Ipsilateral suppression effects on transient evoked otoacoustic emission

References

• Avan P, Bonfils P, Loth D, Narcy Ph, Trotoux J. Quantitative assessment of human cochlear function by evoked otoacoustic emissions. Hear Res 1991; 52: 99–112
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berlin C I, Hood L J, Hurley A, Wen H, Kemp D. Bilateral and ipsilateral forward masking and TEOAE suppression. Abstracts of the XVII Midwinter Research Meeting, G R Popelka. St. Petersburg Beach, ARO, Florida 1994; 52
   Google Scholar
• Bray P, Kemp D T. An advanced cochlear echo suitable for infant screening. Br J Audiol 1987; 21: 191–204
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Brownell W E. Outer hair cell electromotility and otoacoustic emissions. Ear Hear 1990; 11: 82–92
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Collet L. Use of otoacoustic emissions to explore the medial olivocochlear system in humans. Br J Audiol 1993; 27: 155–9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dallos P. Response characteristics of mammalian cochlear hair cells. J Neurosci 1985; 5: 1591–1608
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dallos P. The active cochlea. J. Neurosci 1992; 12: 4575–85
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elberling C, Parbo J, Johnsen N J, Bagi P. Evoked acoustic emissions: clinical application. Acta Oto-Laryngol Suppl 1985; 421: 77–85
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Grandori F. Non-linear phenomena in click- and tone burst-evoked otoacoustic emissions. Audiology 1985; 24: 71–80
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Grandori F, Ravazzani P. Non-linearities of click-evoked otoacoustic emissions and the derived nonlinear technique. Br J Audiol 1993; 27: 97–102
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hauser R, Probst R, Lohle E. Click- and tone burst-evoked otoacoustic emissions in normally hearing ears and in ears with high-frequency sensorineural hearing loss. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 1991; 248: 345–52
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kemp D T, Chum R A. Properties of the generator of stimulated acoustic emissions. Hear Res 1980; 2: 213–32
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kemp D T. Towards a model for the origin of cochlear echoes. Hear Res 1980; 2: 533–48
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kemp D T, Bray P, Alexander L, Brown A M. Acoustic emission cochleography: practical aspects. Cochlear mechanics and otoacoustic emissions, G Cian-frone, F ed. Grandori. Scand Audiol. 1986; 71–95, (Suppl. 25)
   Google Scholar
• Korn A, Gkorn TM. Mathematical Handbook. McGraw-Hill Book Co., New York 1968
   Google Scholar
• Kossl M, Russell I J. The phase and magnitude of hair cell receptor potentials and frequency tuning in guinea pig cochlea. J Neurosci 1992; 12: 1575–86
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kubo T, Sakashita T, Hachikawa K, Minowa Y, Nakai Y. Frequency analysis of evoked otoacoustic emissions. Acta OtoLaryngol (Suppl.) 1991; 486: 73–7
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Liberman M C, Brown M C. Physiology and anatomy of single olivocochlear neurons in the cat. Hear Res 1986; 24: 17–36
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liberman M C. Rapid assessment of sound-evoked olivocochlear feedback: suppression of compound action potentials by contralateral sound. Hear Res 1989; 38: 47–56
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lonsbury-Martin B L, Martin G K, Probst R, Coats A C. Spontaneous otoacoustic emissions in nonhuman primate. II. Cochlear anatomy. Hear Res 1988; 33: 69–94
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin G K, Lonsbury-Martin B L, Probst R, Coats A C. Spontaneous otoacoustic emissions in a non-human primate. I. Basic features and relations to other emissions. Hear Res 1988; 33: 49–68
   Google Scholar
• Norton S J, Neely S T. Tone-burst-evoked otoacoustic emissions from normal-hearing subjects. J Acoust Soc Am 1987; 81: 1860–72
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Probst R, Coats A C, Martin G K, Lonsbury-Martin B L. Spontaneous, click-, and tone burst-evoked otoacoustic emissions from normal ears. Hear Res 1986; 21: 261–75
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Probst R. Otoacoustic emissions: An overview. New aspects of cochlear mechanics and inner ear pathophysiology. Adv. Otorhinolaryngol, CR. Pfaltz. Karger, Basel 1990; Vol. 44: 1–91
   Google Scholar
• Rajan R. Functions of the efferent pathways to the mammalian cochlea. Information processing in mammalian auditory and tactile systems, M Rowe, L. Aitkin. Wiley Liss, New York 1990; 81–96
   Google Scholar
• Tavartkiladze G A, Frolenkov G I, Kruglov A V. Delayed evoked otoacoustic emission and mechanisms of its generation. Sensory Systems 1993; 7: 85–99
   Google Scholar
• Veuillet E, Collet L, Duclaux R. Effect of contralateral acoustic stimulation on active cochlear micro-mechanical properties in human subjects: dependence on stimulus variables. J Neurophysiol 1991; 65: 724–35
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Veuillet E, Collet L, Morgon A. Differential effects of ear-canal pressure and contralateral acoustic stimulation on evoked otoacoustic emissions in humans. Hear Res 1992; 61: 47–55
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson J P. Evidence for a cochlear origin for acoustic re-emissions threshold fine-structure and tonal tinnitus. Hear Res 1980; 2: 233–52
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson JP, Sutton G J. Acoustic correlates of tonal tinnitus. Tinnitus. Ciba Foundation symposium. Pitman Books Ltd., London 1981; 82–107
   Google Scholar
• Zurek P M. Spontaneous narrowband acoustic signals emitted by human ears. J Acoust Soc Am 1981; 69: 514–23
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar