Specialist Professionals Needed

References

• de ľEpee Abbe. The true methods of educating the deaf and dumb, confirmed by long experience. American Annals of the Deaf 1860; 1, and 2.
   Google Scholar
• Albright M. A. Ear, eye or both. Volta Review 1944; 46: 11–13
   Google Scholar
• Amman J. C. A dissertation on speech. American Annals of the Deaf 1874; 19: 31–34
   Google Scholar
• Asher W. T. Intelligibility tests: a review of their standardisation, some experiments and a new test. Speech Monograph 1958; 25: 14–28
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ballantyne J. Iatrogenic deafness. 16th James Yearsley Memorial Lecture. Journal of Laryngology 1970, October, 967–1000.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Barr B., Wedenberg. Prognosis of perceptive hearing loss in children with respect to genesis and use of hearing aid. Acta Otolaryngolica 1965; 59: 464–474
   Google Scholar
• Bellefluer P. A., Van Dyke R. C. The effects of high gain amplification on children in a residential school for the deaf. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research 1968; 11: 343–347
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Belzile M., Markle D. M. A clinical comparison of monaural and binaural hearing aids worn by patients with conductive or perceptive deafness. Laryngoscope 1959; 69: 1317–1323
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bender R. E., Wiig E. Binaural hearing aids for young children. Volta Review 1960; 62: 113–115
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beranek L. Acoustic Measurements. John Wiley & Sons Inc, NY 1949
   Google Scholar
• Berger K. W. Vowel confusions in speechreading. Ohio Journal of Speech and Hearing 1970; 5: 123–128
   Google Scholar
• Berger K. W. Motivation in speech-reading. Teacher of the Deaf 1971; 29: 30–32
   Google Scholar
• Berger K. W. Speech audiometry. 7 in. Audiological Assessment, D. E. Rose. Prentice-Hall Inc, New Jersey 1971
   Google Scholar
• Berger K. W. Speechreading, principles and methods. National Educational Press. 1972
   Google Scholar
• Berger K. W., De Pompei R. A., Droder J. L. The effect of distance on speech-reading. Ohio Journal of Speech and Hearing 1970; 5: 115–122
   Google Scholar
• Bergman N. Binaural hearing. Archives of Otolaryngology 1957; 66: 572–578
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Best H. Deafness and Deaf in the United States. The Macmillan Co., New York 1943
   Google Scholar
• Birch J. W., Stuckless E. R. The relationship between early manual communication and later achievement of the deaf. United States Department of Health, Education and Welfare Research Project 1769. 1964
   Google Scholar
• Black J. W. The origin and nature of the studies, in Studies in Speech Intelligibility, a program of war-time research. Speech Monograms 1946; 13: 1–3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Black J. W., O'Reilly P. P., Peck L. Self-administered training in lipreading. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorder 1963; 28: 183–186
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bode D. L., Kasten R. N. Hearing aid distortion and consonant identification. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research 1971; 14: 323–331
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bonet J. P. Reduccion de las letras y arte para ensenar a ablar los mudos. Madrid 1620
   Google Scholar
• Boothroyd A. The provision of better earmoulds for deaf children. Journal of Laryngology 1965; 79
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Boothroyd A. Selection of hearing aids. University of Manchester. 1967, PhD Thesis
   Google Scholar
• Brandy W. T. Reliability of voice tests of speech discrimination. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research 1966; 9: 461–465
   Google Scholar
• Brannon J. B., Jr. Speechreading of various speech materials. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders 1961; 26: 348–352
   Google Scholar
• Broadbent D. E. Word-frequency effect and response bias. Psychological Review 1967; 74: 1–15
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Broadbent D. E., Ladefoged P. Vowel judgements and adaptation level. Proceedings Royal Society 1960; 151: 384–399
   Google Scholar
• Brockman S. J. An exploratory investigation of delayed progressive neural hypacusis in children. Archives of Otolaryngology (Chicago) 1959; 70: 340
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bruhn M. E. Methods of teaching lip reading: a symposium. Lip reading as living language. Volta Review 1942; 44: 636–638
   Google Scholar
• Bruhn M. E. Mueller-Walle method of lipreading. The Volta Bureau, Washington 1949
   Google Scholar
• Bunger A. M. Appraising progress in speech reading. Volta Review 1924; 26: 503–504
   Google Scholar
• Burcheit J. H. Lip reading. National Institute for the Deaf, London 1950
   Google Scholar
• Byers V. W., Liebermann L. Lipreading performance and the rate of the speaker. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research 1959; 2: 271
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Caraway B. J., Carhart R. Influence of compressor action on speech intelligibility. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 1967; 41: 1424–1433
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carhart R. Auditory Training. Hearing and Deafness, Davis Hallowell. Holt, Rinehart & Winston Inc., New York 1961
   Google Scholar
• Carhart R. Monaural and binaural discrimination against competing sentences. InternationalAudiology 1965; 4: 5–10
   Google Scholar
• Carlin W. T. Speech of partially-hearing school children. University of Manchester. 1964, PhD Thesis
   Google Scholar
• Cherry E. C. On Human Communication. Wiley, NY 1961
   Google Scholar
• Clarke B. R. Auditory training of profoundly deaf children. University of Manchester. 1953, PhD Thesis
   Google Scholar
• Clegg D. G. Pattern for the listening eye. National Institute for the Deaf, London 1953
   Google Scholar
• Coles R. R. A., Markides A., Priede V. Uses and abuses of speech audiometry. Disorders of Auditory Function, W. Taylor. Academic Press, London 1973
   Google Scholar
• Conklin E. S. A method for the determination of relative skill in lipreading. Volta Review 1917; 19: 216–219
   Google Scholar
• Cooper F. S., Delattre P. C., Libermann A. M., Borst J. N., Gestmann L. J. Some experiments on the perception of synthetic speech sound. Journal of the Acoustic Society of America 1952; 24: 597–606
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Corliss E. L. R., Kobal M., Burghorn S. E. Reduction of signal-to-noise ratio induced by distortion in speech transmission systems. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 1960; 32: 1502
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cornett R. O. Cued speech. American Annals of the Deaf 1964; 112: 3–13
   Google Scholar
• Costello M. R. Individual differences in speechreading. Proceedings International Congress Education of the Deaf 1963; 317–321
   Google Scholar
• Craig W. H. Effects of preschool training on the development of reading and lipreading skills of deaf children. American Annals of the Deaf 1964; 109: 280–296
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crandall I. B., Sacia C. F. A dynamic study of the vowel sound. Bell System Technical Journal 1924; 3: 232–237
   Google Scholar
• Cranwill S. A. Lipreading. American Annals of the Deaf 1962; 107: 495–498
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dale D. M. C. The possibility of providing extensive experience for severely and profoundly deaf children by the use of hearing aids. University of Manchester. 1958, PhD Thesis
   Google Scholar
• Dalgarno G. Didascalocophous, or the deaf and dumb man's tutor. American Annals |of the Deaf 1857; 9: 15–64
   Google Scholar
• Davis H., Stevens S. S., Nichols R. H. Hearing aids: an experimental study of design objectives. Harvard University Press, Cambridge 1947
   Google Scholar
• Day H. E., Eusfeld I. S., Pintner R. A survey of American Schools for the Deaf, 1924–1925. National Research Council, Washington 1928
   Google Scholar
• Delattre P. C., Liberman A. M., Cooper F. S. Acoustic loci and transitional cues for consonants. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 1955; 27: 769–773
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Denes P. B. On the statistics of spoken English. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 1963; 35: 892–904
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Denes P. B., Pinson E. N. The speech chain. Murray Hill, N. J., Bell Telephone Laboratories. 1963
   Google Scholar
• Dicarlo L. M., Brown W. J. The effectiveness of binaural hearing for adults with hearing impairment. Journal of Auditory Research 1960; 1: 35–76
   Google Scholar
• Duffy J. K. Audio-visual speech audiometry and a new audio and audio-visual speech perception index. Maico Audiological Library Series 1967; 5: 9
   Google Scholar
• Egan J. P. Articulation testing methods. Laryngoscope 1948; 58: 955–991
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Engelberg M. Test re-test variability in speech discrimination testing. Laryngoscope 1968; 78: 1582–1589
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Erber N. P. Auditory and audiovisual reception of words in low-frequency noise by children with normal hearing and by children with impaired hearing. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research 1971; 14: 496–512
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Evans L. Factors related to listening and lipreading. Teacher of the Deaf 1960; 58: 417–423
   Google Scholar
• Evans L. Psychological factors related to lipreading. Teacher of the Deaf 1965; 63: 131–136
   Google Scholar
• Ewertsen H. W., Ipsen J. B., Nielsen S. C. On acoustical characteristics of the earmould. Acta Oto/aryngologica 1957; 47: 312–317
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ewing I. R. Lipreading for adults. Teacher of the Deaf 1941; 39: 3–6
   Google Scholar
• Ewing I. R. Hearing aids, lipreading and clear speech. Manchester University Press, Manchester 1967
   Google Scholar
• Ewing I. R., Ewing A. W. G. The use of hearing aids in the treatment of defects of hearing in children. Journal of Laryngology and Otology 1936; 51: 2
   Google Scholar
• Ewing I. R., Ewing A. W. G. The handicap of deafness. Longmans Green & Co, London 1938
   Google Scholar
• Ewing A. W. G., Littler T. S. The reponses of partially deaf patients to amplified speech at controlled intensities. Paper given at Annual Meeting of the British Association. Norwich Sept. 5, 1935
   Google Scholar
• Farrimond T. Age differences in the ability to use visual cues in auditory communication. Language and Speech 1959; 2: 179–192
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fisher M. T. Improve your lipreading. The Volta Bureau, Washington 1968
   Google Scholar
• Fleming D. B., Rice C. G. New circuit development concepts in hearing aids. InternationalAudiology 1969; 8: 517–523
   Google Scholar
• Fletcher H., Steinberg J. C. Articulation testing methods. Bell System Technical Journal 1929; 8: 807–809
   Google Scholar
• Franks J. R., Oyer H. J. Factors influencing the identification of English sounds in lipreading. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research 1967; 10: 757–764
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• French N. R., Steinberg J. C. Intelligibility of speech sounds. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 1947; 19: 90–119
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frisina D. R. Comparison of the performance of day students and residential students in residential schools for the deaf. Proceedings 40th Convention American Instructors of the Deaf 1961; 149–1, 65.
   Google Scholar
• Frisina D. R. Speechreading. Proceedings International Congress Education of the Deaf. 1963; 191–207
   Google Scholar
• Frisina D. R., Bernero R. J. A profile of the hearing and speech of Gallaudet College students. Volta Review 1958; 60: 316–321
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fry D. B. Word and sentence tests for use in speech audiometry. Lancet 1961; 2: 197–199
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fry D. B. Coding and decoding in speech. Signs, Signals and Symbols, S. E. Mason. Methuen, London 1963
   Google Scholar
• Fry D. B. Modifications to speech audiometry. International Audiology 1964; 3: 227–236
   Google Scholar
• Fry D. B. The reception of speech. Chapter IV in. The Deaf Child by. Whetnall and Fry. William Heinemann Medical Books Ltd. 1964
   Google Scholar
• Fry D. B., Kerridge P. M. T. Hearing of speech by deaf people. Lancet 1939; 1: 106–111
   Google Scholar
• Gault R. H. The interpretation of speech by tactual and visual impression. Archives of Otolaryngology 1926; 3: 228–239
   Google Scholar
• Gault R. H. On the identification of certain vowel and consonantal elements in words by their tactual qualities and by their visual qualities as seen by the lipreader. Journal of Abnormal Psychology 1927; 22: 33–39
   Google Scholar
• Gault R. H. Interpretation of spoken language when the feel of speech supplements vision of the speaking face. Volta Review 1928; 30: 379–386
   Google Scholar
• Getz S. Environment and the deaf child. Charles C. Thomas, Springfield, Illinois 1953
   Google Scholar
• Gilliat M. E. If I were teaching children again. Teacher of the Deaf 1961; 59: 55–59
   Google Scholar
• Gilliat M. E. Suggestions for lip-reading classes for deaf adults. Teacher of the Deaf 1962; 60: 36–45
   Google Scholar
• Goldstein M. A. The acoustic method for training of the deaf and hard-of-hearing child. The Laryngoscope Press, St. Louis 1939
   Google Scholar
• Goodman A. I. Residual capacity to hear in pupils in schools for the deaf. Journal of Otology and Laryngology 1949; 63: 578–584
   Google Scholar
• Guberina P. Verbotonal method and its application to the rehabilitation of the deaf. Proceedings of International Congress of Education of the Deaf, American Instructors of the Deaf. 1963; 279–293
   Google Scholar
• Harford E., Musket C. N. Binaural hearing with one hearing aid. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders 1964; 29: 133–146
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Harold B. B. The effects of variations in intensity on the capacity of deaf children and adults to hear speech with hearing aids. University of Manchester. 1957, PhD Thesis
   Google Scholar
• Harris K. S. Cues for the discrimination of American English fricatives in spoken syllables. Language and Speech 1958; 1: 1–7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harris J. D., Haines H. L., Clack T. D. The relation between speech intelligibility and the electroacoustic characteristics of low fidelity circuitry. Journal of Auditory Research 1961; 1: 357–381
   Google Scholar
• Haskins H. L., Hardy W. G. Clinical studies in stereophonic hearing. Laryngoscope 1960; 70: 1427–1432
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Haspiel G. S. A synthetic approach to lip reading. The Expression Co, Magnolia, Mass 1964
   Google Scholar
• Hedgecock L. D., Sheets B. V. A comparison of monaural and binaural hearing aids for listening to speech. Archives of Otolaryngology 1958; 68: 624–629
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heider F. K., Heider G. M. Studies in the psychology of the deaf. Psychological Monographs 1940; 52: 124–133
   Google Scholar
• Heider F. K., Heider G. M. An experimental investigation of lipreading. Psychological Monographs 1940; 52: 124–133
   Google Scholar
• Hirsh I. J. The measurement of hearing. McGraw Hill, NY 1952
   Google Scholar
• Hirsh I. J. Perception of speech. Chapter II. Sensorineural Hearing Processes and Disorders, A. B. Graham. International Symposium, Henry Ford Hospital. 1965
   Google Scholar
• Hirsh I. J., Davis H., Silverman S. R., Reynolds E. G., Eldert E., Benson R. W. Development of materials for speech audiometry. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders 1952; 17: 321–337
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hirsh I. J., Reynolds E. G., Joseph M. Intelligibility of different speech materials. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 1954; 26: 530–538
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hodgson W., Murdock J. R. Effect of the earmould on speech intelligibility in hearing aid use. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research 1970; 13: 290–297
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hoffman H. S. Study of some cues in the perception of the voiced stop consonants. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 1958; 30: 1035–1041
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holmgren L. Can the hearing be damaged by a hearing aid?. Acta Otolaryngologica 1940; 28: 440
   Google Scholar
• Hopkins L. A. The relationship between degrees of deafness and response to acoustic training. Vo/taReview 1953; 55: 23
   Google Scholar
• House A. S., Williams C. E., Hecker M. H. L., Kryter K. D. Psycho-acoustic speech tests: a modified rhyme test. Electronics Systems Division, US Air Force, Tech. Doc. Rept. ESD-TDR-63–403., 1963
   Google Scholar
• House A. S., Williams C. E., Hecker M. H. L., Kryter K. D. Articulation-testing methods: consonantal differentiation with a closed response set. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 1965; 37: 158–166
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hovland C. I. Human learning and retention. Chapter 17 in. Handbook of Experimental Psychology, S. S. Stevens. John Wiley & Sons, NY 1953
   Google Scholar
• Hudgins C. V. A comparative study of the speech co-ordination of deaf and normal subjects. Journal of Genetic Psychology 1934; 44: 1–48
   Google Scholar
• Hudgins C. V. Auditory training: its possibilities and limitations. The Volta Review 1954; 56: 1
   Google Scholar
• Hudgins C. V., Marquis R. J., Nichols R. H., Peterson G. E., Ross D. A. The comparative performance of an experimental hearing aid and two commercial instruments. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 1948; 20: 241–258
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hudgins C. V., Numbers F. An investigation of the intelligibility of the speech of the deaf. Genetic Psychology Monographs 1942; 25: 289–392
   Google Scholar
• Hughes G., Halle M. Spectral properties of fricative consonants. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 1956; 28: 303–310
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huizing H. Auditory training. Acta Orolaryngological Supplement 1951; 100: 156–163
   Google Scholar
• Huizing H. C. Deaf mutism: modern trends in treatment and prevention. Annals Oto-Rhino-Laryngology 1959; 5: 74–106
   Google Scholar
• Hutton C. Combining auditory and visual stimuli in aural rehabilitation. Volta Review 1959; 61: 316–319
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Itard J. M. G. Traite de maladies de ľoreille et de ľaudition. 1821
   Google Scholar
• Jeffers J. Quality judgement in hearing aid selection. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders 1960; 25: 259–266
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Jerger J., Carhart R., Dirks D. Binaural hearing aids and speech intelligibility. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research 1961; 4: 137–148
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Jerger J., Dirks D. Binaural hearing aids: an enigma. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 1961; 33: 537–538
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jerger J., Speaks C., Malmquist C. Hearing aid performance and hearing aid selection. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research 1966; 9: 136–149
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• John J. E. J. Chapter 7 in. Educational Guidance and the Deaf Child, Ewing. Manchester. University Press, Manchester 1957
   Google Scholar
• John J. E. J., Howarth J. N. The effect of time distortions on the intelligibility of deaf children. Language and Speech 1965; 8: 127–134
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson E. H. Testing results of acoustic training. American Annals of the Deaf 1939; 84: 223–233
   Google Scholar
• Johnson J. C. Educating hearing-impaired children in ordinary schools. Manchester University Press, Manchester 1962
   Google Scholar
• Jordan O., Grieson O., Bentzen O. Treatment with binaural hearing aids. Archives of Otolaryngology 1967; 85: 319–326
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keith J. Has lipreading missed the bus?–Yes?. Volta Review 1943; 45: 286–288
   Google Scholar
• Kelly J. C. C/inicians's Handbook for Auditory Training. Dubuque, C. Brown & Co, Iowa 1953
   Google Scholar
• Kinney C. E. Hearing impairments in children. Laryngoscope 1953; 63: 220–226
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kinney C. E. The further destruction of partially deafened children's hearing by the use of powerful hearing aids. Annals of Otology 1961; 70: 828–835
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kinzie C. E., Kinzie R. Lip-reading for the deafened adult. John C. Winston & Co, Philadelphia 1931
   Google Scholar
• Kreul E. J., Nixon J. C., Kryter K. D., Bell D. W., Lang J. S., Schubert E. D. A proposed clinical test of speech discrimination. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research 1968; 11: 536–552
   Google Scholar
• Larr A. L. Speechreading through closed circuit television. Volta Review 1959; 61: 19–22
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lehiste I., Peterson G. E. Linguistic considerations in the study of speech intelligibility. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 1959; 31: 280–286
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levine E. Psychology and deafness. Columbia University Press, NY 1960
   Google Scholar
• Liberman A. M., Delattre P., Cooper F. S. The role of selected stimulus variables in the perception of unvoiced stop consonants. American Journal of Psychology 1952; 65: 497–503
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Licklider J. C. R. The influence of interaural phase relations upon the masking of speech by white noise. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 1948; 20: 150–159
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Littler T. S. Electrical hearing aids. Journal of Institution of Electrical Engineers 1944; 91: 67–74
   Google Scholar
• Lowell E. L. Research in speech reading: some relationships to language development and implications for the classroom teacher. Proceedings 39th Convention American Instructors Deaf. 1959; 68–75
   Google Scholar
• Lybarger S. F. The earmould as part of the receiver acoustic system. Radioear Corp, Canonsburg, Pa 1958, n.d.
   Google Scholar
• Lybarger S. F. A discussion of hearing aid trends. International Audiology 1966; 5: 376–383
   Google Scholar
• Lybarger S. F. Earmould acoustics. Audecibel 1967; 9: 19–22
   Google Scholar
• Macrae J. H. TTS and recovery from TTS after use of powerful hearing aids. Journal of Acoustical Society of America 1967; 43: 1445–1446
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Macrae J. H. Deterioration of the residual hearing of children with sensorineural deafness. Acta Otolaryngologica 1968; 66: 33–39
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Macrae J. H., Farrartt R. H. The effect of hearing aid use on the residual hearing of children with sensorineural deafness. Annals of Otology 1965; 74: 409–419
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Magner M. E. Parents can help deaf children acquire ability in speech reading. American Annals of the Deaf 1960; 105: 431
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malles I. Hearing aid effect in unilateral conductive deafness. Archives of Otolaryngology 1963; 77: 406–408
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Markides A. The hearing of deaf and partially-hearing children with special reference to intelligibility. University of Manchester. 1967, MEd Thesis
   Google Scholar
• Markides A. Do hearing aids damage the user's residual hearing?. Sound (Now Brit. J. Audiology) 1971; 5: 22–31
   Google Scholar
• Markides A. The possibility of restoring binaural hearing advantages by means of wearable hearing aids. University of Southampton. 1974, PhD Thesis
   Google Scholar
• Markle D. M., Aber W. A clinical evaluation of monaural and binaural hearing aids. AMA Archives of Otolaryngology 1958; 67: 606–608
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mason M. K. A cinematographic technique for testing visual speech comprehension. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders 1943; 8: 271
   Google Scholar
• Medical Research Council. Hearing aids and audiometers. Special Report Series No 261, HMSO, London 1947
   Google Scholar
• Milesky S. A. Testing Spreading potential. Volta Review 1960; 62: 373–375
   Google Scholar
• Miller G. A., Heise C. A., Lichten D. The intelligibility of speech as a function of the context of the test material. Journal of Experimental Psychology 1951; 41: 329–335
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mtfller T. T., Rojskjaer C. Injury to hearing through hearing aid treatment (acoustic trauma). Fifth Congress, International Society of Audiology, BonnGermany 1960
   Google Scholar
• Morkovin B. V. Rehabilitation of the aurally-handicapped through a study of speech reading in life situations. Journal of Speech Disorders 1947; 12: 363–368
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Morris D. M. A study of some of the factors involved in lipreading. Smith College 1944, MA Thesis
   Google Scholar
• Murray N. E. Hearing aids and classification of deaf children. Report CAL-IR-2, Commonwealth Acoustic Laboratories, Sydney 1951, (quoted by Macrae and Farrant).
   Google Scholar
• Myklebust H. R. The use of residual hearing in a residential school for the deaf. American Annals of the Deaf 1943; 99: 270
   Google Scholar
• Myklebust H. R. The use of individual hearing aids in a residential school for the deaf and implications for acoustic training. American Annals of the Deaf 1946; 91: 255
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Myklebust H. R. The psychology of deafness. Grune and Stratton, Inc., New York 1960
   Google Scholar
• McClellan M. E. Aided speech discrimination in noise with vented and unvented earmoulds. Journal of Auditory Research 1967; 7: 93–99
   Google Scholar
• McConnell F., Silver E. F., McDonald D. Test re-test consistency of clinical hearing aid tests. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders 1960; 25: 273–280
   Google Scholar
• McEachem A. W., Rushford G. Lipreading performance as a function of unknown communicators. John Tracy Clinic Research Papers VIII. 1958
   Google Scholar
• Naunton R. F. The effect of hearing aid use upon the user's residual hearing. Laryngoscope 1957; 67: 569–576
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Nitchie E. B. Lipreading, principles and practices. F. Stokes & Co, New York 1912
   Google Scholar
• Nitchie E. B. The use of homophenous words. Volta Review 1916; 18: 3
   Google Scholar
• Nitchie E. H. New lessons in lip reading. J. B. Lippincott & Co, Philadelphia 1960
   Google Scholar
• Numbers M. E., Hudgins C. V. Speech perception in present day education for deaf children. Volta Review 1948; 50: 449–456
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O'Connor J. C., Liberman A. M., Delattre P. C., Cooper F. S. Acoustic cues for the perception of initial /w, j, r, I/ in English. Word 1957; 13: 24–29
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olsen W. O., Carhart R. Development of test procedures for evaluation of binaural hearing aids. Bulletin of Prosthetics Research 1967; 10: 22–49
   Google Scholar
• O'Neill J. J. An exploratory investigation of lip-reading ability among normal-hearing students. Speech Monographs 1951; 18: 309–311
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O'Neill J. J. Contributions of the visual components of oral symbols to speech comprehension. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders 1954; 19: 429–439
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• O'Neill J. J., Oyer H. J. Visual communication for the hard of hearing. Prentice Hall, Englewood, Cliffs 1961
   Google Scholar
• Ordman K. A., Ralli M. P. What people say. Volta Bureau, Washington 1955
   Google Scholar
• Ordman T. Has lip reading missed the bus?–No. Volta Review 1943; 45: 288–290, 316–318.
   Google Scholar
• Overbeck J. C. van. Response to speech and music. In the Modern Educational Treatment of Deafness, Ewing. The Volta Bureau, Washington 1960
   Google Scholar
• Owens E. Intelligibility of words varying in familiarity. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research 1961; 4: 113, 129.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Paget G. The systematic sign language. Hearing 1969; 24: 75–76
   Google Scholar
• Palmer J. N. The effect of speaker differences on the intelligibility of phonetically balanced word lists. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders 1955; 20: 192–195
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Pauls M. D. Speechreading. Hearing and Deafness, Davis, Silverman. Holt, Rinehart and Winston, New York 1960
   Google Scholar
• Petrovsek M. The eyes have it. Hearing News 1961; 29: 5–9
   Google Scholar
• Pintner R. Speech and speech reading tests for the deaf. Journal of Applied Psychology 1929; 13: 220–225
   Google Scholar
• Pollack D. Acoupedics: a uni-sensory approach to auditory training. Volta Review 1964; 66: 400–409
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Poulos T. H. Acuity and perceptive accuracy of monaural and binaural hearing. Volta Review 1950; 52: 314–316
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prall J. Lipreading and hearing aids combine for better information. Volta Review 1957; 59: 64–65
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Redell R. C., Calvert D. R. Selecting a hearing aid by interpreting audiological data. Journal of Auditory Research 1966; 6: 445–452
   Google Scholar
• Reid G. A. A preliminary investigation in the testing of lip reading achievement. American Annals oftheDeaf 1946; 91: 403–413
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Rice C. G. Hearing aid design criteria. International Audiology 1965; 4: 130–134
   Google Scholar
• Roberts C. Can hearing aids damage hearing?. Acta Otolaryngologica 1970; 69: 123–125
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Rosenzweig M. R., Postman L. Frequency of usage and the perception of words. Science 1958; 127: 263–266
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ross M., Lerman J. Hearing aid usage and its effect on residual hearing: a review of the literature and an investigation. Archives of Otolaryngology 1967; 86: 639–644
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sanders D. A. A follow up of fifty deaf children who received preschool training. University of Manchester. 1961, Uppublished PhD Thesis
   Google Scholar
• Sanders D. A. Aural rehabilitation. Prentice-Hall Inc, Englewood Cliffs 1971
   Google Scholar
• Sarrail S. Basic percentage of error in lip reading. Otolaryngology 1951; 2: 271–277, (Buenos Aires)
   Google Scholar
• Sataloff J. Pitfalls in routine hearing testing. Archives of Otolaryngology 1961; 73: 717–726
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwartz J. R., Black J. W. Some effects of sentence structure on speech-reading. Central States Speech Journal 1967; 18: 86–90
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shannon C. E. A mathematical theory of communication. Bell System Technical Journal 1948; 27: 379–423, 623–656.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sheridan M. D. The child's hearing for speech. Methuen & Co., London 1948
   Google Scholar
• Shore I., Bilger R. C., Hirsh I. J. Hearing aid evaluation: reliability of repeated measurement. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders 1960; 25: 152–1, 70.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Shore J., Kramer J. C. A comparison of two procedures for hearing aid selection. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders 1963; 28: 159–170
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Silverman S. R. Tolerance for pure tones and speech in normal and defective hearing. Annals of Otology, Rhinology and Laryngology 1947; 56: 658–677
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Silverman S. R., Hirsh I. Problems related to the use of speech in clinical audiometry. Annals of Otology, Rhinology and Laryngology 1955; 64: 1234–1244
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Simmons A. A. Factors related to lipreading. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research 1959; 2: 340–352
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Soret C. US Patent Office, Patent No. 1,154,069, 1915, Audiphone.
   Google Scholar
• Speaks C., Jerger J. Method for measurement of speech identification. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research 1965; 8: 185–194
   Google Scholar
• Stevens K. N., House A. S. Development of a quantitative description of vowel articulation. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 1955; 27: 484–493
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stevens P. Spectre of fricative noise in human speech. Language and Speech 1960; 3: 32–49
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Story A. J. Speech-reading and speech for the deaf. Hill and Ainsworth Ltd. 1915, Stoke on Trent.
   Google Scholar
• Stowell A., Samuelson E. E., Lehman A. Lip reading for the deafened child. Macmillan, New York 1928
   Google Scholar
• Taaffe G., Wong W. Studies of variables in lip reading stimulus materials. John Tracy Clinic Research Papers, III. 1957
   Google Scholar
• Tillman T. W., Carhart R., Wilber L. A test for speech discrimination composed of CNC monosyllabic words. USAF School Aerospace Medicine Reports 62–135., 1963
   Google Scholar
• Ulrich J. H. An experimental study of the acquisition of information from three types of recorded television presentations. Speech Monographs 1957; 24: 39–45
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Upton H. W. Wearable eyeglass speechreading aid. American Annals of the Deaf 1968; 113: 222–229
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Urbantschitsch V. On the value of methodological exercises in hearing. The Association Review 1904; 6: 48–52
   Google Scholar
• Utley J. A test of lip reading ability. Journal of Speech Disorders 1946; 11: 109–116
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Van Uden A. A sound-perceptive method. The Modern Educational Treatment of Deafness, Ewing. Volta Bureau, Washington 1960
   Google Scholar
• Van Uden A. New realisations in the light of the pure oral method. Volta Review 1970; 72: 524–537
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vernon M. D. The psychology of perception. Penguin Books. MiddlesexEngland 1962
   Google Scholar
• Vernon M., Mindel E. D. Psychological and psychiatric aspects of profound hearing loss. Audiological Assessment, D. E. Rose. Prentice-Hall Inc, Englewood, Cliffs 1971
   Google Scholar
• Watson T. J. The use of hearing aids with severely deaf children. Archives of Otolaryngology 1956; 64: 151–156
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Watson T. J. Speech audiometry in children. Educational Guidance and the Deaf Child, A. W. C. Ewing. Manchester University Press. 1957
   Google Scholar
• Watson T. J. The use of hearing aids by hearing impaired pupils n ordinary schools. Volta Review 1964; 66: 741–787
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Watson T. J. The education of hearing-handicapped children. University of London Press Ltd. 1967
   Google Scholar
• Watson T. J. Hearing aids. Chapter 18 in. Scott-Brown's Diseases of the Ear, Nose and Throat. Ballantyne and Groves, Butterworth, London 1970
   Google Scholar
• Wedenberg E. Auditory training of deaf and hard of hearing children. Acta Otolaryngologica 1951; 94: 130
   Google Scholar
• Wedenberg E. Auditory training of severely hard of hearing pre-school children. Acta-Otolaryngologica 1954, Supplement 110.
   Google Scholar
• Whetnall E. Binaural hearing. Journal of Laryngology and Otology 1964; 78: 1079–1089
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Whitehurst M. W. Integration of auditory training and lipreading. Volta Review 1964; 66: 730–733
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Witter H. L., Goldstein D. P. Quality judgements of hearing aid transduced speech. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research 1971; 14: 312–322
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wood K. S., Blakely R. W. The association of lipreading and the ability to understand distorted speech. Western Speech 1953; 17: 259–261
   Google Scholar
• Woodward M. F., Lowell E. E. A linguistic approach to the education of aurally-handicapped children. Education and Welfare Project 907., United States Dept. of Health. 1964
   Google Scholar
• World Health Organisation. The early detection and treatment of handicapping defects in young children. Special report distributerd by Regional Office for Europe, Copenhagen., 1967
   Google Scholar
• Wright H. N., Carhart R. The efficiency of binaural hearing among the hearing impaired. AMA Archieves of Otolaryngology 1960; 72: 789–797
   Google Scholar