The use of complementary and alternative medicine in outpatients with inflammatory rheumatic diseases in Sweden

References

• National Center for Complementary and Alternative Medicine NIH. What is CAM?, Available online at: http://nccam.nih.gov/health/whatiscam/, accessed 20 May 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Eklof, M, Tegern, G, Eriksson, Bp. Stockholmare och den komplementära medicinen, In, Tema Hälsa och samhälle Lu. 2001.
   Google Scholar
• Breuer GS, Orbach H, Elkayam O, Berkun Y, Paran D, Mates M, et al. Use of complementary and alternative medicine among patients attending rheumatology clinics in Israel. Isr Med Assoc J 2006; 8: 184–7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buchbinder R, Gingold M, Hall S, Cohen M. Non-prescription complementary treatments used by rheumatoid arthritis patients attending a community-based rheumatology practice. Intern Med J 2002; 32: 208–14
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chatfield SM, Dharmage SC, Boers A, Martin BJ, Buchanan RR, Maksymowych WP, et al. Complementary and alternative medicines in ankylosing spondylitis: a cross-sectional study. Clin Rheumatol 2009; 28: 213–17
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Fautrel B, Adam V, St-Pierre Y, Joseph L, Clarke AE, Penrod JR. Use of complementary and alternative therapies by patients self-reporting arthritis or rheumatism: results from a nationwide Canadian survey. J Rheumatol 2002; 29: 2435–41
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hallert E, Husberg M, Jonsson D, Skogh T. Rheumatoid arthritis is already expensive during the first year of the disease (the Swedish TIRA project). Rheumatology (Oxford) 2004; 43: 1374–82
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kajiyama H, Akama H, Yamanaka H, Shoji A, Matsuda Y, Tanaka E, et al. One third of Japanese patients with rheumatoid arthritis use complementary and alternative medicine. Mod Rheumatol 2006; 16: 355–9
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Rao JK, Kroenke K, Mihaliak KA, Grambow SC, Weinberger M. Rheumatology patients’ use of complementary therapies: results from a one-year longitudinal study. Arthritis Rheum 2003; 49: 619–25
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rao JK, Mihaliak K, Kroenke K, Bradley J, Tierney WM, Weinberger M. Use of complementary therapies for arthritis among patients of rheumatologists. Ann Intern Med 1999; 131: 409–16
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fakta och röster om alternativmedicin: en rapport från alternativmedicinska komitten, In. Stockholm 1997, Allmänna förlaget.
   Google Scholar
• Ernst E. Musculoskeletal conditions and complementary/alternative medicine. Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol 2004; 18: 539–56
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wallerstedt, SM, Skrtic, S. [Use of natural remedies is seldom documented in medical records. There is a risk of overlooked interactions and adverse effects, as a point prevalence study shows], in Swedish. Lakartidningen. 2005;102:3220–2.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ekdahl C, Eberhardt K, Andersson SI, Svensson B. Assessing disability in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Use of a Swedish version of the Stanford Health Assessment Questionnaire. Scand J Rheumatol 1988; 17: 263–71
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fries JF, Spitz P, Kraines RG, Holman HR. Measurement of patient outcome in arthritis. Arthritis Rheum 1980; 23: 137–45
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller MD, Ferris DG. Measurement of subjective phenomena in primary care research: the Visual Analogue Scale. Fam Pract Res J 1993; 13: 15–24
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• McHorney CA, Ware JE, Jr, Lu JF, Sherbourne CD. The MOS 36-item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36): III. Tests of data quality, scaling assumptions, and reliability across diverse patient groups. Med Care 1994; 32: 40–66
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ware JE, Jr, Sherbourne CD. The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36). I. Conceptual framework and item selection. Med Care 1992; 30: 473–83
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Persson LO, Karlsson J, Bengtsson C, Steen B, Sullivan M. The Swedish SF-36 Health Survey II. Evaluation of clinical validity: results from population studies of elderly and women in Gothenborg. J Clin Epidemiol 1998; 51: 1095–103
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smets EM, Garssen B, Bonke B, De Haes JC. The Multidimensional Fatigue Inventory (MFI) psychometric qualities of an instrument to assess fatigue. J Psychosom Res 1995; 39: 315–25
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Furst CJ, Ahsberg E. Dimensions of fatigue during radiotherapy. An application of the Multidimensional Fatigue Inventory. Support Care Cancer 2001; 9: 355–60
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nicassio PM, Schuman C, Kim J, Cordova A, Weisman MH. Psychosocial factors associated with complementary treatment use in fibromyalgia. J Rheumatol 1997; 24: 2008–13
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herman CJ, Allen P, Hunt WC, Prasad A, Brady TJ. Use of complementary therapies among primary care clinic patients with arthritis. Prev Chronic Dis 2004; 1: A12
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Fleming S, Rabago DP, Mundt MP, Fleming MF. CAM therapies among primary care patients using opioid therapy for chronic pain. BMC Complement Altern Med 2007; 7: 15
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Breuer GS, Orbach H, Elkayam O, Berkun Y, Paran D, Mates M, et al. Perceived efficacy among patients of various methods of complementary alternative medicine for rheumatologic diseases. Clin Exp Rheumatol 2005; 23: 693–6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ernst E. The risk–benefit profile of commonly used herbal therapies: Ginkgo, St. John's Wort, Ginseng, Echinacea, Saw Palmetto, and Kava. Ann Intern Med 2002; 136: 42–53
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hall SD, Wang Z, Huang SM, Hamman MA, Vasavada N, Adigun AQ, et al. The interaction between St John's wort and an oral contraceptive. Clin Pharmacol Ther 2003; 74: 525–35
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ang-Lee MK, Moss J, Yuan CS. Herbal medicines and perioperative care. J Am Med Assoc 2001; 286: 208–16
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar