2,373
Views
22
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
ORIGINAL ARTICLES: Gynecological malignancies

Dosimetric advantages of proton therapy compared with photon therapy using an adaptive strategy in cervical cancer

, , , , , & show all
Pages 892-899 | Received 12 Oct 2015, Accepted 04 Jan 2016, Published online: 03 Mar 2016

References

  • Eifel PJ, Winter K, Morris M, Levenback C, Grigsby PW, Cooper J, et al. Pelvic irradiation with concurrent chemotherapy versus pelvic and para-aortic irradiation for high-risk cervical cancer: an update of radiation therapy oncology group trial (RTOG) 90-01. J Clin Oncol 2004;22:872–80.
  • Portelance L, Chao KS, Grigsby PW, Bennet H, Low D. Intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) reduces small bowel, rectum, and bladder doses in patients with cervical cancer receiving pelvic and para-aortic irradiation. Int. J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2001;51:261–6.
  • Jadon R, Pembroke CA, Hanna CL, Palaniappan N, Evans M, Cleves AE, et al. A systematic review of organ motion and image-guided strategies in external beam radiotherapy for cervical cancer. Clin Oncol 2014;26:185–96.
  • Stewart J, Lim K, Kelly V, Xie J, Brock KK, Moseley J, et al. Automated weekly replanning for intensity-modulated radiotherapy of cervix cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2010;78:350–8.
  • Vestergaard A, Søndergaard J, Petersen JB, Høyer M, Muren LP. A comparison of three different adaptive strategies in image-guided radiotherapy of bladder cancer. Acta Oncol 2010;49:1069–76.
  • Lutkenhaus LJ, Visser J, de Jong R, Hulshof MCCM, Bel A. Evaluation of delivered dose for a clinical daily adaptive plan selection strategy for bladder cancer radiotherapy. Radiother Oncol 2015;116:51–6.
  • Heijkoop ST, Langerak TR, Quint S, Bondar L, Mens JWM, Heijmen BJM, et al. Clinical implementation of an online adaptive plan-of-the-day protocol for nonrigid motion management in locally advanced cervical cancer IMRT. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2014;90:673–9.
  • Marnitz S, Wlodarczyk W, Neumann O, Koehler C, Weihrauch M, Budach V, et al. Which technique for radiation is most beneficial for patients with locally advanced cervical cancer? Intensity modulated proton therapy versus intensity modulated photon treatment, helical tomotherapy and volumetric arc therapy for primary radiation – an individual comparison. Radiat Oncol 2015;10:91.
  • Johansson B, Ridderheim M, Glimelius B. The potential of proton beam radiation therapy in prostate cancer, other urological cancers and gynaecological cancers. Acta Oncol 2005;44:890–5.
  • Engelsman M, Schwarz M, Dong L. Physics controversies in proton therapy. Semin Radiat Oncol 2013;23:88–96.
  • Song WY, Huh SN, Liang Y, White G, Nichols RC, Watkins T, et al. Dosimetric comparison study between intensity modulated radiation therapy and three­dimensional conformal proton therapy for pelvic bone marrow sparing in the treatment of cervical cancer. J Appl Clin Med Phys 2014;11:1–8.
  • Georg D, Kirisits C, Hillbrand M, Dimopoulos J, Pötter R. Image-guided radiotherapy for cervix cancer: high-tech external beam therapy versus high-tech brachytherapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2008;71:1272–8.
  • Milby AB, Both S, Ingram M, Lin LL. Dosimetric comparison of combined intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) and proton therapy versus IMRT alone for pelvic and para-aortic radiotherapy in gynecologic malignancies. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2012;82:e477–84.
  • Gay HA, Barthold HJ, O’Meara E, Bosch WR, El Naqa I, Al-Lozi R, et al. Pelvic normal tissue contouring guidelines for radiation therapy: a Radiation Therapy Oncology Group consensus panel atlas. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2012;83:e353–62.
  • Bondar L, Hoogeman MS, Vásquez Osorio EM, Heijmen BJM. A symmetric nonrigid registration method to handle large organ deformations in cervical cancer patients. Med Phys 2010;37:3760–72.
  • Fredriksson A, Forsgren A, Hårdemark B. Minimax optimization for handling range and setup uncertainties in proton therapy. Med Phys 2011;38:1672–84.
  • van de Schoot AJAJ, Visser J, van Kesteren Z, Janssen TM, Rasch CRN, Bel A. Beam configuration selection for robust intensity-modulated proton therapy in cervical cancer using Pareto front comparison. Phys Med Biol 2016; 61:1780-1794
  • Paganetti H, Niemierko A, Ancukiewicz M, Gerweck LE, Goitein M, Loeffler JS, et al. Relative biological effectiveness (RBE) values for proton beam therapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2002;53:407–21.
  • Stenmark MH, Conlon ASC, Johnson S, Daignault S, Litzenberg D, Marsh R, et al. Dose to the inferior rectum is strongly associated with patient reported bowel quality of life after radiation therapy for prostate cancer. Radiother Oncol 2014;110:291–7.
  • Roeske JC, Bonta D, Mell LK, Lujan AE, Mundt AJ. A dosimetric analysis of acute gastrointestinal toxicity in women receiving intensity-modulated whole-pelvic radiation therapy. Radiother Oncol 2003;69:201–7.
  • Weistrand O, Svensson S. The ANACONDA algorithm for deformable image registration in radiotherapy. Med Phys 2015;42:40–53.
  • Heijkoop ST, Langerak TR, Quint S, Mens JWM, Zolnay AG, Heijmen BJM, et al. Quantification of intra-fraction changes during radiotherapy of cervical cancer assessed with pre- and post-fraction Cone Beam CT scans. Radiother Oncol 2015;117:536–41.
  • van de Schoot AJAJ, Schooneveldt G, Wognum S, Hoogeman MS, Chai X, Stalpers LJA, et al. Generic method for automatic bladder segmentation on cone beam CT using a patient-specific bladder shape model. Med Phys 2014;41:031707.
  • van Rooijen DC, van Wieringen N, Stippel G, Crezee J, Koning CCE, Bel A. Dose-guided radiotherapy: potential benefit of online dose recalculation for stereotactic lung irradiation in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2012;83:e557–62.
  • Wognum S, Heethuis SE, Rosario T, Hoogeman MS, Bel A. Validation of deformable image registration algorithms on CT images of ex vivo porcine bladders with fiducial markers. Med Phys 2014;41:071916.