Electrocochleographical Studies in Humans

References

• Blegvad B., Terkildsen K. Békésy audiometry, SISI test and contralateral masking. Acta Otolaryng. 1966; 62: 453–460
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Coles R. R. A., Thornton A. R. D. Audiology research in the I.S.V.R.'s first decade. J. Sound Vibr. 1973; 28(3)313–332
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cullen J. K., Ellis M. S., Berlin C. I., Lousteau R. J. Human acoustic nerve action potential recordings from the tympanic membrane without anesthesia. Acta Otolaryng. 1972; 74: 15–22
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dewson J. H., III. Efferent olivocochlear bundle: some relationships to noise masking and to stimulus attenuation. J. Neurophysiol. 1967; 30: 817–832
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fex J. Auditory activity in centrifugal and centripetal cochlear fibres in cat. Acta Physiol. Scand., Suppl. 1962; 189: 1–68
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Galambos R. Suppression of auditory nerve activity by stimulation of efferent fibres to cochlea. J. Neurophysiol. 1956; 19: 424–437
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Galambos R., Bauer J., Picton T., Squires K., Squires N. Loudness enhancement following contralateral stimulation. J. Acoust. Soc. Amer. 1972; 52: 1127–1130
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jewett D. L. Volume-conducted potentials in response to auditory stimuli as detected by averaging in the cat. Electro-enceph. Clin. Neurophysiol. 1970; 28: 609–618
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Keidel W. D., Spreng M. Recent status results and problems of objective audiometry in man. J. Franc. Otorhinolaryng. 1970; 19: 45–53
   Google Scholar
• Kevanishvili Z. Sh., Kajaia O. A., Gvacharia Z. V. Auditory averaged evoked responses in anesthetized cats. Audiology, Suppl. 11 1972; 109–110
   Google Scholar
• Khechinashvili S. N., Kevanishvili Z. Sh., Kajaia O. A. Evoked potentials of the auditory system in man. J. Physiol. USSR 1972; 58: 527–533
   Google Scholar
• Lev A., Sohmer H. Sources of averaged neural responses recorded in animal and human subjects during cochlear audiometry (electrocochleogram). Arch. Klin. Exp. Ohr. Nas. Kehlkopfheilk. 1972; 201: 79–90
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• McRobert H., Bryan M. E., Tempest W. The effect of middle ear muscle contractions on sound transmission through the human ear. Int. Audiology 1969; 8: 557–561
   Google Scholar
• Nieder P., Nieder I. Antimasking effect of crossed olivocochlear bundle stimulation with loud clicks in guinea pig. Exp. Neurol. 1971; 28: 179–188
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Osterhammel P., Terkildsen K., Arndal P. Evoked responses to SISI stimuli, contralateral masking effects. ActaOtolaryng., Suppl. 1970; 263: 245–247
   Google Scholar
• Portmann M., Aran J.-M., LeBert G. Électro-cochléogramme en dehors de tout intervention chirurgicale. Acta Otolaryng. 1968; 65: 105–114
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Rosenblith W. A., Rosenzweig M. R. Electrical responses to acoustic clicks: influence of electrode location in cats. J. Acoust. Soc. Amer. 1951; 23: 583–588
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rowley R. R., Studebaker G. A. Loudness-intensity relations under various levels of contralateral noise. J. Acoust Soc. Amer. 1971; 49: 499–504
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salomon G., Elberling C. Cochlear action potentials recorded from the external ear in man. Acta Otolaryng. 1971; 71: 319–325
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sohmer H., Feinmesser M. Cochlear action potentials recorded from the external ear in man. Ann. Otol. 1967; 76: 427–436
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sokolich W. G., Zwislocki J. J. On the loudness enhancement of a tone burst by a preceding tone burst. J. Acoust. Soc. Amer. 1972; 52: 141–142
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trahiotis C., Elliott D. N. Behavioral investigation of some possible effects of sectioning the crossed olivocochlear bundle. J. Acoust. Soc. Amer. 1970; 47: 592–596
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yoshie N., Ohashi T. Clinical use of cochlear nerve action potential responses in man for differential diagnosis of hearing losses. Acta Otolaryng., Suppl 1969; 252: 71–87
   PubMedGoogle Scholar