1950; 33: 17
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kieffer J. The laminagraph and its variations: applications and implications of the planigraphic principles. Amer. J. Roentgenol. 1938; 39: 497
   Google Scholar
• Kligerman M. M., Rosen E. G., Quimby E. H. Rotation therapy techniques applicable to standard deep X-ray machines. Radiology 1954; 62: 183
   Google Scholar
• Kligerman M. M., Vreeland H. W., Havinga J. A graphical method for the localization of radium sources for dosage calculation. Amer. J. Roentgenol. 1956; 75: 484
   Google Scholar
• Laughlin J. S., Siler W. M., Holodny E. I., Ritter F. W. Dose description system for interstitial radiation therapy; seed implants. Amer. J. Roentgenol. 1963; 89: 470
   Google Scholar
• Legaré J.-M. L'obtention des isodoses en roentgenothérapie rotatoire et àfaisceaux multiples. J. Radiol. électrol. 1964; 45: 649
   Google Scholar
• Lindsay D. D. The organization of the computer system of X-ray case planning at the Lincolnshire Radiotherapy Centre. Radiology 1952; 58: 850
   Google Scholar
• Loevinger R., Spira J. Dosimetry of multiple radiation fields by superposition of photographic films. Amer. J. Roentgenol. 1957; 77: 869
   Google Scholar
• MacDonald J. C. F. Simplified techniques in the employment of a rotational cobalt 60 beam therapy unit. Amer. J. Roentgenol. 1961; 86: 370
   Google Scholar
• Malsky S. J., Amato C. G., Reid C. B., Maddalone L. In-vivo dosimetry with gold shielded miniature glass rods. I. Physical development. Amer. J. Roentgenol. 1961; 85: 568
   Google Scholar
• Malsky S. J., Roswit B., Amato C. G., et al. In-vivo dosimetry with miniature glass rods. Radiology 1960; 74: 107
   Google Scholar
• Martin J. H., Evans E. A., Anderson F. J. Accuracy in radiotherapy. Radiology 1960; 75: 552
   Google Scholar
• Massey J. B. Dose distribution problems in megavoltage therapy. I. The problem of air spaces. Brit. J. Radiol. 1962; 35: 736
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Meredith W. J. Dosage control in interstitial gamma-ray therapy. Brit. J. Radiol. 1951; 24: 380
   Google Scholar
• Meredith W. J. The reference point for percentage depth dose data and a proposal for an output calibration method. Brit. J. Radiol. 1963; 36: 801
   Google Scholar
• Meredith W. J., Stephenson S. K. The use of radiographs for dosage control in interstitial gamma ray therapy. Brit. J. Radiol. 1945; 18: 86
   Google Scholar
• Meurk M. L., Adams G. D. Computer evaluation of dose rates around multiple radium sources. Radiology 1963; 80: 115
   Google Scholar
• Miceli R., Bono F., Rimondi C. L'impiego dei filtri a cuneo in cesioterapia. Dati ionimetrici ed applicazioni cliniche. Radiol. Med. 1964; 50: 31
   Google Scholar
• Morrison M. T., Bean H., Kewley N. Some measured rotation distributions for 250 kV therapy. Brit. J. Radiol. 1957; 30: 461
   Google Scholar
• Mowatt K. S., Stevens K. A. Afterloading—a contribution to the protection problem. J. Fac. Radiol. 1956; 8: 28
   Google Scholar
• Murison C. A., Hughes H. A. Physical measurements on a 4-MeV linear accelerator. Radiology 1957; 68: 367
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mussell L. E. The rapid reconstruction of radium implants—a new technique. Brit. J. Radiol. 1956; 29: 402
   Google Scholar
• Nordberg U. B. An ionization chamber with several sections for transmission dose measurements. Swedish Cancer Society Yearbok No. 3, 1963; 337
   Google Scholar
• Nuttall J. R., Spiers W. Dosage control in interstitial radium therapy. Brit. J. Radiol. 1946; 19: 135
   Google Scholar
• O'COnnor J. E. A transit dose technique for the determination of doses in inhomogeneous bodies. Brit. J. Radiol. 1956; 29: 663
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Oliva L. La tomographie dans l'établissement du plan d'irradiation. Ann. Radiol. 1963; 6: 525
   Google Scholar
• Perez-Tamayo R., Seibert C. E. Versatile positioning aid in fixed and moving field therapy in head and neck tumours. Acta radiol. Ther. Phys. Biol. 1963; 1: 225
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pfalzner P. Precalculated dose distributions in cobalt 60 fixed field and rotation therapy. Acta radiol. 1962; 58: 215
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pfalzner P. An optical treatment depth gauge for teletherapy units. Amer. J. Roentgenol. 1963; 84: 120
   Google Scholar
• Pfalzner P., Inch W. R. Rotation therapy with a cobalt 60 unit. I. Physical aspects of circumaxial rotation. Acta radiol. 1956; 45: 51
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pierquin B. La tomographie transversale: technique de routine en radiothérapie. J. Radiol. Électrol. 1961; 42: 131
   Google Scholar
• Pierquin B. Precis de curiethérapie. Masson, Paris 1964
   Google Scholar
• Pierquin B. L'iridium 192 peut-il remplacer le radium?. Presse Méd. 1965; 73: 69
   Google Scholar
• Pierquin B., Chassagne D. La préparation non-radioactive en curiethérapie interstitielle et de contact. J. Radiol. Électrol. 1962; 43: 65
   Google Scholar
• Pierquin B., Fayos J. V. Dosimetry by tomography in interstitial therapy: point technique. Amer. J. Roentgenol. 1960; 83: 585
   Google Scholar
• Pierquin B., Chassagne D., Gasiorowski M. Technique de dosimétrie en curiethérapie interstitielle par tomographie transversale. Acta radiol. 1960; 53: 314
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Proimos B. S. Synchronous field shaping in rotation megavolt therapy. Radiology 1960; 74: 753
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Proimos B. S. Synchronous protection and field shaping in cyclotherapy. Radiology 1961; 77: 591
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Proimos B. S. New accessories for precise teletherapy with cobalt-60 units. Radiology 1963; 81: 307
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Radiation Data For Medical Use. IAEA, (Vienna) 1964, Catalogue No. 1
   Google Scholar
• Richter J., Schirrmeister D. Ein Verfahren zur Berechnung der Dosisverteilungen mit digitalen Rechenautomaten. Strahlentherapie 1964; 123: 45
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ridings G. R. Fractionated intrauterine radium applications: use of a small diameter afterloading intrauterine applicator. Preliminary report. Amer. J. Roentgenol. 1963; 89: 500
   Google Scholar
• Van Roosenbeek E., Grimm J. H. Wedge filters: their construction and use with the 22 MeVp betatron. Amer. J. Roentgenol. 1961; 85: 926
   Google Scholar
• Roswit B., Malsky S. J., Amato C. G., et al. An ‘ideal’ in-vivo dosimetry system for clinical and experimental radiation therapy. Radiology 1961; 76: 295, (a)
   Google Scholar
• Roswit B., Malsky S. J., Amato C. G., et al. In-vivo dosimetry with gold-shielded miniature glass rods. II. Clinical applications in radiation therapy. Amer. J. Roentgenol. 1961; 85: 572, (b)
   Google Scholar
• Roswit B., Malsky S. J., Reid C. B., et al. A critical survey of radiation dosimeters for in-vivo dosimetry during clinical and experimental radiotherapy. Radiology 1963; 80: 293
   Google Scholar
• Roswit B., Malsky S. J., Amato C. G., , Spreckels C, et al. The use of photocells for determination of patient movement during roentgen therapy. Radiology 1960; 74: 480
   Google Scholar
• Roswit B., Unger S. M., Stein J., et al. Transverse laminagraphy: the third dimension in body section roentgenography: applications in radiation therapy. Amer. J. Roentgenol. 1959; 81: 130
   Google Scholar
• Schoknecht G. Berechnung und Ausdrucken von Dosisverteilungen für die Co-60 Teletherapie mit dem Datenverarbeitungssystem IBM 401 nach experimentell bestimmten Ausgangswerten. Strahlentherapie 1964; 125: 75
   Google Scholar
• Schulman J. H., Attix F. H., West E. J., Ginther R. J. New thermoluminescent dosimeter. Rev. Sci. Instrum. 1960; 3: 1263
   Google Scholar
• Sear R. A theoretical approach to the radiation dose-rate distribution from combined X- or gamma-ray beams, with special reference to wedge filtered beams. Phys. Med. Biol. 1959; 4: 10
   Google Scholar
• Shalek R. J. Computers in dosimetry (Editorial). Amer. J. Roentgenol. 1963; 90: 1088, (a)
   Google Scholar
• Shalek R. J. Relation of Paterson-Parker roentgens to rads. IAEA Panel on Sealed Sources in Brachytherapy, Vienna 1963, (b)
   Google Scholar
• Shalek R. J., Stovall M. A. Calculation of isodose distributions in interstitial implantations by computer. Radiology 1961; 76: 119
   Google Scholar
• Simon N. Iridium 192 as a radium substitute. Amer. J. Roentgenol. 1965; 93: 170
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Single-Field Isodose Charts For High-Energy Radiation: An International Guide. IAEA, (Vienna) 1962, Techn. Rep. Ser. No. 8.
   Google Scholar
• Skaggs L. S., Savic S. Use of an analog computer to calculate treatment dose for multiple fields. Radiology 1963; 80: 116
   Google Scholar
• Sköldborn H. On the design, physical properties and practical application of small condenser ionization chambers. Acta radiol. 1959, Suppl. No. 187
   Google Scholar
• Smith M., De F. A graphic method of reconstructing radium needle implants for calculation purposes. Amer. J. Roentgenol. 1958; 79: 42
   Google Scholar
• Spiers F. W. Effective atomic number and energy absorption in tissue. Brit. J. Radiol. 1946; 19: 52
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spiers F. W., Meredith W. J. Statement of dose in megavoltage radiotherapy. (Recommendations of the Faculty of Radiologists.). Clin. Radiol. 1962; 13: 163
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sterling T. D., Perry T. D., Bahr G. K. A practical procedure for automatic radiation treatment planning. Brit. J. Radiol. 1961; 34: 726
   Google Scholar
• Sterling T. D., Perry T. D., Katz L. Automation of radiation treatment planning. IV. Derivation of a mathematical expression for the per cent depth dose surface of cobalt-60 beams and visualisation of multiple field dose distributions. Brit. J. Radiol. 1964; 37: 544
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sterling T. D., Perry T. D., Weinkam J. J. Automation of radiation treatment planning. II. Calculation of non-convergent field dose distributions. Brit. J. Radiol. 1963; 36: 63
   Google Scholar
• Sterling T. D., Perry T. D., Weinkam J. J. Automation of radiation treatment planning. III. A simplified system of digitising isodoses and direct print-out of dose distributions. Brit. J. Radiol. 1963; 36: 522, (b)
   Google Scholar
• Stevenson J. J. Horizontal body section radiography. Brit. J. Radiol. 1950; 23: 319
   Google Scholar
• Stewart J. G. A wedge filter approach with 4 MV radiation to the treatment of carcinomata of the alveolus and antrum. Proc. Roy. Soc. Med. 1960; 53: 239
   Google Scholar
• Stewart J. G. Dose distribution problems in megavoltage therapy. III. The clinical significance of dose distribution problems. Brit. J. Radiol. 1962; 35: 743
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stovall M. A., Shalek R. J. Study of explicit distribution of radiation in interstitial implantations. I. Method of calculations with automatic digital computer. Radiology 1962; 78: 950
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suit H. D., Shalek R. J., Moore E. B., Andrews J. R. Afterloading technique with rigid needles in interstitial radiation therapy. Radiology 1961; 76: 43
   Google Scholar
• Takahashi S. Conformation radiotherapy. Rotation technique as applied to radiography and radiotherapy of cancer. Acta radiol. 1965, Suppl. No. 242
   Google Scholar
• Takahashi S., Matsuda T. Axial transverse laminagraphy applied to rotational therapy. Radiology 1960; 74: 61
   Google Scholar
• Tsien K. C. The application of automatic computing machines to radiation treatment planning. Brit. J. Radiol. 1955; 28: 432
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsien K. C. A study of basic external radiation treatment techniques with the aid of automatic computing machines. Brit. J. Radiol. 1958; 31: 32
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsien K. C., Cohen M. Isodose charts and tables for medium energy X-rays. Butterworths, London 1962
   Google Scholar
• Tsien K. C., Cunningham J. R., Wright J. D. An atlas of radiation dose distributions. Vol. III. Moving field isodose charts. IAEA, Vienna, (in press)
   Google Scholar
• Vaeth J. M., Meurk M. L. Use of the Rotterdam radium reconstruction device. Amer. J. Roentgenol. 1963; 89: 87
   Google Scholar
• Vallebona A. La stratigraphia assiale tranversa. J. Radiol. Électrol. 1948; 29: 443, — Axial transverse laminagraphy. Radiology 55, (1950), 271.
   Google Scholar
• Walstam R. Remotely controlled afterloading radiotherapy apparatus. Phys. Med. Biol. 1962; 7: 225
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Webster E. W., Tsien K. C. An atlas of radiation dose distributions. Vol. I. Single-field isodose charts. IAEA, Vienna 1965
   Google Scholar
• Witcofski R. L., Meschan I. An analysis of isodose patterns obtained with 180 degree rotation of a telecobalt unit. Amer. J. Roentgenol. 1961; 85: 919
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wood R. G. The computation of dose distribution in cobalt rotational therapy. Brit. J. Radiol. 1962; 35: 482
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Woodley R. G., Bronstein E. L., Laughlin J. S. Exit dosimeter for effective patient thickness. Radiology 1960; 74: 273
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wootton P., Shalek R. J., Fletcher G. H. Investigation of the effective absorption of radium and cobalt-60 gamma radiation in water and its clinical significance. Amer. J. Roentgenol. 1954; 71: 683
   Google Scholar