Comparison of three immobilisation systems for radiation therapy in head and neck cancer

References

• Bentel GC, Marks LB, Hendren K, Brizel D. Comparison of two head and neck immobilization systems. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 1997;38:867–73.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gilbeau L, Octave-Prignot M, Loncol T, Renard L, Scalliet P, Grégoire V. Comparison of setup accuracy of three different thermoplastic masks for the treatment of brain and head and neck tumors. Radiother Oncol 2001; 58:155–62.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Engelsman M, Rosenthal SJ, Michaud SL, Adams JA, Schneider RJ, Bradley SG, et al. Intra- and interfractional patient motion for a variety of immobilization devices. Med Phys 2005;32:3468–74.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Humphreys M, Urbano MTG, Mubata C, Miles E, Harrington KJ, Bidmead M, et al. Assessment of a customised immobilisation system for head and neck IMRT using electronic portal imaging. Radiother Oncol 2005;77:39–44.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suzuki M, Nishimura Y, Nakatsu K, Okumura M, Hashiba H, Koike R, et al. Analysis of interfractional set-up errors and intrafractional organ motions during IMRT for head and neck tumors to define an appropriate planning target volume (PTV)- and planning organs at risk volume (PRV)-margins. Radiother Oncol 2006;78:283–90.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang L, Garden A, Lo J, Ang KK, Ahamad A, Morrison WH, et al. Multiple regions-of-interest analysis of setup uncertainties for head-and-neck cancer radiotherapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2006;64:1559–69.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johansen J, Bertelsen A, Hansen CR, Westberg J, Hansen O, Brink C. Set-up errors in patients undergoing image guided radiation treatment. Relationship to body mass index and weight loss. Acta Oncol 2008;47:1454–8.
   Google Scholar
• Bertelsen A, Nielsen M, Westberg J, Jensen HR, Brink C. The representitativeness of patient position during the first treatment fraction. Acta Oncol 2008;48:259–66.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Kranen S, Van Beek S, Rasch C, Van Herk M, Sonke JJ. Setup uncertainties of anatomical sub-regions in head-and-neck cancer patients after offline CBCT guidance. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2009;73:1566–73.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Velec M, Waldron JN, O’Sullivan B, Bayley A, Cummings B, Kim JJ, et al. Cone-beam CT assessment of interfraction and intrafraction setup error of two head-and-neck cancer thermoplastic masks. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2010;76: 949–55.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bel A, Van Herk M, Bartelink H, Lebesque JV. A verification procedure to improve patient set-up accuracy using portal images. Radiother Oncol 1993;29:253–60.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Boer HC, Heijmen BJ. A protocol for the reduction of systematic patient setup errors with minimal portal imaging workload. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2001;50:1350–65.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zeidan OA, Langen KM, Meeks SL, Manon RR, Wagner TH, Willoughby TR, et al. Evaluation of image-guidance protocols in the treatment of head and neck cancers. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2007;67:670–7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Houghton F, Benson RJ, Tudor GS, Fairfoul J, Gemmill J, Dean JC, et al. An assessment of action levels in imaging strategies in head and neck cancer using tomotherapy. Are our margins adequate in the absence of image guidance. Clin Oncol 2009;21:720–7.
   Google Scholar
• Bel A, Keus R, Vijlbrief RE, Lebesque JV. Setup deviations in wedged pair irradiation of parotid gland and tonsillar tumors, measured with an electronic portal imaging device. Radiother Oncol 1995;37:153–9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manning MA, Wu Q, Cardinale RM, Mohan R, Lauve AD, Kavanagh BD, et al. The effect of setup uncertainty on normal tissue sparing with IMRT for head-and-neck cancer. Int J Radiat Biol Phys 2001;51:1400–9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Asselen B, Dehnad H, Raaijmakers CPJ, Roesik JM, Lagendijk JJW, Terhaard CHJ. The dose to the parotid glands with IMRT for oropharyngeal tumors: The effect of reduction of positioning margins. Radiother Oncol 2002;64:197–204.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Den RB, Doemer A, Kubicek G, Bednarz G, Galvin JM, Keane WM, et al. Daily image guidance with cone-beam computed tomography for head-and-neck cancer intensity-modulated radiotherapy: A prospective study. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2010;76:1353–9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hong TS, Tome WA, Chappell RJ, Chinnaiyan P, Mehta MP, Harari P. The impact of daily setup variations on head-and-neck intensity-modulated radiation therapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2005;61:779–88.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen AM, Farwell DG, Luu Q, Donald PJ, Perks J, Purdy J. Evaluation of the planning target volume in the treatment of head and neck cancer with intensity-modulated radiotherapy: What is the appropriate expansion margin in the setting of daily image guidance?Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2011; 81:943–9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Herk M, Remeijer P, Rasch C, Lebesque JV. The probability of correct target dosage: Dose-population histograms for deriving treatment margins in radiotherapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2000;47:1121–35.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giske K, Stoiber EM, Schwarz M, Stoll A, Muenter MW Timke C, et al. Local setup errors in image-guided radiotherapy for head and neck cancer patients immobilized with a custom-made device. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2011;80:582–9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar