Use of a Loudness Model for Hearing Aid Fitting. IV. Fitting Hearing Aids with Multi-Channel Compression so as to Restore ‘Normal’ Loudness for Speech at Different Levels

References

• Allen, JB, Jeng, PS. Loudness growth in 1/2-octave bands (LGOB); a procedure for the assessment of loudness J Acoust Soc Am 1990 88 745–53.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ANSI. ANSI S3.5-1997, American national standards methods for the calculation of the articulation index American National Standards Institute New York 1997.
   Google Scholar
• Bonding, P. Critical bandwidth in loudness summation in sensorineural hearing loss Br J Audiol 1979 13 23–30.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bonding, P, Elberling, C. Loudness summation across frequency under masking and in sensorineural hearing loss Audiology 1980 19 57–74.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Braida, LD, Durlach, NI, De Gennaro, SV, Peterson, PM, Bustamante, DK. Review of recent research on multiband amplitude compression for the hearing impaired. The Vanderbilt Hearing-Aid Report Studebaker, GA, Bess, FH Monographs in Contemporary Audiology Upper Darby, PA 1982 133–40.
   Google Scholar
• Byrne, D, Dillon, H. The National Acoustic Laboratories' (NAL) new procedure for selecting the gain and frequency response of a hearing aid Ear Hear 1986 7 257–65.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Byrne, D, Dillon, H, Tran, K An international comparison of long-term average speech spectra J Acoust Soc Am 1994 96 2108–20.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cox, RM. Using loudness data for hearing aid selection. The IHAFF approach Hear J 1995 48 10 39–44.
   Google Scholar
• Elberling, C. Loudness scaling revisited J Am Acad Audiol 1999 10 248–60.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Florentine, M, Zwicker, E. A model of loudness summation applied to noise-induced hearing loss Hear Res 1979 1 121–32.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hohmann, V. Dynamikkompression für Hörgeräte - Psychoakustische Grundlagen und Algorithmen VDI-Verlag Düsseldorf 1993.
   Google Scholar
• Hohmann, V, Kollmeier, B. Perceptual models for hearing aid algorithms. Psychoacoustics, Speech and Hearing Aids Kollmeier, B World Scientific Singapore 1996 193–202.
   Google Scholar
• Kiessling, J. Scaling methods for the selection, fitting and evaluation of hearing aids. Psychoacoustics, Speech and Hearing Aids Kollmeier, B World Scientific Singapore 1997 297–306.
   Google Scholar
• Killion, MC, Fikret-Pasa, S. Three types of sensorineural hearing loss: Loudness and intelligibility considerations Hear J 1993 46 31–6.
   Google Scholar
• Kollmeier, B, Hohmann, V. Loudness estimation and compensation employing a categorical scale. Advances in Hearing Research Manley, GA, Klump, GM, Köppl, C, Fastl, H, Oeckinghaus, H World Scientific Singapore 1995 441–51.
   Google Scholar
• Launer, S. Loudness perception in listeners with sensorineural hearing impairment 1995 PhD, Oldenburg, Germany.
   Google Scholar
• Launer, S, Hohmann, V, Kollmeier, B. Modeling loudness growth and loudness summation in hearing-impaired listeners. Modeling Sensorineural Hearing Loss Jesteadt, W Erlbaum Mahwah, NJ 1997 175–85.
   Google Scholar
• Leijon, A. Optimization of hearing-aid gain and frequency response for cochlear hearing losses Chalmers University of Technology Sweden 1989 PhD.
   Google Scholar
• Leijon, A. Hearing aid gain for loudness-density normalization in cochlear hearing losses with impaired frequency resolution Ear Hear 1990 12 242–50.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marzinzik, M, Appell, JE, Hohmann, V, Kollmeier, B. Evaluation of dynamic compression algorithms using a loudness model for hearing impaired listeners. Psychoacoustics, Speech and Hearing Aids Kollmeier, B World Scientific Singapore 1996 203–7.
   Google Scholar
• Moore, BCJ Signal processing to compensate for reduced dynamic range. Recent Developments in Hearing Instrument Technology Beilin, J, Jensen, GR Stougaard Jensen Copenhagen 1993 147–65.
   Google Scholar
• Moore, BCJ An Introduction to the Psychology of Hearing (fourth edition) Academic San Diego, CA 1997.
   Google Scholar
• Moore, BCJ Cochlear Hearing Loss Whurr Publishers London 1998.
   Google Scholar
• Moore, BCJ, Glasberg, BR. The role of frequency selectivity in the perception of loudness, pitch and time. Frequency Selectivity in Hearing Moore, BCJ Academic London 1986 251–308.
   Google Scholar
• Moore, BCJ, Glasberg, BR. A comparison of four methods of implementing automatic gain control (AGC) in hearing aids Br J Audiol 1988 22 93–104.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Moore, BCJ, Glasberg, BR. A model of loudness perception applied to cochlear hearing loss Auditory Neurosci 1997 3 289–311.
   Google Scholar
• Moore, BCJ, Glasberg, BR. Use of a loudness model for hearing aid fitting. I. Linear hearing aids Br J Audiol 1998 32 301–19.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Moore, BCJ, Glasberg, BR, Stone, MA. Optimization of a slow-acting automatic gain control system for use in hearing aids Br J Audiol 1991 25 171–82.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Moore, BCJ, Glasberg, BR, Baer, T. A model for the prediction of thresholds, loudness and partial loudness J Audio Eng Soc 1997 45 224–40.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moore, BCJ, Alcántara, JI, Glasberg, BR. Development and evaluation of a procedure for fitting multi-channel compression hearing aids Br J Audiol 1998 32 177–95.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moore, BCJ, Alcántara, JI, Stone, MA, Glasberg, BR. Use of a loudness model for hearing aid fitting. II. Hearing aids with multi-channel compression Br J Audiol 1999a 33 157–70.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moore, BCJ, Glasberg, BR, Stone, MA. Use of a loudness model for hearing aid fitting. III. A general method for deriving initial fittings for hearing aids with multi-channel compression Br J Audiol 1999b 33 241–58.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moore, BCJ, Glasberg, BR, Vickers, DA. Further evaluation of a model of loudness perception applied to cochlear hearing loss J Acoust Soc Am 1999c 106 898–907.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moore, BCJ, Vickers, DA, Baer, T, Launer, S. Factors affecting the loudness of modulated sounds J Acoust Soc Am 1999d 105 2757–72.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moore, BCJ, Huss, M, Vickers, DA, Glasberg, BR, Alcántara, JI. A test for the diagnosis of dead regions in the cochlea Br J Audiol ( submitted).
   Google Scholar
• Pluvinage, V. Clinical measurement of loudness growth Hear Inst 1989 39 28–9 32.
   Google Scholar
• Scharf, B, Hellman, RP. Model of loudness summation applied to impaired ears J Acoust Soc Am 1966 40 71–8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shaw, EAG Transformation of sound pressure level from the free field to the eardrum in the horizontal plane J Acoust Soc Am 1974 56 1848–61.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steinberg, JC, Gardner, MB. The dependency of hearing impairment on sound intensity J Acoust Soc Am 1937 9 11–23.
   Google Scholar
• Stone, MA, Moore, BCJ Syllabic compression: Effective compression ratios for signals modulated at different rates Br J Audiol 1992 26 351–61.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Studebaker, G. The effect of equating loudness on audibility-based hearing aid selection J Am Acad Audiol 1992 3 113–8.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Villchur, E. Signal processing to improve speech intelligibility in perceptive deafness J Acoust Soc Am 1973 53 1646–57.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zwicker, E, Flottorp, G, Stevens, SS. Critical bandwidth in loudness summation J Acoust Soc Am 1957 29 548–57.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zwicker, E, Scharf, B. A model of loudness summation Psych Rev 1965 72 3–26.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar