308
Views
24
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Papers

Associations between asymmetry and human attractiveness: Possible direct effects of asymmetry and signatures of publication bias

Pages 317-323 | Received 30 Aug 2010, Accepted 26 Nov 2010, Published online: 27 Jan 2011

References

  • Baker RR. 1997. Copulation, masturbation, and infidelity: State-of-the-art. In Smith A, Atzwanger K, Grammar K, Schafer K editors. New aspects of human ethology. New York: Springer163–188.
  • Brown WM, Price ME, Kang JS, Pound N, Zhou Y, Yu H. 2008. Fluctuating asymmetry and preferences for sex-typical bodily characteristics. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 105:12938–12943.
  • Clarke GM. 2003. Developmental stability – fitness relationships in animals: some theoretical considerations. In Polak M editors. Developmental instability: causes and consequences. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Danel D, Pawlowski B. 2007. Eye–mouth–eye angle as a good indicator of face masculinization, asymmetry, and attractiveness (Homo sapiens). J Cogn Psychol. 121:221–225.
  • Duval S, Tweedie R. 2000. A non-parametric “Trim and Fill” method of accounting for publication bias in meta-analysis. J Am Stat Assoc. 95:89–98.
  • Fink B, Grammer K, Thornhill R. 2001. Human (Homo sapiens) facial attractiveness in relation to skin texture and color. J Compar Psychol. 115:92–99.
  • Fink B, Neave N, Manning JT, Grammer K. 2006. Facial symmetry and judgements of attractiveness, health and personality. Personality Individual Diff. 41:491–499.
  • Furlow B, Gangestad SW, Armijo-Prewitt T. 1998. Fluctuating asymmetry and human violence. Proc R Soc Lond B. 265:1–6.
  • Gangestad SW, Bennett KL, Thornhill R. 2001. A latent variable model of developmental instability in relation to men's sexual behaviour. Proc R Soc London B. 1477:1677–1684.
  • Gangestad SW, Merriman LA, Emery Thompson M, Unpublished data..
  • Gangestad SW, Thornhill R. 1997. The evolutionary psychology of extrapair sex: the role of fluctuating asymmetry. Evol Human Behav. 18:69–88.
  • Gangestad SW, Thornhill R. 1998. Menstrual cycle variation in women's preferences for the scent of symmetrical men. Proc R Soc Lond B. 265:927–933.
  • Gangestad SW, Thornhill R. 1999. Individual differences in developmental precision and fluctuating asymmetry: a model and its implications. J Evol Biol. 12:402–416.
  • Gangestad SW, Thornhill R, Garver-Apgar CE. 2005. Women's sexual interests across the ovulatory cycle depend on primary partner developmental instability. Proc R Soc Lond B. 272:2023–2027.
  • Gangestad SW, Thornhill R, Garver-Apgar CE, Unpublished data..
  • Gangestad SW, Thornhill R, Yeo R. 1994. Facial attractiveness, developmental stability, and fluctuating asymmetry. Ethol Sociobiol. 15:73–85.
  • Garver-Apgar CE, Gangestad SW, Thornhill R, Miller RD, Olp J. 2006. MHC alleles, sexually responsivity, and unfaithfulness in romantic couples. Psychol Sci. 17:830–835.
  • Grammer K, Thornhill R. 1994. Human (homo sapiens) facial attractiveness and sexual selection: the role of symmetry and averageness. J Compar Psychol. 108:233–242.
  • Haufe C. 2008. Sexual selection and mate choice in evolutionary psychology. Biol Philos. 23:115–128.
  • Honnekopp J, Bartholomé T, Jansen G. 2004. Facial attractiveness, symmetry, and physical fitness in young women. Human Nature. 15:147–167.
  • Houle D. 1997. Comment on ‘a meta-analysis of the heritability of developmental stability’ by Møller and Thornhill. J Evol Biol. 10:17–20.
  • Houle D. 2000. A simple model of the relationship between asymmetry and developmental stability. J Evol Biol. 13:720–730.
  • Hughes SM, Harrison MA, Gallup GG. 2002. The sound of symmetry: voice as a marker of developmental instability. Evol Human Behav. 23:173–180.
  • Hume DK, Montgomerie R. 2001. Facial attractiveness signals different aspects of “quality” in women and men. Evol Hum Behav. 22:93–112.
  • Jennions MD, Møller AP. 2001. Publication bias in ecology and evolution: an empirical assessment using the ‘trim and fill’ method. Biol Rev. 77:211–222.
  • Jennions MD, Møller AP. 2002. Relationships fade with time: a meta-analysis of temporal trends in publication in ecology and evolution. Proc R Soc London B. 269:43–48.
  • Jones BC, Little AC, Penton-Voak IS, Tiddeman BP, Burt DM, Perrett DI. 2001. Facial symmetry and judgements of apparent health: support for a ‘good genes’ explanation of the attractiveness–symmetry relationship. Evol Human Behav. 22:417–429.
  • Klingenberg CP. 2003. A developmental perspective on developmental instability: theory, models, and mechanisms. In Polak M editors. Developmental instability: causes and consequence. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Komori M, Kawamura S, Ishihara S. 2009. Averageness of symmetry: which is more important for facial attractiveness?. Acta Psychol. 131:136–142.
  • Kowner R. 1996. Facial asymmetry and attractiveness judgment in developmental perspective. J Exp Psychol Human Percept Perform. 22:662–675.
  • Little AC, Jones BC, Waitt C, Tiddeman BP, Feinberg DR, Perrett DI, Apicella CL, Marlowe FW. 2008. Symmetry is related to sexual dimorphism in faces: Data across culture and species. PLoS One. 3:e2106.
  • Møller AP. 1997. Developmental stability and fitness: a review. Am Nat. 149:916–932.
  • Møller AP, Thornhill R. 1998. Bilateral symmetry and sexual selection: a meta-analysis. Am Nat. 151:174–192.
  • Møller AP, Thornhill R, Gangestad SW. 2005. Direct and indirect tests for publication bias: asymmetry and sexual selection. Anim Beh. 70:497–506.
  • Palmer AR. 1999. Detecting publication bias in meta-analyses: a case study of fluctuating asymmetry and sexual selection. Am Nat. 154:220–233.
  • Penton-Voak IS, Jones BC, Little AC, Baker S, Tiddeman B, Burt DM, Perrett DI. 2001. Symmetry, sexual dimorphism in facial proportions, and male facial attractiveness. Proc R Soc B. 268:1617–1623.
  • Rhodes G, Simmons LW, Peters M. 2005. Attractiveness and sexual behavior: does attractiveness enhance mating success?. Evol Human Behav. 26:186–201.
  • Rikowski A, Grammer K. 1999. Human body odour, symmetry and attractiveness. Proc R Soc B. 266:869–874.
  • Scheib JE, Gangestad SW, Thornhill R. 1999. Facial attractiveness, symmetry, and cues of good genes. Proc R Soc B. 266:1913–1917.
  • Shackleford TK, Larsen RJ. 1997. Facial asymmetry as an indicator of psychological, emotional, and physiological distress. J Pers Soc Psychol. 72:456–466.
  • Simmons LW, Rhoades G, Peters M, Koehler N. 2004. Are human preferences for facial symmetry focused on signals of developmental instability?. Behav Ecol. 15:864–871.
  • Simpson JA, Gangestad SW, Christensen PN, Leck K. 1999. Fluctuating asymmetry, sociosexuality, and intrasexual competitive tactics. J Pers Soc Psychol. 76:159–172.
  • Thornhill R, Gangestad SW. 1994. Fluctuating asymmetry and human sexual behavior. Psychol Sci. 5:297–302.
  • Thornhill R, Gangestad SW. 1999. The scent of symmetry: a human sex pheromone that signals fitness?. Evol Human Behav. 20:175–201.
  • Thornhill R, Gangestad SW. 2006. Facial sexual dimorphism, developmental stability, and susceptibility to disease in men and women. Evol Human Behav. 27:131–144.
  • Thornhill R, Gangestad SW, Miller R, Scheyd G, McCollough J, Franklin M. 2003. MHC, symmetry and body scent attractiveness in men and women (Homo sapiens). Behav Ecol. 14:668–678.
  • Thornhill R, Møller AP, Gangestad SW. 1999. The biological significance of fluctuating asymmetry and sexual selection: a reply to Palmer. Am Nat. 154:234–241.
  • Tovée MJ, Tasker K, Benson PJ. 2000. Is symmetry a visual cue to attractiveness in the human female body?. Evol Hum Behav. 21:191–200.
  • Trivers R, Palestis BG, Zaatari D. 2009. Anatomy of a fraud: Symmetry and dance. Antioch, CA: TPZ Publishers.
  • Van Dongen S. 1998. How repeatable is the estimation of fluctuating asymmetry?. Proc R Soc London B. 265:1423–1427.
  • Van Dongen S. 2006. Fluctuating asymmetry and developmental instability in evolutionary biology: past, present and future. J Evol Biol. 19:1727–1743.
  • Van Dongen S, Cornille R, Lens L. Sex and asymmetry in humans: what is the role of developmental instability. J Evol Biol. 2009a; 22:612–622.
  • Van Dongen S, Wijnaendts LCD, Ten Broek CMA, Galis F. Fluctuating asymmetry does not consistently reflect severe developmental disorders in human fetuses. Evolution. 2009b; 63:1832–1844.
  • Waynforth D. 1999. Differences in time use for mating and nepotistic effort as a function of male attractiveness in rural Belize. Evol Human Behav. 20:19–28.
  • Whitlock M. 1996. The heritability of fluctuating asymmetry and the genetic control of developmental stability. Proc R Soc London B. 263:849–854.
  • Whitlock M. 1998. The repeatability of fluctuating asymmetry: a revision and extension. Proc R Soc London B. 265:1428–1430.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.