Spatio-temporal stability of pre-treatment 18F-Fludeoxyglucose uptake in head and neck squamous cell carcinomas sufficient for dose painting

References

• Due AK, Vogelius IR, Aznar MC, Bentzen SM, Berthelsen AK, Korreman SS, et al. Recurrences after intensity modulated radiotherapy for head and neck squamous cell carcinoma more likely to originate from regions with high baseline [18F]-FDG uptake. Radiother Oncol 2014;111:360–5.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bentzen SM, Gregoire V. Molecular imaging-based dose painting: A novel paradigm for radiation therapy prescription. Semin Radiat Oncol 2011;21:101–10.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Troost EGC, Schinagl DA, Bussink J, Oyen WJG, Kaanders JHAM. Clinical evidence on PET-CT for radiation therapy planning in head and neck tumours. Radiother Oncol 2010;96:328–34.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vanderstraeten B, Duthoy W, De Gersem W, De Neve W, Thierens H.[18F]fluoro-deoxy-glucose positron emission tomography ([18F]FDG-PET) voxel intensity-based intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) for head and neck cancer. Radiother Oncol 2006;79:249–58.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duprez F, De Neve W, De Gersem W, Coghe M, Madani I. Adaptive dose painting by numbers for head-and-neck cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2011;80:1045–55.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bentzen SM. Theragnostic imaging for radiation oncology: Dose-painting by numbers. Lancet Oncol 2005;6:112–7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nehmeh SA, Lee NY, Schröder H, Squire O, Zanzonico PB, Erdi YE, et al. Reproducibility of intratumor distribution of (18)F-fluoromisonidazole in head and neck cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2008;70:235–42.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Okamoto S, Shiga T, Yasuda K, Ito YM, Magota K, Kasai K, et al. High reproducibility of tumor hypoxia evaluated by 18F-fluoromisonidazole PET for head and neck cancer. J Nucl Med 2013;54:201–7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin Z, Mechalakos J, Nehmeh S, Schoder H, Lee N, Humm J, et al. The influence of changes in tumor hypoxia on dose-painting treatment plans based on 18F-FMISO positron emission tomography. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2008;70:1219–28.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fletcher JW, Djulbegovic B, Soares HP, Siegel BA, Lowe VJ, Lyman GH, et al. Recommendations on the use of 18F-FDG PET in oncology. J Nucl Med 2008;49:480–508.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoeben BAW, Bussink J, Troost EGC, Oyen WJG, Kaanders JHAM. Molecular PET imaging for biology-guided adaptive radiotherapy of head and neck cancer. Acta Oncol 2013;52:1257–71.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schinagl DA, Vogel WV, Hoffmann AL, van Dalen JA, Oyen WJG, Kaanders JHAM. Comparison of five segmentation tools for 18F-fluoro-deoxy-glucose-positron emission tomography-based target volume definition in head and neck cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2007;69:1282–9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Madani I, Duthoy W, Derie C, De Gersem W, Boterberg T, Saerens M, et al. Positron emission tomography-guided, focal-dose escalation using intensity-modulated radiotherapy for head and neck cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2007;68:126–35.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Madani I, Duprez F, Boterberg T, Van de Wiele C, Bonte K, Deron P, et al. Maximum tolerated dose in a phase I trial on adaptive dose painting by numbers for head and neck cancer. Radiother Oncol 2011;101:351–5.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berwouts D, Olteanu LAM, Duprez F, Vercauteren T, De Gersem W, De Neve W, et al. Three-phase adaptive dose-painting-by-numbers for head-and-neck cancer: Initial results of the phase I clinical trial. Radiother Oncol 2013; 107:310–6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rasmussen JH, Fischer BM, Aznar MC, Hansen AE, Vogelius IR, Löfgren J, et al. Reproducibility of FDG PET uptake measurements in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma on both PET/CT and PET/MR. Br J Radiol 2015;88:20140655.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vogelius IR, Håkansson K, Due AK, Aznar MC, Berthelsen AK, Kristensen CA, et al. Failure-probability driven dose painting. Med Phys 2013;40:081717.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van de Steene J, Linthout N, de Mey J, Vinh-Hung V, Claassens C, Noppen M, et al. Definition of gross tumor volume in lung cancer: Inter-observer variability. Radiother Oncol 2002;62:37–49.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Logue JP, Sharrock CL, Cowan RA, Read G, Marrs J, Mott D. Clinical variability of target volume description in conformal radiotherapy planning. Int J Radiat Oncol 1998;41:929–32.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hermans R, Feron M, Bellon E, Dupont P, Van den Bogaert W, Baert AL. Laryngeal tumor volume measurements determined with CT: A study on intra- and interobserver variability. Int J Radiat Oncol 1998;40:553–7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hong TS, Tomé WA, Harari PM. Heterogeneity in head and neck IMRT target design and clinical practice. Radiother Oncol 2012;103:92–8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Minn H, Zasadny R, Quint E, Wahl L. Lung cancer: Reproducibility of quantitative measurements for evaluating 2-[F-18]-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose up- take at PET. Radiology 1995;196:167–73.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huser DM, Burger IA, Buck A, von Schulthess GK, Burger C. Repeatability of FDG quantification in tumor imaging: Averaged SUVs are superior to SUVmax. Nucl Med Biol 2012;39:666–70.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Langen AJ, Vincent A, Velasquez LM, van Tinteren H, Boellaard R, Shankar LK, et al. Repeatability of 18F-FDG uptake measurements in tumors: A metaanalysis. J Nucl Med 2012;53:701–8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frings V, de Langen AJ, Smit EF, van Velden FHP, Hoekstra OS, van Tinteren H, et al. Repeatability of metabolically active volume measurements with 18F-FDG and 18F-FLT PET in non-small cell lung cancer. J Nucl Med 2010;51:1870–7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar