Multiscale imaging of bone microdamage

References

• Knudtson M. Osteoporosis: background and overview. J Nurse Pract 2009;5:S4–12
   Google Scholar
• Bonnick SL, Shulman L. Monitoring osteoporosis therapy: bone mineral density, bone turnover markers, or both? Am J Med 2006;119:S25–31
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hui S, Slemenda CW, Johnston CC. Age and bone mass as predictors of fracture in a prospective study. J Clin Invest 1988;81:1804–9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hernandez CJ, Keaveny TM. A biomechanical perspective on bone quality. Bone 2006;39:1173–81
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schaffler MB, Choi K, Milgrom C. Aging and matrix microdamage accumulation in human compact bone. Bone 1995;17:521–5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Norman TL, Wang Z. Microdamage of human cortical bone: incidence and morphology in long bones. Bone 1997;20:375–9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Diab T, Vashishth D. Effects of damage morphology on cortical bone fragility. Bone 2005;37:96–102
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zioupos P, Currey JD. The extent of microcracking and the morphology of microcracks in damaged bone. J Mater Sci 1994;29:978–86
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Traub W, Weiner S. Bone structure: from angstroms to microns. FASEB J 1992;6:879–85
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fantner GE, Hassenkam T, Kindt JH, Weaver JC, Birkedal H, Pechenik L, Cutroni JA, Cidade GAG, Stucky GD, Morse DE, Hansma PK. Sacrificial bonds and hidden length dissipate energy as mineralized fibrils separate during bone fracture. Nature Mater 2005;4:612–16
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fantner GE, Oroudjev E, Schitter G, Golde LS, Thurner P, Finch MM, Turner P, Gutsmann T, Morse DE, Hansma H, Hansma PK. Sacrificial bonds and hidden length: unraveling molecular mesostructures in tough materials. Biophys J 2006;90:1411
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fantner GE, Adams J, Turner P, Thurner PJ, Fisher LW, Hansma PK. Nanoscale ion mediated networks in bone: osteopontin can repeatedly dissipate large amounts of energy. Nano Lett 2007;7:2491–8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hansma P, Fantner G, Kindt J, Thurner P, Schitter G, Turner P, Udwin S, Finch M. Sacrificial bonds in the interfibrillar matrix of bone. J Musculoskeletal Neuronal Interact 2005;5:313–15
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Poundarik AP, Diab T, Sroga GE, Ural A, Boskey AL, Gundberg CM, Vashishth D. Dilatational band formation in bone. Proc Natl Acad Sci 2012;109:19178–83
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gupta HS, Wagermaier W, Zickler GA, Raz-Ben Aroush D, Funari SS, Roschger P, Wagner HD, Fratzl P. Nanoscale deformation mechanisms in bone. Nano Lett 2005;5:2108–11
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wenzel TE, Schaffler MB, Fyhrie DP. In vivo trabecular microcracks in human vertebral bone. Bone 1996;19:89–95
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schaffler MB, Choi K, Milgrom C. Aging and matrix microdamage accumulation in human compact bone. Bone 1995;17:521–5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Norman TL, Wang Z. Microdamage of human cortical bone: incidence and morphology in long bones. Bone;1997;20:375–9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frost HM. Presence of microscopic cracks in vivo in bone H Ford Hos Med Bull 1960;8:25–35
   Google Scholar
• Vashishth D, Tanner KE, Bonfield W. Experimental validation of a crack propagation mechanism in cortical bone. J Biomech 2003;36:121–4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Diab T, Condon KW, Burr DB, Vashishth D. Age-related change in the damage morphology in human cortical bone and its role in bone fragility. Bone 2006;38:427–31
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vashishth DJ, Koontz Qiu S, Cannon-Lundin D, Yeni YN, Schaffler MB, Fyhrie DP. In vivo diffuse damage in human trabecular bone. Bone 2000;26:147–52
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Diab T, Vashishth D. Morphology, localization and accumulation of in vivo microdamage in human cortical bone. Bone 2007;40:612–18
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nalla RK, Kruzic JJ, Ritchie RO. On the origin of the toughness of mineralized tissue: microcracking or crack bridging? Bone 2004;34:790–8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nalla RK, Stolken JS, Kinney JH, Ritchie RO. Fracture in human cortical bone: local fracture criteria and toughening mechanisms. J Biomech 2005;38:1517–25
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nalla RK, Kinney JH, Ritchie RO. Mechanistic fracture criteria for the failure of human cortical bone. Nature Mater 2003;2:164–8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hiller LP, Stover SM, Gibson VA, Gibeling JC, Prater CS, Hazelwood SJ, Yeh OC, Martin RB. Osteon pullout in the equine third metacarpal bone: effects of ex-vivo fatigue. J Orthop Res 2003;21:481–8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vashishth D, Tanner KE, Bonfield W. Contribution, development and morphology of microcracking in cortical bone during crack propagation. J Biomech 2000;33:1169–74
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mohsin S, O’Brien FJ, Lee TC. Osteonal crack barriers in ovine compact bone. J Anat 2006;208:81–9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matheson GO, Clemen DB, McKenzie DC, Tauntan JE, Lloyd-Smith DR, MacIntgre JG. Stress fractures in athletes: a study of 320 cases. Am J Sports Med 1985;13:342–8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meurman KAO, Elfving S. Stress fracture in soldiers: a multifocal bone disorder. Radiology 1980;134:483–7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Daffner RH, Pavlov H. Stress fractures: current concepts. Am J Roentgen 1992;159:245–52
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frost HM. Bone remodeling and its relationship to metabolic bone diseases. Springfield (IL): Charles C. Thomas; 1973
   Google Scholar
• Martin RB, Burr DB. Structure, function and adaptation of compact bone. New York (NY): Raven Press; 1989
   Google Scholar
• Mori S, Burr DB. Increased intracortical remodeling following fatigue damage. Bone 1993;14:103–9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bentolila V, Boyce TM, Fyhrie DP, Drumb R, Skerry TM, Schaffler MB. Intracortical remodelling in adult rat long bones after fatigue loading. Bone 1998;23:275–81
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burr DB. Damage detection and behaviour in bone. In: Prendergast PJ, Lee TC, Carr AJ, eds. Proceedings of the 12th Conference of the European Society of Biomechanics. Dublin: Royal Academy of Medicine in Ireland. 2000:38–9
   Google Scholar
• Lee TC, Staines A, Taylor D. Bone adaptation to load: microdamage as a stimulus for bone remodelling. J Anat 2002;201:437–46
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verborgt O, Gibson GJ, Schaffler MB. Loss of osteocyte integrity in association with microdamage and bone remodelling after fatifue in vivo. J Bone Miner 2000;15:60–7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cardoso L, Herman BC, Verborgt O, Laudier D, Majeska RJ, Schaffler MB. Osteocyte apoptosis controls activation of intracortical resorption in response to bone fatigue. Am Soc Bone Mineral Res 2009;2:597–5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kennedy OD, Herman BC, Laudier DM, Majeska RJ, Sun HB, Schaffler MB. Activation of resorption in fatigue-oaded bone involves both apoptosis and active pro-steoclastogenic signaling by distinct osteocyte populations. Bone 2012;50:1115–22
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fondrk M, Bahniuk E, Davy DT, Michaels C. Some viscoplastic charactercteristics of bovine and human cortical bone. J Biomech 1988;21:623–30
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keaveny TM, Wachtel EF, Guo XE, Hayes WC. Mechanical behavior of damaged trabecular bone. J Biomechanics 1994;27:1309–18
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee TC, Mohsin S, Taylor D, Parkesh T, Gunnlaugsson T, O’Brien FJ, Giehl M, Gowin W. Detecting microdamage in bone. J Anat 2003;203:161–72
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rost FWD. Fluorescence microscopy. II. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1995
   Google Scholar
• Burr DB, Stafford T. Validity of the bulk-staining technique to separate artifactual from in vivo bone microdamage. Clin Orthop 1990;260:305–8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burr DB, Martin RB, Schaffler MB, Radin EL. Bone remodelling in response to in vivo fatigue microdamage. J Biomech 1985;18:189–200
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vashishth D, Johnson C, Clovis N, Tanner KE, Bonfield W. Double staining technique for histological evaluation of microcracks in cortical bone. Proc 2nd World Cong Biomech 1994;I:44
   Google Scholar
• Vashishth D. Hierarchy of bone microdamage at multiple length. Int J Fatigue 2007;29:1024–33
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vashishth D, Behiri JC, Bonfield W. Crack growth resistance in cortical bone: concept of microcrack toughening. J Biomech 1997;30:763–9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seref-Ferlengez Z, Basta-Pljakic J, Kennedy Oran D, Philemon Claudy J, Schaffler Mitchell B. Structural and mechanical repair of diffuse damage in cortical bone in vivo. J Bone Miner Res 2014;29:2537–44
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frost HM, Villanueva AR, Roth H, Stanisavljevic S. Tetracycline bone labeling. J New Drugs 1961;1:206–16
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Frost HM. Tetracycline-based analysis of bone remodelling. Calcif Tissue Res 1969;3:211–37
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lee TC, Arthur TL, Gibson LJ, Hayes WC. Sequential labelling of microdamage in bone using chelating agents. J Orthop Res 2000;18:322–5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O'Brien FJ, Taylor D, Lee TC. An improved labelling technique for monitoring microcrack growth in compact bone. J Biomech 2002;35:523–6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parkesh R, Mohsin S, Lee TC, Gunnlaugsson T. Histological, spectroscopic, and surface analysis of microdamage in bone: toward real-time analysis using fluorescent sensors. Chem Mater 2007;19:1656–63
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parkesh R, Lee TC, Gunnlaugsson T. Fluorescence imaging of bone cracks (microdamage) using visibly emitting 1,8-naphthalimide-based PET sensors. Tetrahedron Lett 2009;50:4114–16
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stover SM, Marti RB, Pool RR, Taylor KT, Harrington TM. In vivo labeling of microdamage in cortical bone tissue. Proc Orthop Res Soc 1993;18:541
   Google Scholar
• O’Brien FJ, Taylor D, Lee TC. The effect of bone microstructure on the initiation and growth of microcracks. J Orthop Res 2005;23:475–80
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kazakia GJ, Lee JJ, Singh M, Bigley RF, Martin RB, Keaveny TM. Automated high-resolution three-dimensional fluorescence imaging of large biological specimens. J Microsc 2007;225:109–17
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Slyfield Jr CR, Niemeyer KE, Tkachenko EV, Tomlinson RE, Steyer GG, Patthanacharoenphon CG, Kazakia GJ, Wilson DL, Hernandez CJ. Three-dimensional surface texture visualization of bone tissue through epifluorescence-based serial block face imaging. J Microsc 2009;236:52–9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boyde A, Vesely P, Gray C, Jones SJ. High temporal and spatial resolution studies of bone cells sing real-time confocal reflection microscopy. Scanning 1994;16:285–94
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zarrinkalam KH, Kuliwaba JS, Martin RB, Wallwork MA, Fazzalari NL. New insights into the propagation of fatigue damage in cortical bone using confocal microscopy and chelating fluorochromes. Eur J Morphol 2005;42:81–90
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Rahn BA. Polychrome fluorescence labelling of bone formation, instrumental aspects and experimental use. Zeiss Information 1977;22:36–9
   Google Scholar
• Zioupos P. Accumulation of in-vivo fatigue microdamage and its relation to biomechanical properties in ageing human cortical bone. J Microsc 2001;201:270–8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reilly GC, Currey JD. The effects of damage and microcracking on the impact strength of bone. J Biomech 2000;33:337–43
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boyce TM, Fyhrie DP, Glotkowski MC, Radin EL, Schaffler MB. Damage type and strain mode associations in human compact bone bending fatigue. J Orthop Res 1998;16:322–9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O'Brien FJ, Taylor D, Dickson GR, Lee TC. Visualisation of three dimensional microcracks in compact bone. J Anat 2000;197:413–20
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor D, Lee TC. Measuring the shape and size of microcracks in bone. J Biomech 1998;31:1177–80
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang L, Ye T, Deng L, Shao J, Qi J, Zhou Q, Wei L, Qiu S. Repair of microdamage in osteonal cortical bone adjacent to bone screw. PLoS ONE 2014;9:e89343
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kerschnitzki M, Wagermaier W, Roschger P, Seto J, Shahar R, Duda GN, Mundlos S, Fratzl P. The organization of the osteocyte network mirrors the extracellular matrix orientation in bone. J Struct Biol 2011;173:303–11
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leng H, VanDersarl JJ, Niebur GL, Roeder RK. Microdamage in bovine cortical bone measured using micro-computed tomography. Trans Orthop Res Soc 2005;30:665
   Google Scholar
• Tang SY, Vashishth D. A non-invasive in vitro technique for the three-dimensional quantification of microdamage in trabecular bone. Bone 2007;40:1259–64
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leng H, Wang X, Ross RD, Niebur GL, Roeder RK. Micro-computed tomography of fatigue microdamage in cortical bone using a barium sulfate contrast agent. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater 2008;1:68–75
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang X, Masse DB, Leng H, Hess KP, Ross RD, Roeder RK, Niebur GL. Detection of trabecular bone microdamage by micro-computed tomography. J Biomech 2007;40:3397–403
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turnbull TL, Gargac JA, Niebur GL, Roeder RK. Detection of fatigue microdamage in whole rat femora using contrast-enhanced micro-computed tomography. J Biomech 2011;44:2395–400
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parkesh R, Lee TC, Gunnlaugsson T, Gowin W. Microdamage in bone: surface analysis and radiological detection. J Biomech 2006;39:1552–6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Silva MJ, Uthgenannt BA, Rutlin JR, Wohl GR, Lewis JS, Welch MJ. In vivo skeletal imaging of 18F-fluoride with positron emission tomography reveals damage- and time-dependent responses to fatigue loading in the rat ulna. Bone 2006;39:229–36
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li J, Miller MA, Hutchins GD, Burr DB. Imaging bone microdamage in vivo with positron emission tomography. Bone 2005;37:819–24
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldstein JI, Newbury DE, Echlin P, Joy DC, Fiori C, Lifshin E. Scanning electron microscopy and X-ray microanalysis. New York: Plenum Press; 1981
   Google Scholar
• Tang SY, Vashishth D. Non-enzymatic glycation alters microdamage formation in human cancellous bone. Bone 2010;46:148–54
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karim L, Vashishth D. Heterogeneous glycation of cancellous bone and its association with bone quality and fragility. PLoS ONE 2012;7:e35047
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brock GR, Kim G, Ingraffea AR, Andrews JC, Pianetta P, van der Meulen MCH. Nanoscale examination of microdamage in sheep cortical bone using synchrotron radiation transmission X-ray microscopy. PLoS One 2013;8:e57942
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schaffler MB, Pitchford W, Choi K, Riddle JM. Examination of compact bone microdamage using back-scattered electron microscopy. Bone 1994;15:483–8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wise LM, Wang Z, Grynpas MD. The use of fractography to supplement analysis of bone mechanical properties in different strains of mice. Bone 2007;41:620–30
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• George WT, Vashishth D. Damage mechanisms and failure modes of cortical bone under components of physiological loading. J Orthop Res 2005;23:1047–53
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braidotti P, Branca SP, Stagni L. Scanning electron microscopy of human cortical bone failure surfaces. J Biomech 1997;30:155–62
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braidotti P, Bemporad E, D’Alessio T, Sciuto SA, Stagni L. Tensile experiments and SEM fractography on bovine subchondral bone. J Biomech 2000;33:1153–7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yeni YN, Norman TL. Calculation of porosity and osteonal cement line effects on the effective fracture toughness of cortical bone in longitudinal crack growth. J Biomed Mater Res 2000;51:504–9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thurner PJ, Oroudjev E, Jungmann R, Kreutz C, Kindt JH, Schitter G, Okouneva TO, Lauer ME, Fantner GE, Hansma H, Hansma PK. Imaging of bone ultrastructure using atomic force microscopy. In: Méndez-Vilas A, Díaz J, editors. Modern research and educational topics in microscopy (Microscopy Book Series 3). Spain: Formatex; 2007:37–48
   Google Scholar
• Hassenkam T, Fantner GE, Cutroni JA, Weaver JC, Morse DE, Hansma PK. High-resolution AFM imaging of intact and fractured trabecular bone. Bone 2004;35:4–10
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thompson JB, Kindt JH, Drake B, Hansma HG, Morse DE, Hansma PK. Bone indentation recovery time correlates with bond reforming time. Nature 2001;414:773–6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nicolella DP, Moravits DE, Siller-Jackson AJ, Railsback RJ, Timmons SF, Jepsen KJ, Davy DT, Lankford J. Ultrastructural characterization of damaged cortical bone using atomic force microscopy. ASME-BED 1999;42:319–20
   Google Scholar
• Diab T, Sit S, Kim D, Rho J, Vashishth D. Age-dependent fatigue behaviour of human cortical bone. Eur J Morphol 2005;42:53–9
   PubMedGoogle Scholar