Fluence correction factors and stopping power ratios for clinical ion beams

References

• Palmans H, Thomas R, Simon M, Duane S, Kacperek A, DuSautoy A, . A small-body portable graphite calorimeter for dosimetry in low-energy clinical proton beams. Phys Med Biol 2004;49:3737.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sakama M, Kanai T, Fukumura A, Abe K. Evaluation of w values for carbon beams in air, using a graphite calorimeter. Phys Med Biol 2009;54:1111–30.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosenschöld PMA, Aznar MC, Nygaard DE, Persson GF, Korreman SS, Engelholm SA, . A treatment planning study of the potential of geometrical tracking for intensity modulated proton therapy of lung cancer. Acta Oncol 2010;49:1141–8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paganetti H. Dose to water versus dose to medium in proton beam therapy. Phys Med Biol 2009;54:4399.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Palmans H, Al-Sulaiti L, Andreo P, Thomas RAS, Shipley DR, Martinkovič J, . Conversion of dose-to-graphite to dose-to-water in a clinical proton beam. Proceedings International Symposium on Standards, Applications and Quality Assurance in Medical Radiation Dosimetry IAEA-CN-182/277. Vienna, Austria: IAEA; 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Palmans H, Symons JE, Denis JM, de Kock EA, Jones DTL, Vynckier S. Fluence correction factors in plastic phantoms for clinical proton beams. Phys Med Biol 2002;47:3055.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Palmans H, Verhaegen F. Assigning nonelastic nuclear interaction cross sections to Hounsfield units for Monte Carlo treatment planning of proton beams. Phys Med Biol 2005;50:991.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lühr A, Hansen DC, Jäkel O, Sobolevsky N, Bassler N. Analytical expressions for water-to-air stopping-power ratios relevant for accurate dosimetry in particle therapy. Phys Med Biol 2011;56:2515–33.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sobolevsky N. SHIELD-HIT Home page [Internet]. 2011. Available from: http://www.inr.ru/shield/.
   Google Scholar
• Gudowska I, Sobolevsky N, Andreo P, Belkić D, Brahme A. Ion beam transport in tissue-like media using the Monte Carlo code SHIELD-HIT. Phys Med Biol 2004;49:1933–58.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hansen DC, Lühr A, Sobolevsky N, Bassler N. SHIELD-HIT 10A [Internet]. 2010. Available from: https://svn.nfit.au.dk/trac/shieldhit.
   Google Scholar
• Hansen DC, Lühr A, Herrmann R, Sobolevsky N, Bassler N. Recent Improvements in the SHIELD-HIT Code. Int J Rad Biol 2011 (submitted).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hansen DC, Lühr A, Sobolevsky N, Bassler N. Benchmarking nuclear models in SHIELD-HIT. 2011 (in preparation).
   Google Scholar
• Lühr A, Toftegaard J, Kantemiris I, Hansen DC, Bassler N. Stopping power: The generic library libdEdx and a study of clinically relevant stopping-power ratios for different ions. Int J Rad Biol 2011 (in press).
   Google Scholar
• Sigmund P, Schinner A, Paul H. Errata and Addenda: ICRU Report 73 (Stopping of ions heavier than helium). J ICRU [Internet]. 2009 Oct 8. Available from: http://www.icru.org/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=167.
   Google Scholar
• ICRU Report 49. Stopping powers and ranges for protons and alpha particles. Bethesda, MD: International Commission on Radiation Units and Measurements; 1993.
   Google Scholar
• Krämer M, Jäkel O, Haberer T, Kraft G, Schardt D, Weber U. Treatment planning for heavy-ion radiotherapy: Physical beam model and dose optimization. Phys Med Biol 2000; 45:3299–317.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weber U, Kraft G. Design and construction of a ripple filter for a smoothed depth dose distribution in conformal particle therapy. Phys Med Biol 1999;44:2765–75.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scholz M, Kraft G. Track structure and the calculation of biological effects of heavy charged particles. Adv Space Res 1995;18:5–14.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Janni JF. Energy loss, range, path length, time-of-flight, straggling, multiple scattering, and nuclear interaction probability: In two parts. Part 1. For 63 compounds. Part 2. For elements 1 ≤Z ≤ 92. Atom Data and Nucl Data Tables 1982;27:147–339.
   Google Scholar
• ICRU Report 63. Nuclear data for neutron and proton radiotherapy and for radiation protection. Bethesda, MD: International Commission on Radiation Units and Measurements; 2000.
   Google Scholar
• Hartnack C, Puri RK, Aichelin J, Konopka J, Bass SA, Stöcker H, . Modelling the many-body dynamics of heavy ion collisions: Present status and future perspective. Eur Phys J A 1998;1:151–69.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bassler N, Holzscheiter MH, Petersen JB. Neutron fluence in antiproton radiotherapy, measurements and simulations. Acta Oncol 2010;49:1149–59.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmitz T, Blaickner M, Schütz C, Wiehl N, Kratz JV, Bassler N, . Dose calculation in biological samples in a mixed neutron-gamma field at the TRIGA reactor of the University of Mainz. Acta Oncol 2010;49:1165–9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Medin J, Andreo P. Monte Carlo calculated stopping-power ratios, water/air, for clinical proton dosimetry (50–250 MeV). Phys Med Biol 1997;42:89.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar