Advanced search
Publication Cover
Upsala Journal of Medical Sciences Volume 119, 2014 - Issue 4
Journal homepage
774
Views
3
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Article

Patients’ experience of outsourcing and care related to magnetic resonance examinations

Parvin Tavakol OlofssonDepartment of Clinical Science, Intervention and Technology at Karolinska Institutet, Division of Medical Imaging and Technology, Stockholm, SwedenCorrespondence[email protected]
,
Peter AspelinDepartment of Clinical Science, Intervention and Technology at Karolinska Institutet, Division of Medical Imaging and Technology, Stockholm, Sweden
,
Lott BergstrandDepartment of Radiology, Ersta Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
&
Lennart BlomqvistDepartment of Radiology, Karolinska University Hospital in Solna, Stockholm, Sweden
Pages 343-349 | Received 22 Apr 2014, Accepted 29 Jul 2014, Published online: 21 Aug 2014

References

  • Sutton R, Kanal E, Wilkoff BL, Bello D, Luechinger R, Jenniskens I, et al. Safety of magnetic resonance imaging of patients with a new Medtronic EnRhythm MRI SureScan pacing system: clinical study design. Trials. 2008;9:68.
  • Götte MJ, Rüssel IK, de Roest GJ, Germans T, Veldkamp RF, Knaapen P, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging, pacemakers and implantable cardioverter-defibrillators: current situation and clinical perspective. Neth Heart J. 2010;18:31–7.
  • The Royal College of Radiologists. Teleradiology and outsourcing census. London: The Royal College of Radiologists; 2010. Available at http://www.rcr.ac.uk/docs/radiology/pdf/BFCR(10)8_Teleradiology_census.pdf. Accessed 9 Apr 2012.
  • Kirk SA, Reid WJ. Science and social work: a critical appraisal. New York: Columbia University Press; 2002.
  • Wilde-Larsson B, Larsson G. Development of a short form of the Quality from the Patient’s Perspective (QPP) questionnaire. J Clin Nurs. 2002;11:681–7.
  • Morgan DL. Qualitative content analysis: a guide to paths not taken. Qual Health Res. 1993;3:112–21.
  • Mossholder KW, Settoon RP, Harris SG, Armenakis AA. Measuring emotion in open-ended survey responses: an application of textual data analysis. J Manage. 1995;21:335–55.
  • Ende J, Kazis L, Ash A, Moskowitz MA. Measuring patients’ desire for autonomy: decision-making and information-seeking preferences among medical patients. J Gen Intern Med. 1989;4:23–30.
  • Margulis AR, Sostman HD. Radiologist-patient contact during the performance of cross-sectional examinations. J Am Coll Radiol. 2004;1:162–3.
  • Shikiar R, Rentz AM. Satisfaction with medication: an overview of conceptual, methodological, and regulatory issues. Value Health. 2004;7:204–15.
  • Auquier P, Pernoud N, Bruder N, Simeoni MC, Auffray JP, Colavolpe C, et al. Development and validation of a perioperative satisfaction questionnaire. Anesthesiology. 2005;102:1116–23.
  • Scardina SA. SERVQUAL: a tool for evaluating patient satisfaction with nursing care. J Nurs Care Qual. 1994;8:38–46.
  • Johnson RB, Onwuegbuzie AJ. Mixed methods research: a research paradigm whose time has come. Educ Res. 2004;33:14–26.
  • Kinnersley P, Egbunike JN, Kelly M, Hood K, Owen-Jones E, Button LA, et al. The need to improve the interface between in-hours and out-of-hours GP care, and between out-of-hours care and self-care. Fam Pract. 2010;27:664–72.
  • Camponovo EJ. Radiologist-patient contact: a different perspective. J Am Coll Radiol. 2004;12:998–9. author reply 1000 Comment on Radiologist-patient contact during the performance of cross-sectional examinations. J Am Coll Radiol. 2004.

Related research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.