External Beam Treatment Planning: Can we deliver what we plan?

References

• Nishidai T, Nagata Y, Takahasi M, et al. CT simulator: a new 3-D planning and simulating system for radiotherapy: Part 1. Description of system. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 1990; 18: 499–504
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Nagata Y, Nishidai T, Abe M, et al. CT simulator: a new 3-D planning and simualting system for radiotherapy: Part 2 Clinical application. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 1990; 18: 505–13
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• McShan D L, Fraass B A, Lichter A S. Full integration of the beam's eye view concept into computerised treatment planning. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 1990; 18: 1485–94
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mijnheer B J, Battermann J J, Wambersie A. What degree of accuracy is required and can be achieved in photon and neutron therapy? Radiother Oncol 1987; 18: 237–52
   Google Scholar
• Svensson H. Quality assurance in radiation therapy: Physical aspects. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 1984; 10((Suppl. 1))59–65
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• International Electrotechnical Commission. Safety of medical electrical equipment. Part 2. Particular requirements for medical electron accelerators in the range 1 MeV to 50 MeV -Section 4. Functional Performance Characteristics 1986, IEC 601–2–1
   Google Scholar
• International Commission on Radiation Units and Measurements. Determination of absorbed dose in a patient irradiated by beams of × or gamma rays in radiotherapy procedures. ICRU, Washington 1976, Report 24
   Google Scholar
• Goitein M. Nonstandard deviations. Med Phys 1983; 10: 709–11
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thwaites D I, Williams J R, Aird E GA, Klevenhagen S C, Williams P C. A dosimetric intercomparision of megavoltage photon beams in UK radiotherapy centres. Phys Med Biol 1992; 37: 44–61
   Google Scholar
• Samulski T, Dubuque G L, Cacak R K, et al. Radiation therapy dosimetry reviews by the centres for radiological physics. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 1981; 7: 379–83
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Johansson K-A, Mattsson L O, Svensson H. Dosimetric inter-comparison at the Scandinavian radiation therapy centres. I. Absorbed dose intercomparison. Acta Radiol Oncol 1982; 21: 1–10
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Johnansson K-A, Horiot J C, Van Dam J, Lepinoy D, Sentenac T, Sernbo G. Quality assurance control in the EORTC cooperative group of radiotherapy 2. Dosimetric intercomparison. Radiother Oncol 1986; 7: 269–79
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wittkamper F W, Mijnheer B J, Van Kleffens J H. Dose intercomparison at the radiotherapy centres in the Netherlands I. Photon beams under reference conditions and for prostatic cancer treatment. Radiother Oncol 1987; 9: 33–44
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Svensson G K. Quality assurance in radiation therapy: Physics efforts. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 1984; 10((Suppl 1))23–9
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Rabinowitz I, Broomberg J, Goitein M, McCarthy K, Leong J. Accuracy of radiation field alignment in clinical practice. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 1985; 11: 1857–67
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leong J, Shimm D. A method for consistent precision radiation therapy. Radiother Oncol 1985; 3: 89–92
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Leunens G, Van Dam J, Dutreix A, Van Der Schueren E. Quality assurance in radiotherapy by in-vivo dosimetry. 2. Determination of the target absorbed dose. Radiother Oncol 1990; 19: 73–87
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wong J W, Slessinger E D, Hermes R E, Offutt C J, Roy T, Wannier M W. Portal dose images I. Quantitative treatment plan verification. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 1990; 18: 1455–63
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ying X, Geer L Y, Wong J W. Portal dose images II. Patient dose estimation. Int J. Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 1990; 18: 1465–75
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lam W C, Partowmah M, Lee D J, Wharam M D, Lam K S. On-line measurement of field placement errors in external beam radiotherapy. Br J Radiol 1987; 60: 361–7
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bailey N A, Horn R A, Kampp T D. Fluoroscopic visualisation of megavoltage therapeutic x-ray beams. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 1980; 6: 935–9
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Leong J. Use of digital fluoroscopy as an on-line verification device in radiation therapy. Phys Med Biol 1986; 9: 985–92
   Google Scholar
• Shalev S, Lee T, Leszczynski K, Coshy S, Chu T. Video techniques for on-line portal imaging. Comput Med Imaging Graph 1989; 13: 217–26
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• VanHerk M, Meertens H. A matrix ionisation chamber imaging device for on-line patient set-up verification during radiotherapy. Radiother Oncol 1988; 11: 369–78
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sonoda M, Takano M, Miyahara J, Kato H. Computed radiography utilising scanning laser stimulated luminescence. Radiology 1983; 148: 833–8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harrison R M. Digital radiology. Phys Med Biol 1988; 33: 751–84
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wilenzick R M, Merritt C RB, Balter S. Megavoltage portal films using computed radiographic imaging with photostimulable phosphors. Med Phys 1987; 14: 389–92
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gur D, Weiser J C, Deutch M, Fuhrman C R, Gennari R C, Rosenthal M S. Verification of electron beam therapy with conventional and storage phosphor images: preliminary experience. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 1989; 17: 1337–40
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Meertens H. Digital processing of high-energy photon beam images. Med Phys 1985; 12: 111–3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cumberlin R L, Rodgers J E, Fahey F H. Digital image processing of radiation therapy portal films. Comput Med Imaging Graph 1989; 13: 227–33
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Priestman T J, Bullimore J A, Godden T P, Deutch G P. The Royal College of Radiologists' Fractionation Survey. Clin Oncol 1989; 1: 39–46
   Google Scholar