Effects of consanguineous marriage on reproductive behaviour, adverse pregnancy outcomes and offspring mortality in Oman

References

• Akrami SM, Osati Z. 2006. Is consanguineous marriage religiously encouraged? Islamic and Iranian consideration. J Biosoc Sci. 39:313–316.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Al-Abdulkareem AA, Ballal SG. 1998. Consanguineous marriage in an urban area of Saudi Arabia: rates and adverse health effects on the offspring. J Commun Health. 23:75–83.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Al-Awadi SA, Naguib KK, Moussa MA, Farag TI, Teebi AS, El-Khalifa MY. 1986. The effect of consanguineous marriages on reproductive wastage. Clin Genet. 29:384–388.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Al-Riyami A, Afifi M. 2003. Determinants of women's fertility in Oman. Saudi Med J. 24:748–753.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Al-Riyami A, Afifi M, Al-Kharusi H, Morsi M. 2000. National Health Survey, 2000 Volume 2. Reproductive Health Survey. Muscat: Ministry of Health.
   Google Scholar
• Al Riyami A, Elaty MAA, Morsi M, Al Kharusi H, Al Shukaily W, Jaju S. 2012. Oman World Health Survey: Part 1 - Methodology, sociodemographic profile and epidemiology of non-communicable diseases in Oman. Oman Med J. 27:425–443.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ansari SA, Sinha SP. 1978. Survey on the effects of inbreeding in two populations of Bihar. Indian J Med Res. 68:295–299.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Assaf S, Khawaja M. 2009. Consanguinity trends and correlates in the Palestinian Territories. J Biosoc Sci. 41:107–124.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Assaf S, Khawaja M, DeJong J, Mahfoud Z, Yunis K. 2008. Consanguinity and reproductive wastage in the Palestinian Territories. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol. 23:107–115.
   Google Scholar
• Bener A, Abdulrazzaq MY, Al-Gazali LI, Micallef R, Al-Khayat AI, Gaber T. 1996. Consanguinity and associated sociodemograhic factors in United Arab Emirates. Hum Hered. 46:256–264.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bener A, Hussain R. 2006. Consanguineous unions and child health in the State of Qatar. Pediatr Perinat Epidemiol. 20:372–378.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bittles AH. 1994. The role and significance of consanguinity as a demographic variable. Popul Dev Rev. 20:561–583.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bittles AH. 2001. Consanguinity and its relevance to clinical genetics. Clin Genet. 60:89–98.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bittles AH. 2002. Endogamy, consanguinity and community genetics. J Genet. 81:91–98.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bittles AH. 2008. A community genetics perspective on consanguineous marriage. Commun Genet. 11:324–330.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bittles AH, Black ML. 2010. The impact of consanguinity on neonatal and infant health. Early Hum Dev. 86:737–741.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bittles AH, Grant JC, Sullivan SG, Hussain R. 2002. Does inbreeding lead to decreased human fertility?. Ann Hum Bio. 29:111–130.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bittles AH, Mason WM, Greene J, Rao NA. 1991. Reproductive behaviour and health in consanguineous marriages. Science. 252:789–794.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bittles AH, Neel JV. 1994. The costs of human inbreeding and their implications for variations at the DNA level. Nature Genetics. 8:117–121.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brass W, Macrae S. 1985. Childhood mortality estimates from reports on previous births given by mothers at the time of a maternity. II. Adapted multiplying factors technique. Asian Pac. Census Forum. 11:5–9.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bundey S, Alam H. 1995. A five-year prospective study of the health of children in different ethnic groups with particular reference to the effect of inbreeding. Eur J Hum Genet. 24:1–15.
   Google Scholar
• Casterline J. 1989. Collecting data on pregnancy loss: a review of evidence from the world fertility survey. Stud Family Plann. 20:81–95.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dahl TS. 1997. The muslim family: a study of women's rights in Islam. Oslo: Scandinavian Universities Press.
   Google Scholar
• Devi ARR, Rao NA, Bittles AH. 1981. Consanguinity, fecundity and post-natal mortality in Karnataka, South India. Ann Hum Biol. 8:469–472.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Farah AA, Preston SH. 1982. Child mortality differentials in Sudan. Popul Dev Rev. 8:365–383.
   Google Scholar
• Fried K, Davies AM. 1974. Some effects on the offspring of uncle-niece marriage in the Moroccan Jewish community in Jerusalem. Am J Hum Genet. 26:65–72.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Fuster V. 2003. Inbreeding pattern and reproductive success in a rural community from Galicia (Spain). J Biosoc Sci. 35:83–93.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gowri V, Udayakumar AM, Bsiso W, Al- Farsi Y, Rao K. 2011. Recurrent early pregnancy loss and consanguinity in Omani couples. ACTA Obstet Gynecol Scand. 90:1167–1169.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gunaid AA, Hummad NA, Tamim KA. 2004. Consanguineous marriage in the capital city Sana'a, Yemen. J Biosoc Sci. 36:111–121.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hammami A, Chalbi N, Ben AM, Elgazzeh M. 2005. Effects of consanguinity and social factors on mortality and fertility in Mauritania. Tunis Med. 83:221–226.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hann KL. 1985. Inbreeding and fertility in a south Indian population. Ann Hum Biol. 12:267–274.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Helgason A, Palsson S, Gudbjartsson DF, Kristjansson T, Stefansson K. 2008. An association between the kinship and fertility of human couples. Science. 319:813–816.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hussain R, Bittles AH. 2004. Assessment of association between consanguinity and fertility in Asian populations. J Health Popul Nutr. 22:1–12.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Islam MM. 2012. The practice of consanguineous marriage in Oman: prevalence, tends and determinants. J Biosoc Sci. 44:571–594.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jaber L, Halpern GJ, Shohat M. 1998. The impact of consanguinity worldwide. Commun Genet. 1:12–17.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• James W. 1970. The incidence of spontaneous abortions. Popul Stud. 24:241–245.
   Google Scholar
• Kandari Y. 2007. Fertility and its relationship with sociocultural factors in Kuwaiti society. East Mediterr Health J. 13:1364–1371.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kerkeni E, Monastiri K, Seket B, Guediche MN, Cheikh HB. 2007. Interplay of socio-economic factors, consanguinity, fertility, and offspring mortality in Monastir, Tunisia. Croat Med J. 48:701–707.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khlat M. 1988. Consanguineous marriages in Beirut: time trends, spatial distribution. Soc Biol. 35:324–330.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khlat M, Halabi S, Khudr A, Der Kaloustian VM. 1986. Perception of consanguineous marriages and their genetic effects among a sample of couples from Beirut. Am J Med Genet. 25:299–306.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khoury M, Cohen B, Diamond E, Chase G, McKusick V. 1987. Inbreeding and prereproductive mortality in the old order Amish. III. Direct and indirect effects of inbreeding. Am J Epidemiol. 125:473–483.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Khoury SA, Massad D. 2000. Consanguinity, fertility, reproductive wastage, infant mortality and congenital malformation in Jordan. Saudi Med J. 21:150–154.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Leridon H. 1976. Facts and artifacts in the study of intra-uterine mortality: a reconsideration from pregnancy histories. Popul Stud. 30:319–335.
   Google Scholar
• Mokhtar MM, Abdel-Fattah MM. 2001. Consanguinity and advanced maternal age as risk factors for reproductive losses in Alexandria, Egypt. Eur J Epidemiol. 17:559–565.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mumtaz G, Tamim H, Kanaan M, Khawaja M, Khogali M, Wakim G, Yunis KA. 2007. Effect of consanguinity on birth weight for gestational age in a developing country. Am J Epidemiol. 165:742–752.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Philippe P. 1974. Amenorrhea, intrauterine mortality and parental consanguinity in an isolated French Canadian population. Hum Biol. 46:405–424.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Rajab A, Freeman NV, Patton MA. 1996. The frequency of posterior urethral valves in Oman. Br J Urol. 77:900–904.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Rajab A, Freeman NV, Patton MA. 1997. Hirschsprung's disease in Oman. J Pediatr Surg. 32:724–727.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rajab A, Patton MA. 1997. Major factors determining the frequencies of hemoglobinopathies in Oman. Am J Med Genet. 71:241–242.
   Google Scholar
• Rajab A, Patton MA. 2000. A study of consanguinity in the Sultanate of Oman. Ann Hum Biol. 27:321–326.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rajab A, Vaishnav A, Freeman NV, Patton MA. 1998. Neural tube defects and congenital hydrocephalus in the Sultanate of Oman. J Trop Pediatr. 44:299–303.
   Google Scholar
• Rao PSS, Inbaraj SG. 1977. Inbreeding effects on human reproduction in Tamil Nadu of South India. Ann Hum Genet. 41:87–98.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rao PSS, Inbaraj SG. 1979. Inbreeding effects on fertility and sterility in southern India. J Med Genet. 16:24–31.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raycov T, Marcoulides GA. 2008. An introduction to multivariate analysis. New York, London: Routledge, Taylor and Francis Group.
   Google Scholar
• Reddy VM, Rao AP. 1978. Inbreeding efforts in a coastal village and other parts of Andra Pradesh. Acta Genetic. Med Gemellol. 27:89–93.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Reddy PC. 1983. Consanguinity and inbreeding effects on fertility, mortality and morbidity in the Malas of Chittoor district. Z. Morphol Anthropol. 74:45–51.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Reid RM. 1976. Effects of consanguineous marriage and inbreeding on couple fertility and offspring mortality in rural Sri Lanka. Hum Biol. 48:139–146.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saadat M. 2007. Consanguineous marriages in Iranian folktales. Commun Genet. 10:37–40.
   Google Scholar
• Saha N, Hamad RE, Mohamed S. 1990. Inbreeding effects on reproductive outcome in a Sudanese population. Hum Hered. 40:208–212.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sawardekar KP. 2005. Profile of major congenital malformations at Nizwa Hospital, Oman: 10-year review. J Paediatr Child Health. 41:323–330.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schull WJ, Furusho T, Yamamoto M, Nagano H, Komatsu I. 1970. The effects of consanguinity and inbreeding in Hirado, Japan. IV. Fertility and reproductive compensation. Humangenetik. 9:294–315.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Stoltenberg C, Magnus P, Skrondal A, Lie RT. 1999. Consanguinity and recurrence risk of stillbirth and infant death. Am J Public Health. 89:517–523.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sulaiman AJM, Al-Riyami A, Farid S. 2000. Oman Family Health Survey 1995 Final Report. Muscat: Ministry of Health.
   Google Scholar
• Tadmouri GO, Nair P, Obeid T, Al Ali MT, Al Khaja N, Hamamy HA. 2009. Consanguinity and reproductive health among Arabs. Reprod Health. 6:17–24.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Tanner RES. 1958. Fertility and child mortality in cousin marriages: a study in a Moslem community in east Africa. Eugen Rev. 49:197–199.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Weinreb AA. 2008. Characteristics of women in consanguineous marriages in Egypt, 1988–2000. Eur J Popul. 24:185–210.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilcox AJ, Weinberg CR, O'Connor JF, Baird DD, Schlatterer JP, Canfield RE, Armstrong EG, Nisula BC. 1988. Incidence of early loss of pregnancy. N Engl J Med. 319:189–194.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• WHO. 2006. Medical genetic services in developing Countries: the ethical, legal and social implications of genetic testing and screening. Geneva: WHO.
   Google Scholar