Prostate cancer patients’ quality of life assessments across the primary treatment trajectory: ‘True’ change or response shift?

References

• Herschbach P. The “well-being paradox” in quality-of-life research. Psychother Psych Med 2002;52:141–50.
   Google Scholar
• Sprangers MA, Schwartz CE. Integrating response shift into health-related quality of life research: A theoretical model. Soc Sci Med 1999;48:1507–15.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oort FJ, Visser MR, Sprangers MA. An application of structural equation modeling to detect response shifts and true change in quality of life data from cancer patients undergoing invasive surgery. Qual Life Res 2005;14:599–609.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sharpe L, Butow P, Smith C, McConnell D, Clarke S. Changes in quality of life in patients with advanced cancer: Evidence of response shift and response restriction. J Psychosom Res 2005;58:497–504.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Visser MR, Oort FJ, Sprangers MA. Methods to detect response shift in quality of life data: A convergent validity study. Qual Life Res 2005;14:629–39.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hinz A, Finck Barboza C, Zenger M, Singer S, Schwalenberg T, Stolzenburg JU. Response shift in the assessment of anxiety, depression and perceived health in urologic cancer patients: An individual perspective. Eur J Cancer Care 2011;20:601–9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Serdà I Ferrer B-C, del Valle A, Marcos-Gragera R. Prostate cancer and quality of life: Analysis of response shift using triangulation between methods. J Gerontol Nurs 2014;40:32–41.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rees J, Clarke MG, Waldron D, O'boyle C, Ewings P, MacDonagh RP. The measurement of response shift in patients with advanced prostate cancer and their partners. Health Qual Life Outcomes 2005; 3:21–29.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Korfage IJ, de Koning HJ, Essink-Bot ML. Response shift due to diagnosis and primary treatment of localized prostate cancer: A then-test and a vignette study. Qual Life Res 2007;16:1627–34.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jelitte M. Untersuchung von Response-Shift-Einflüssen auf die Erfassung der gesundheitsbezogenen Lebensqualität bei Prostatakrebspatienten in der onkologischen Rehabilitation. Landau: Dissertation, University of Koblenz-Landau, 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Aaronson NK, Ahmedzai S, Bergman B, Bullinger M, Cull A, Duez NJ, et al. The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer QLQ-C30: A quality-of-life instrument for use in international clinical trials in oncology. J Natl Cancer Inst 1993;85:365–76.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cocks K, King MT, Velikova G, de Castro G, Jr, Martyn St-James M, Fayers PM, et al. Evidence-based guidelines for interpreting change scores for the European Organisation for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30. Eur J Cancer 2012;48:1713–21.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• King-Kallimanis BL, ter Hoeven CL, de Haes HC, Smets EM, Koning CC, Oort FJ. Assessing measurement invariance of a health-related quality-of-life questionnaire in radiotherapy patients. Qual Life Res 2012;21: 1745–53.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boehmer S, Luszczynska A. Two kinds of items in quality of life instruments: 'Indicator and causal variables' in the EORTC QLQ-C30. Qual Life Res 2006;15:131–41.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oort FJ. Using structural equation modeling to detect response shifts and true change. Qual Life Res 2005;14:587–98.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saris WE, Satorra A, van der Veld WM. Testing structural equation models or detection of misspecifications? Structural Equation Modeling 2009;16:561–82.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen J. Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences, 2nd ed. Hillsdale NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates; 1988.
   Google Scholar
• Kline RB. Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modelling, 2nd ed. New York: Guilford; 2005.
   Google Scholar
• Steiger JH. Understanding the limitations of global fit assessment in structural equation modelling. Personal Individ Diff 2007;42:893–8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oberski DJ. Jrule for Mplus. Version 0.91. http://wiki.github.com/daob/JruleMplus/[accessed April 30, 2015].
   Google Scholar
• Schwartz CE, Rapkin BD. Understanding appraisal processes underlying the thentest: A mixed methods investigation. Qual Life Res 2012;21:381–8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steenkamp JBEM, Baumgartner H. Assessing measurement invariance in cross-national consumer research. J Consum Res 1998;25:78–90.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steinmetz H. Analyzing observed composite differences across groups - Is partial measurement invariance enough? Methodology 2013;9:1–12.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Donaldson GW. Structural equation models for quality of life response shifts: Promises and pitfalls. Qual Life Res 2005;14:2345–51.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar